How to Stave Off California Park Closures


Written by Elizabeth Goldstein

SAN FRANCISCO–A crisis has hit California’s great outdoors. Seventy of our 279 California state parks are set to close on July 1, 2012, because of budget cuts.

This means that 70 iconic places will no longer be available to the public, such as the breathtaking coastlines of Garrapata or Morro Strand; historic landmarks, like Jack London and Petaluma Adobe; or the recreational locations, such as Annadel or China Camp.

These closures are a direct result of Gov. Jerry Brown’s proposed $22 million permanent general fund cut to the California Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR). But this $22 million is really just the final straw. DPR’s budget has suffered ongoing cuts for well over a decade.

These are tough times for state parks. The implications of these budget cuts hurt local communities across the state. Closing state parks is bad for local businesses, bad for tourism, bad for jobs, bad for health and wellbeing, and bad for California.

70 Million Visitors Spend $6 Billion a Year

Almost 70 million people visit the state’s parks annually, and they generate an annual economic benefit of more than $6 billion statewide. With all this at stake, a budget cut that gives the state a mere fraction of a percent in savings is not worth it.

Many Californians seem to understand this. For several months now, the parks community has been stepping up in significant ways to help parks slated for closure.

Three kinds of partnerships are taking shape. First, government agencies are providing assistance to help keep parks open.

Second, many state-parks organizations and associations are fundraising to keep their particular parks open.

Finally, some nonprofit organizations are evaluating their ability to manage parks directly. They can do so under the new operating authority that DPR received from the passage of Assembly Bill 42 in January.

The bill authorizes DPR to enter into operating agreements with qualified nonprofits to provide visitor services in state parks, facilitate public access to park resources, improve park facilities, and provide interpretive and educational services.

To date, approximately 13 parks on the closure list have found stopgap measures to stay open through one of the above partnerships, and many more are in the works. Even though these partnerships are commendable, they are, unfortunately, temporary solutions. That is, they won’t restore the needed funding from the state government.

Key Legislation

Two key pieces of legislation are moving through the legislature in Sacramento that could help state parks. Assembly Bill 1589, introduced by Jared Huffman, D-Marin, is an omnibus bill for state parks funding and sustainability.

Senate Bill 580 by Sen. Lois Wolk, D-Davis, is a parks-protection bill requiring that state park lands not be used for non-park purposes unless replacement lands of equivalent value are provided. Both of these bills would be a big step in the right direction for state parks.

In order to prevent these closures and protect our state parks, citizens must intervene and tell Gov. Brown they are opposed to these cuts and the closures.

Those who wish to express their support for the parks can send a message to their legislators through the California State Parks Foundation (CSPF) website, Additionally, it is crucial for everyone to help spread the word, particularly through social media (#defendwhatsyours).

The cuts may well go deeper. Not only have Brown’s budget cuts led to the closure of 70 parks, but all seasonal lifeguards on state beaches and 20 percent of park rangers will be laid off if his revenue package does not pass in November.

Visit CSPF’s Defend What’s Yours page at and learn more about how you can become a defender, sign our pledge, contact your legislators, volunteer and more.

This post was originally published by New America Media.


Related Stories:

Top 5 American Treasures to Protect in 2012

Spectacular Stretch of California Coastline To Be Preserved

What Is The National Park Service? Explore 7 Awesome Parks (Slideshow)


Photo of Garrapata State Park from mlhradio via flickr


LMj Sunshine


LMj Sunshine


LMj Sunshine


Carl Oerke
Carl O5 years ago

Parks and recreation are important for tourism and the health and well being of the citizens. California's parks should ot be closed.

Ron B.
Ron B5 years ago

If anything, we need more parks, not fewer. The rich elite have their exclusive playgrounds and they normally don't include state parks. As the article implies, people need to organize and work with government agencies to do whatever it takes to at least keep the existing parks open. It's a shame that it's come down to this considering the screwed up priorities of our country. If the rich were forced to pay their fair share of taxes, there would be enough funds to keep parks open, not to mention enough to keep people healthier and our infrastructure from crumbling among other things.

Vicki C.
Vicki Cook5 years ago

I agree with Troy G. and Lynne S.

Kat Head
Katherine H5 years ago

Protect the national parks!!!

Troy G.
Troy Grant5 years ago

Let the Bush tax cuts expire, cut the MIC budget, stop giving tax breaks to Big Oil, stop giveaways to companies that export jobs, end the trillion dollar War on (some) Drugs, forgive student loans, take money out of politics, let the people decide big issues by continual online referendums instead of letting big money bribes to politicians make the law and above all, never vote for conservatives:

Past Member
Past Member 5 years ago

It is amazing to me that our species has accepted a governmental authority that sections OUR LAND into so-called "parks" and then determines it will "close" the parks -- in an effort to prevent people from accessing the land. There is absolutely no legitimacy to any of this and if we would stop giving this insane government legitimacy, it would disappear. They cannot prevent people from accessing public land. This whole damn thing is a charade.