START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x
1,187,754 people care about Politics

Hypocrisy?: Republican National Committee Money Will Continue to Help Fund Elective Abortions Through Cigna

Hypocrisy?: Republican National Committee Money Will Continue to Help Fund Elective Abortions Through Cigna

Last Thursday, Politico reported that the Republican National Committee (RNC) has been offering coverage for elective abortions in their employee insurance plans since 1991—which as Politico points out is “a procedure the party’s own platform calls ‘a fundamental assault on innocent human life.”"

This of course shows the hypocrisy of the 76 Republican members of Congress who voted for the Stupak Amendment which prohibits federal funds from being used to buy health insurance that covers elective abortions.

Since this information has come to light, pro-life conservatives, such as, those on RedState.com have not only called for the removal of that policy provision but have also stated that “no pro-lifer in good conscience can give [the RNC] a dime until” until the RNC “disclose[s] the names of all people involved in any way of the selection of their health care plan. And those people must be summarily fired. No severance packages, no golden parachutes; fired. For cause.”

So far, RNC Chairman Michael Steele has not responded to the call to make heads roll but he has declared that “Money from our loyal donors should not be used for this purpose” and “I don’t know why this policy existed in the past, but it will not exist under my administration. Consider this issue settled.”

Such a move has received praise from former presidential candidate and former governor of Arkansas turned television host, Mike Huckabee, who reportedly stated,

“I think we need to commend Michael Steele for his quick and decisive corrective action on this. I am appalled that it was ever covered and it shouldn’t have been, but Michael didn’t create the problem, he inherited it without realizing it, but when brought to his attention, he did the right thing.”

Unfortunately for Steele, even with Huckabee’s support this issue is far from settled. For one, it is unlikely that removing the option will assuage pro-lifers who concur with the demands of Red State blogger Leon Wolfe that those responsible need to be terminated. For another, it is also clear that donations to the RNC will still continue to fund elective abortions because money paid to Cigna from the RNC goes into a pool which Cigna uses to cover other clients—even clients that offer their employees elective abortion coverage.

Unless the RNC finds an insurance carrier that does not offer any clients elective abortion coverage, their money will go to support such practices. For that matter, I have to wonder—are Leon Wolfe and the other pro-lifers out there are subsidizing abortions via their own insurance plans? It is unlikely they do not because such coverage is a standard provision offered by most insurance companies.

So what is the RNC going to do? Are they going to find an insurance company that doesn’t offer any abortions? Does such a company exist? If not what are they going to do about it?

How will Michael Steele react to the demands of Leon Wolfe and the pro-lifers who have loyally donated to the RNC and are now feeling betrayed? Will he acquiesce to their demands or will he go on the attack and investigate their health plans? I would prefer the latter but even the former would make for a pretty interesting week.

Update:
Could the RNC plan also cover “death panels”???? This may bear some further investigation because as Think Progress has discovered Cigna does provide end-of-life services and, in fact, Cigna offers “indepth information on the practice on its website.”  The website states, “you will face many hard decisions as you near the end of life. Those decisions will include what kind of care you’d like to receive, where you’d like to receive care, and who will make decisions about your care should you not be able to make decisions yourself. No one knows when his or her time may come. So it’s a good idea to spend some time planning what you want at the end of life.”

It is hard to see how this could be considered a death panel.

This could be another bombshell sine it would be further proof of the RNC’s hypocrisy. As Think Progress reports, Steele and the RNC supported Palin’s hyperbolic use of the phrase “death panels” to bash end-of-life provisions in the health care bill.

These of course were shown to be nothing but a myth meant scare the public into opposing health care reform.

To be fair not all Republicans backed such rhetoric. When Senator Isakson (R-GA) was first asked about the Palin death panels he stated, “I have no idea. I understand — and you have to check this out — I just had a phone call where someone said Sarah Palin’s web site had talked about the House bill having death panels on it where people would be euthanized. How someone could take an end-of-life directive or a living will as that is nuts. You’re putting the authority in the individual rather than the government. I don’t know how that got so mixed up. [...]“

But for the most part Repuclicans and the RNC endorsed such charges as a means of taking control of the debate and stopping health care reform.

Now that it is known that Cigna, the health care provider of the RNC, supports end-of-life care, can the RNC in good conscious still obtain their insurance from this company? For conservative voters it will be bad enough that their money will be used to pay for elective abortions for other Cigna clients…now their money will also be used to pay for corporate death panels. Unless of course, the RNC thinks it is perfectly acceptable to allow corporations to “dictate” American’s “end-of-life” i.e. the charge they leveled against the health reform bill in an RNC July research document.

