START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x
1,318,618 people care about Politics

Is It Time to Close Food Banks and Feeding Programs?

Is It Time to Close Food Banks and Feeding Programs?
  • 1 of 3

Social policy in the some of the world’s wealthiest countries has failed. Countries in which large numbers of the populace have to rely on food banks or other charitable feeding programs have divided their citizens into “us” and “them” and tarred “them” with the brush of “less worthy.”

No matter how fresh and healthy the food, no matter how barrier-free the application process, no matter how friendly and helpful the staff, food banks are a humiliating and inadequate means for governments to avoid responsibility for basic human justice, which includes the fundamental right to be free from hunger.

Food banks started as emergency measures in the 1980s but quickly became institutionalized within the non-profit sector. Thirty years later they continue to rely on charitable donations to fund their operations and to feed the masses who come through their doors. As Elaine Power wrote in July 25 in an essay for the Globe and Mail (“It’s time to close Canada’s food banks”):

Food banks have become a serious obstacle in the fight against poverty. By promising to “end hunger” by feeding hungry Canadians, they provide a comforting illusion that no one is hungry – or if they are, it’s their own fault. They shelter us from the harsh reality that millions lack the basic necessities of life.

Food banks have spread throughout the richest nations of the world. France has them. So do Germany, the Netherlands and Belgium. Jill Reilly wrote in the April 18th Guardian that UK food banks fed over 60,000 people last year and expect to feed over 100,000 this year. Food Banks Canada says a staggering 900,000 Canadians turn to them every month. Feeding America‘s network of food banks says it feeds 37 million Americans each year. Foodbank Australia provides food for 88,000 meals every day, 80 percent of it to low-income families.

Next: Food Banks As Signs of Moral Deficit

  • 1 of 3

Read more: , , , , ,

Photos 1 and 3: Thinkstock; Photo 2: Boston Food Bank, via Wikimedia Commons

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

214 comments

+ add your own
4:53PM PDT on Oct 12, 2012

hmmm

1:58AM PDT on Aug 30, 2012

I believe in giving to food pantries and soup kitchens. Too many people would starve to death without them, so I thank God they are around to help.

12:33PM PDT on Aug 29, 2012

Now Man reveals his true face, the face of to many that could care a less about the poor, or children not getting enough to eat. Notice the Flat-Out implication, (WE, I've been there)is how somehow people are lazy, leeches,bums, forgetting that we only have today, and tomorrow one could find themselves in the very same position. It's like saying if you don't have money for College, just ask your parents, since we all have parents with bank accounts here and offshore (LIAR, Tax-dodger, 14% on 20,000,000.?). All of you making these Judgements have you ever been to a food bank, ever volunteered at one, or volunteered to help ANYONE? You've built yourself large, Expensively furnished, GLASS Houses, so watch out for the glass, for we all live in one to varying degrees.

2:53AM PDT on Aug 29, 2012

Wow, Martin, pretty cynical. The food banks around here are funded by nobody. They are run completely from donations......private people, retailers, etc. Without donations, they'd close down. I believe our local one has only one paid employee.......the manager and I don't know who pays him. Everyone else is a volunteer.

2:10AM PDT on Aug 29, 2012

The UK government is big on supplanting tax-funded welfare for those they've displaced, with charitable giving. It's all part of their usual trick of "replacing" something instead of simply scrapping it, with something which they know won't work or which they'll quietly ditch a few years later.

Food banks funded through donations imply that the very existence of these people is under the ken and at the discretion of the rich. The reality is they've stolen from these people their capacity to make a living.

1:47AM PDT on Aug 29, 2012

Stella, I think it's fairly obvious that food banks differ from community to community. I live in rural Pierce County (Washington State) and the food bank here is very community oriented. My daughter and youngest grandson are now staying with me and she has signed up because neither of them has any income. She had to provide mail showing my address to be eligible. Where she was living, the food bank doesn't come close to the one here, according to her. I've seen stories on TV about food banks in Seattle and they don't seem to compare, either.

