START A PETITION 27,000,000 members: the world's largest community for good
2,067,175 people care about Politics

Finally, United States Signs Global Arms Trade Treaty

Finally, United States Signs Global Arms Trade Treaty

Written by Hayes Brown

The United States on Wednesday finally added its name to the signatories of the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty (ATT), a step sure to please human rights activists and enrage Republicans.

Secretary of State John Kerry signed the treaty on behalf of the United States on Wednesday, making the U.S. the 91st country to do so. “I signed it because President Obama knows that from decades of efforts that anytime we work with — cooperatively to address the illicit trade in conventional weapons, we make the world a safer place,” Kerry said. “And this treaty is a significant step in that effort.”

The legal arms trade, comprised of both the import and export weapons, constitutes around $70 billion annually. Attack helicopters, tanks and other larger arms are covered under the treaty, as well as small arms and ammunition for these weapons. Under theterms of the treaty, states are required to determine whether the shipment of arms to a second country would be used to commit atrocities or violate human rights or if they could be diverted for such a purpose, and report back to the U.N. Secretariat on their efforts.

Counter to worries that the ATT will constitute an infringement of the Second Amendment in the United States, the American Bar Association has concluded that Americans needn’t fear such an outcome. As the ABA points out in theirwhite paper, import restrictions on firearms have been ruled constitutionally valid. At present, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms alreadyregulates and tracks the import of firearms into the United States, leaving no need for further domestic legislation regarding the ATT’s implementation. Exports of firearms, the ABA also notes, are not protected under the Second Amendment.

“This treaty will not diminish anyone’s freedom,” Kerry said. “In fact the treaty recognizes the ability of both individuals and states to obtain, possess, and use arms for legit purposes. Make no mistake, we would never think about supporting a treaty that is inconsistent with the rights of Americans, the rights of American citizens, to be able to exercise their guaranteed rights under our Constitution.”

The U.S.voted in favor of the treaty in April, as did the vast majority of the world. In fact, only Syria, Iran and North Koreavoted against it.

Activists have been urging President Obama to sign the Arms Trade Treaty for months now. At the end of a meeting with Obama administration officials in August, members of a coalition of activists ranging from religious evangelicals to arms control advocatespassed along a letter to the President, urging swift action on the ATT. “Your Administration demonstrated leadership by supporting the Treaty through its development,” the letter read. “Signing the Arms Trade Treaty will demonstrate strong US leadership and help create important momentum for the treaty.”

Conservativeshave been insisting, absent real evidence, that the ATT will kick the U.S. down aslippery slope towards mass gun confiscation. The National Rifle Association never fans of the treaty has been fundraising based on that premise, urging its members to write to their senators to vote against the treaty. For the treaty to be ratified, two-thirds of the Senate will have to vote in favor of it, giving the ATT slim prospects in the face of virulent GOP opposition.

This post was originally published in ThinkProgress

Read more: , , ,

Photo Credit: Wikimedia Commons

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it


+ add your own
5:18AM PDT on Oct 18, 2013

This is the beginning of the loss of our freedoms

10:24AM PDT on Oct 2, 2013

So....think this will stop the US from starting anymore wars??

6:02AM PDT on Oct 1, 2013

WE should not be selling arms to the terrorists in others countries to use against our soldiers in Afghanistan and other places where they are stationed.

9:43PM PDT on Sep 30, 2013

As my cousin in law who works at Remington said "There goes our internet sales to Somalia!". THAT is what the opposition from the NRA to this treaty is about, gun huggers. It's got nothing to do with the US, but feel free to press your senators to make arms sales to war lords and terrorists in the Middle East safe for American gun and ammo makers. What patriots you are, arming the other side in the War on Terror. Morons.

1:30PM PDT on Sep 30, 2013

well, good!

1:10PM PDT on Sep 30, 2013

Thank you for sharing.

1:08PM PDT on Sep 30, 2013

It's aabout time

10:55AM PDT on Sep 30, 2013

Steven B is right half of you nitwits don't seem to be able to read correctly. This is an international arms treaty. It has nothing to do with your personal rights to own guns. You will still be able to go to your neighbor hood gun dealer and buy as many as your heart desires.

9:27AM PDT on Sep 30, 2013

I hope it means something positive...

7:49AM PDT on Sep 30, 2013


add your comment

Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

Care2 - Be Extraordinary - Start a Care2 Petition
ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

Alliance for Defending GFreedom, you say "“Allowing students to use opposite-sex restrooms and locker…

Ideally she should now be kept for good with her fawn in some sanctuary.

Carly Fiorina is wrong in many ways. The idea that we shouldn't be regulating, we should be innovating…

ads keep care2 free

Select names from your address book   |   Help

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.

site feedback


Problem on this page? Briefly let us know what isn't working for you and we'll try to make it right!