START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x
1,355,500 people care about Politics

Gun Crazy: Why is America Different from Other Countries?

Gun Crazy: Why is America Different from Other Countries?

The 1989 school shooting at the École Polytechnique, also known as the Montreal Massacre, was, and remains the worst in Canadian history. 14 people were killed by shooter Marc Lépine, all women, before he turned the gun on himself. This exceeds the victim death toll of the later Columbine massacre by one, though it’s eclipsed by the events in Newtown, Connecticut this past December.

Some people might be surprised that we have school shootings in Canada. It’s true: we’re not immune to those rare bouts of madness that drive a person to do the unthinkable. There may always be people whose minds break in that way, no matter where you live, no matter how much headway we make against society’s endemic problems. And yet the numbers tell a story of gun violence in Canada that is wildly divergent from that of the United States.

The Canadian story begins in the small town of Altona, not far from where I live, where a disgruntled teacher killed several school trustees and children before turning the gun on himself, way back in 1902. It’s one of 11 such incidents in Canadian history, and the second worst. The majority of school shootings here have only had a single death, and the most recent, in 2010, ended without loss of life.

The United States, meanwhile, has had school shootings in every decade since the 1850s, and the last two full years to go by without one of these horrific events? 1990 and 1981. Last month alone there where eight gun attacks in schools in the United States. It’s getting worse instead of better, perhaps even exponentially so.

To what can we attribute such a stark difference between two such culturally and economically similar countries? Some hint might be found in the public response to these tragedies. The Montreal Massacre sparked a huge public outcry that became a powerful and ultimately successful movement for tighter gun control. Lépine was armed with a semi-automatic rifle that was legally obtained and registered to him. A few years later, he would not have so easily been able to obtain that type of weapon.

In the wake of Columbine, and more recently, the Newtown shootings, the public response in America has been almost exactly the same — on the left. But it’s also been immediately met by a counter-current from conservatives defending the second amendment and decrying gun-control advocates as reactionaries or un-American. Yet this is only a political issue in the United States.

We certainly have conservative politicians and voters in Canada, but the right to carry weapons simply isn’t considered a partisan issue. Most of us don’t argue about gun control because we don’t have a centuries-long history of casual access to guns which we’re afraid to lose. Many of us hunt, but not with assault weapons, and not without proper training and deep respect for gun safety. Beyond hunting, few feel the need to own a gun and are happy to limit their use. And this isn’t just Canada, but virtually every Western country outside of the United States.

Easy access to guns is clearly a critical factor in incidences of gun violence. Before first-person shooter video games and copycat killers and mass media madness, in the middle of the 19th-century, American kids were even then bringing in guns to school and shooting people. Maybe by mistake, maybe as crimes of passion, or maybe as pre-meditated, cold-blooded murder. It was easy to get guns, and so momentary lapses in judgement became irreparable mistakes.

At one time, everyone accepted guns as a ubiquitous tool of rural life. It wasn’t about being gun crazy. It’s just how things were. The part I just can’t figure out is how the idea of needing lots of guns became so entrenched that decent people would actually fight tooth and nail to keep them out there.

Here in Canada, I’ve been threatened with a knife by someone at a party I didn’t even know, robbed several times while tending shop alone, and just recently, almost witnessed a completely pointless and random assault on public transport. We’re not saner up here. But fewer of our crazy people have guns, and that makes a considerable difference.

 

Related Stories:

Colorado Proposes Holding Gun Manufacturers Liable For Gun Violence

How Ending the War on Drugs Could Curb Gun Violence

It’s Never Too Soon to Discuss These 5 Ways to Curb Gun Violence

 

Read more: , , , , , , , ,

Photo credit: Thinkstock

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

574 comments

+ add your own
6:15AM PDT on Apr 21, 2013

Amusing Robert H, I speak cat and have never been communist nor do I hop or sing with the Spring Peepers. If Spring ever arrives again. It is almost May but give it time to arrive. But I do enjoy listening to thousands of frogs singing in the wetlands, a stirring symphony indeed. Anyone can borrow a Cyrillic keyboard off the internet.