Maybe the rules about permanent addresses can be manipulated, and all I know is that this one will not accept a Post Office box as one. A physical street address must be used. Since it is so rural, probably very few homeless. The physical address is to prevent abuse of the system. I'm sure people do exchange stuff outside sometimes, but just never have seen that happen. Food baskets tend to all contain the same stuff......just more of the items if more people living in that home. I have had people approach me when I'm gettng the outdated "critter bread" and ask me if they could have certain things.....certainly they can! I get it for my horses only. Not sure why they didn't just take it off the shelf before I got there at closing time, though.

12:49AM PDT on Aug 29, 2012

Diane L. at the local food bank I went to they also required a permanent address, with proofs of that address, but those who were homeless were allowed to use a P.O. Box that was offered to them at the welfare stations. If they did not have at least that address, then they were just tough out of luck. And as I stated in my previous post, the people found their own solution for such situations which was to exchange foods with each other to get what they needed.

11:47PM PDT on Aug 28, 2012

Summer, you're still whining. If you can't afford food, period on what you earn or receive in welfare, disability, wherever your income is derived, then what food banks provide is better than the alternative. NOBODY suggested or stated that it was the best choices available and why would it be? If food banks provided what you are suggesting they SHOULD, then maybe I should just refuse my pension and state only my S.S. as income so I can qualify to get food baskets from them, as it sounds a whole lot better than what I can buy for myself now. I eat pretty well, since I actually DO have my own veggie garden to supplement what I have to buy, as well as berry bushes and fruit trees. Winter is harder, but then I also have a freezer so I get by.

It sounds like you've "made your own bed" and you are complaining about the results of your bed making. I don't mean to criticize you personally, but is anyone forcing you to live where you do, drive a car and work as a janitor (and I know most janitors earn a pretty good hourly wage)? Your husband is a student. Fine. Many students work full time as well, not just on the week-end. Life's tough.

11:43PM PDT on Aug 28, 2012

On thing is clear about all of this. There are no easy answers. I myself had to recently rely on a local food bank due to my car being the middle one of a five car pile-up. (My car got squished, thankfully, there were no injuries.) Unfortunately, the accident was a larger than normal one for me as I literally used it for my livelihood, and even without that caveat there's ZERO public transport in my area (nearest stop is about 6 miles away, and the second nearest stop is over 20 miles away). While it be sound easy to just get another job, in this area it certainly isn't. I've been looking for a "real" job for the last 4 years without success. So, no car meant no income until the insurance got off its bum and paid up (that took a month, literally). I am thankful for the local food bank. And I know I'm not the only one. I agree that certain things like food and shelter should indeed be a basic human right. Finding a way to make that happen, particularly with some groups trying to call that Socialism and wanting nothing to do with it, is the catch. Finding a way to overcome the stigma is another one. I wish I had the answers. I'd even settle for having some suggestions. Unfortunately, I currently have neither.

11:35PM PDT on Aug 28, 2012

I'm not complaining that we didn't get cavier. I was happy to get what we did. Very happy. I was correcting this impression that what you get at food banks is YUMMY fresh healthy good food that anyone would be so happy to have. Healthy? Good food? FRESH? ROFL. No, it is not. It is the dregs. It is better than digging through a dumpster or going hungry - which I have also done, thank you. Yes, I appreciate it, and I appreciate that people probably worked hard to get it for us. I was working full time as a janitor at the time BTW. My husband was a full time student who worked at day labor on his non-school days, like Saturday and Sunday. At that time poverty level for two was considered to be $900 a month - you had to be making less than that for SNAP. This regardless of where you lived - and where we lived rent alone was almost $500 a month, plus bills, plus car payment and insurance, plus his school costs... but yeah, yeah, only SCUM need food banks and SNAP.

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

ads keep care2 free
Story idea? Want to blog? Contact the editors!
ads keep care2 free



Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.