- checking login information
Loading...Hillary Clinton: Extremists “All Want to Control Women…Even Here At Home” [VIDEO]
![Hillary Clinton: Extremists “All Want to Control Women…Even Here At Home” [VIDEO]](http://dingo.care2.com/pictures/causes/2919/2918212.large.jpg)
Speaking at Women in the World 2012, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton notes that extremism and sexism isn’t just in other countries. It’s happening here at home, and we need to be setting the example for the rest of the world that women aren’t willing to be controlled.
Read more: abortion, birth control, Hillary Clinton, reproductive rights, war on women, war_on_women
Photo credit: Youtube screen grab
Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may
not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.
Recent Comments from Causes
I saw a video where a gentleman used a vortex turbine idea to make a wind powered devise that he put…
Good work!
Hi! If you are looking for activity partners, travel companions, dream lover or soul mate,you can google…
meet our writers
192 comments
+ add your ownIt doesn't matter what anyone thinks of Clinton; pro or con because she's made her mark and I suspect she will continue to do some really significant things for this country. I could really care whether a few here want to continue to put their own spin on things because Clinton's accomplishments are not going to be diminished by you in the least.
Did he say effective leader? Does Lee W live on the same planet as the rest of us? I figure he must live in another reality. As much as I like and respect the lady she is a long way from an effective leader. For the life of me I cannot figure out what you have been watching.
Are you still beating that tired drum Robby? Hillary is an effective leader, will continue to be so until she decides she's had enough of fighting for people's rights and even yours Robby. Whether you like her or not will have little consequence on her political popularity so it really matters not that that old drum roll continues. Talk about thin skin!
You're way too thin-skinned for legal work & can't seem to remember the order of events. My first post to you, in another thread, was respectful & polite. You were insulting & childish towards me. I kept my demeanor for several more posts until you insulted me a few times too many. I finally retorted, but still, nowhere near as rude & insulting as you'd been. Somewhere in there, you got all hot & bothered & said that your "good will towards" me was gone. I said nothing to warrant that BS reply. What you call "vindictive attacks" are laughable. And saying silly things like "Since you are a friend of Robby's, you would do well to advise him about demeanor and fallacies..." So, now your giving Lindsey life advice? You must be pretty smart... Oh, "...and while I try to be respectful, and, were you have the desire, you would see, in most instances I am. I do find it difficult to keep quiet when I read post after post submitted by Robby making absolutely baseless accusations..." I'm posting back to you b/c you won't STFU & keep bringing me in to your petty world of classless 2-party warfare BS! What baseless accusations are you referring to?
Apparently you haven't read your posts to me. Go read your "attacks" & compare some of your "nothing I've said to you compares to the vileness of which you've attacked me" BS. "Vile?" Do you even know the definition of that word? What have I said that was "vile?" I would seriously like to know.
Lindsey- she's always been pro-gun control, to some extent. The UN small arms treatyhas been around for years & Clinton has committed to working w/them, on it- this does not mean she has signed it into law like much left/right wing propaganda would have one believe. But, the treaty is cause for SERIOUS concern since no one knows what's in it- like Pelosi's "we'll have pass it so you can see what's in it." I certainly don't trust hillary- that said, I don't trust many politicians. If you've seen something that demonstrates she's not for gun control or small arms treaty, etc, please let me know. I respect your opinions & particularly your respectful manner of debate, even on the rare occasions we disagree. Here are two articles:
http://www.thedailybell.com/2843/Adrian-Krieg-The-Proposed-UN-Small-Arms-Treaty-pushed-by-Hillary-Clinton
&
http://actualgrit.wordpress.com/2012/01/05/united-nations-small-arms-treaty-pushed-by-hillary-clinton/
Now, some of the posters on these sites have taken things further & are far right/left wing. As you know, I am not right wing. I pity far left AND far right. But that treaty is bad- too much power is too much power- I don't care if it's hillary, hussein, GW, hitler, BO, soros, the kocks, etc. Obama signed exec order 12425- VERY FEW know anything about that.
Lee, do you know what Executive Order 12425 is? Why was it signed during the Christmas season? You're way too thin-skinned for legal work & can't seem to reme
Hilary Clinton couldn't be more accurate.
Truer words were never spoken.
Marisa - go to You Tube and type in the video. Her speech was approximately 30 minutes in length. Hope that helps.
What I'd love is access to video of Hillary's full speech...does anyone know how to get it?
Robby - your position in your last post differs greatly from your other posts relating to this article. You have made drastic accusations even accusing her of using the UN....
Also, as I've stated, I have made apologies whenever I feel I am in error (I have no problem doing that regarding a particular post) but I do so publicly rather than in private because I want people to know I recognize my own error. I've also stated I will not be apologizing to you here because you are simply wrong. With links you've provided, it tells anyone with enough common sense to recognize fact from fiction, that propagandists are alive and well, and propagandists are the same people who often provoke people who are easily influenced to commit crimes. They plant the metaphorical seed, then let others do exactly what them want them to which is the propagandists dirty work. And is it the propagandists who pay the price for those crimes? No, it is the actual perpetrator. Anyway, I spoke out against your assertions claiming Clinton is trying to undo our Constitution and that she is using the UN to serve her own purposes. Two blatantly false allegations.
The statement that Clinton is using the UN trying to force Constitutional change is the U.S. and every statement you've made in these threads against here, are totally false. She's never given any sensible person any reason to believe that. And sensible people don't believe that. The attacks on Clinton are totally baseless and while you have a right to your own like or dislike of her, you don't have the right to simply fabricate in order to vilify her because, again, she's never alluded to wanting to change the Constitution, nor does she want to take away the right to bear arms. I find your posts alarming and since I received one from a former friend this weekend who is a Libertarian, I've come to realize that GENERALLY people on the far right will say virtually anything to further their own agenda.
login to add your comment
use your care2 login
add your comment