= ^ . , . ^ =

8:56AM PDT on Mar 18, 2013

thks for posting

6:47AM PST on Mar 9, 2013

I wish the 2nd amendment had never been written - at the time we were under attack by the Brits and had no military - and a divided country that had British sympathizers - the necessity for the amendment in that period was valid -- today we do have a military - with very strict regulations on its weaponry! Would that the citizens have more restrictive regulations! Assault weapons don't belong in civilian hands, I'm not a gun owner, but am not aggainst those wha are per se, they don't need large capacity clips, or semi and automatic weapons - back ground checks should be mandatory. If people get their "rocks off" by playing with automatic guns -- let them go play at a range under supervision - not in schools or on playgrounds!

4:19PM PST on Mar 8, 2013

Thank you for sharing.

5:29PM PST on Mar 3, 2013

The difference is that the founding fathers of the United States were wise in the manners of humanity.

12:33PM PST on Feb 28, 2013

I find it strange that some people here alternately call "left wing" folks, "A" - anti freedom and at the same time "B" - refer to them as free spirit, tree hugging hippies who want everyone to be happy campers running around, presumably naked and embracing the GLBT community while sharing the wealth with the poor. Which is it? A wee bit paradoxical according to the particular topic.

3:58PM PST on Feb 27, 2013

Nice Tirade John D

Unfortunately for you no one is destroying the 2nd amendments and no one is taking away your ability to defend yourself

3:29PM PST on Feb 27, 2013

the left wing anti freedom authors of these studys will tell you all kinds of lies and stupid reasons why a gun can not protect you. is anyone that gullible to beleive them. when you are alone in an unsafe place by accident car broke or whatever are these self serveing gun banners going to protect you if you are attacted.. only be sure of what you can do for yourself because in the end that may be the only thing that will save you banning guns suggests that a big government with more police will always be there to save you that is false. and wishfull thinking banning guns take power and safety away from you and puts that power in the hands of corrupt buroecrats. if it was not for the NRA showing you how guns were able to save lives you would never know as 99% of the news media is left wing and anti freedom they hide this but yet they get hard to get gun carry permits when they want them and armed guards as well like they did in rockland county NY women because of their very nature are much more varnable to crime so along come these lie spinners to say you might some how shoot your self. drugs were the cause of much crime and black on black shooting. but yet this gives the right to ban guns for everyone how fair is that

10:07PM PST on Feb 26, 2013

Go ahead Dale O you commie Frog
ROTFL

7:34PM PST on Feb 26, 2013

Linda M, your comment is a riot, so amusing about the town being totally renovated in the U.S. because the queen of England paid a visit. That certainly reminded me of the fake Potemkin village ( Потёмкинские деревни) built to impress a certain Empress Catherine II during her visit to Crimea in Russia way back in 1787.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Potemkin_village

Some cities just love to evict the poor from their neighbourhoods after being awarded the Olympics and World Cup such as Brazil. Just for show.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/kenrapoza/2012/08/12/some-brazilians-not-happy-about-olympics/

Don't have a Cyrillic keyboard but bet some right wingers will think I'm a 'commie' because I put two Russian words up, lol. Should I speak French as well?

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

Oh how happy this makes me. When celebrities get involved in a cause they have such a tremendous influence…

Thank you and I am AGAIN speechless about the MF MOB

Why stop at money being the criteria for who is allowed to reproduce? Perhaps women who are disabled…

Story idea? Want to blog? Contact the editors!
ads keep care2 free

more from causes

Animal Welfare

Causes Canada

Causes UK

Children

Civil Rights

Education

Endangered Wildlife

Environment & Wildlife

Global Development

Global Warming

Health Policy

Human Rights

LGBT rights

Politics

Real Food

Trailblazers For Good

Women's Rights




Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.