So there you have it: At best RNC money is funding “death panels” at worst they are actually offering “death panels” as a service to their own employees. Regardless, I don’t see how the RNC can keep using Cigna as their insurance provider, unless all their talk of not using donations to fund abortions and the fear mongering over death panels is the talk of a bunch of political hypocrites.

Check these other Care2 posts on the Stupak Amendment:

There is Nothing Courageous About Denying Womens Reproductive Rights

Abortion in Health Care Reform At Risk

The Stupak Setback

Cecile Richards Rallies the Troops

Abortion and Health Care Reform: How the House Bill Forces Women to Accept Less Coverage Than They Already Have

Petition to Remove the Stupak Amendment

Read more: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Photo Credit: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/img/story/Steele
Scott P

quick poll

vote now!

Loading poll...

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

28 comments

+ add your own
2:03AM PST on Jan 29, 2010

the rnc has always been know for its hypocracy. they pronounce uphold to the constitution but conviently for forget 'seperation of church and state' for votes from holy rollers.

10:46PM PST on Jan 28, 2010

It is past time for the Republicans, the Catholics, or any other person or group, to think that they should control the reproductive rights of a woman.

4:24AM PST on Jan 11, 2010

Not a repub, but he did say that it is out of the program once it was brought to his attention. Respect him for that (Michael Steele).
what i object to is PAYING for abortion. it will always be available, just make wonem pay for it and they will then agree contraceptives are a much better alternative.
no idea why THAT is so offensive to some.

1:24AM PST on Dec 8, 2009

"some Republican moderates are pro choice."

"Pro-choice" for certain parts, not all the way like true pro-choicers are.

1:17AM PST on Dec 8, 2009

The Republicans just keep getting more misogynistic.

6:07AM PST on Nov 22, 2009

I want Sarah Palin to run for president in 2012 - preferably along with Michelle Bachman. That would take care of the problem of the republican party once and for all.

1:48PM PST on Nov 18, 2009

It seems that there is some confusion about the effect of the Stupak amendment and it's effect on abortion coverage. The plan passed by the House that includes the Stupak amendment has a public option and what is called an insurance exchange. Private insurance companies can join the insurance exchange to get government subsidies to lower their premiums. The Stupak amendment affects not only the public option but prevents insurance companies that belong to the exchange from covering elective abortions. Since most private insurance companies will probably join the exchange, only the rich women in the country that can afford to buy high premium private insurance from companies that did not join the exchange could get abortion coverage under the Stupak amendment. It won't matter if you now have abortion coverage or not. If your insurance company joins the exchange they will have to drop elective abortion coverage under the Stupak amendment, even though you are paying the premiums for private insurance. This MUST be eliminated in the final bill or almost no woman in America will have elective abortion coverage.

1:23PM PST on Nov 18, 2009

Just as the Democrats have the "blue dogs" some Republican moderates are pro choice. Please don't group all Republicans into the pro-life category. I'm old enough to remember when the Republican party had no official stance on abortion. I think they would be much better off if they went back to that position.

3:22AM PST on Nov 18, 2009

Kelly D,

You are probably right that no plan exists that doesn't provide abortion coverage to some of its clients but if the, largely Republican supported, Stupak Amendment makes it into the final health bill a public insurance option will be created that will not provide abortion coverage. In other words, there will only be one insurance option that does not provide abortion coverage...the one sponsored by the government. If this happens perhaps the RNC should drop their insurance and let their employees sign up for the public option, that way they will be able to adhere to their anti-choice ideals...of course then they would have to give in on their anti-government doing anything other than bombing other countries ideals.

7:58PM PST on Nov 17, 2009

There are too many Catholics taking birth control to ever get enough of them together to fight against taxes and insurance. I don't think there is an insurance company on the planet that refuses to pay a portion of abortions. I think the RNC's major problem is that they have it as a covered benefit under the plan they purchase for their employees, not that Cigna provides it for anyone.

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

maybe freddy r could use thd space here to educate instead of criticize?

Trust Phyllis Schlafly to be dragged out of the moth balls when the GOP think they need a woman's voice.…

All I can say is AMAZING!! Love at last for a forgotten and neglected beautiful dog and its caring 'owner'…

meet our writers

Kristina Chew Kristina Chew teaches ancient Greek, Latin and Classics at Saint Peter's University in New Jersey.... more
Story idea? Want to blog? Contact the editors!

more from causes

Animal Welfare

Causes Canada

Causes UK

Children

Civil Rights

Education

Endangered Wildlife

Environment & Wildlife

Global Development

Global Warming

Health Policy

Human Rights

LGBT rights

Politics

Real Food

Trailblazers For Good

Women's Rights




Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.