START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x
575,594 people care about Real Food

Is Processed Food Safe? The FDA Doesn’t Know

  • 2 of 3

The 10,000+ identified chemicals are the ones regulators are aware of because industry petitioned them. However, the FDA offers an escape clause. The Pew Health Group describes it this way:

The manufacturer or a trade association decides a chemical’s use is “generally recognized as safe” or, in industry parlance, a “GRAS substance,” based on the opinion of experts in the field using published studies. In this case, it need not notify FDA, and the public has no involvement in the safety decision.

If the field experts were free of industry influence and had enough money to carry out independent studies, that might work. However, what that really means is that the fox is guarding the henhouse.

It is not difficult for a new ingredient to receive the GRAS (generally regarded as safe) stamp of approval if the scientists doing the research are working for or funded by the food processor. With the GRAS designation, the chemical goes straight into food. The manufacturer may run it by the FDA but is not required to do so. If they do, all the FDA can offer is a safety determination, which means no more than, “We don’t know if it is safe, but it looks as if your research was adequate.”

The Chicago Tribune characterizes the system this way:

But even when the FDA does examine safety determinations, at no point does it affirm the safety of the product. In fact, it specifically notes in each letter that the agency has “not made its own determination of the GRAS status.”

In 2010 the Government Accountability Office (GAO) issued a report that took the FDA to task. Among the troubling issues raised by the report, “FDA Should Strengthen Its Oversight of Food Ingredients Determined to Be Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS),”were these:

  • The FDA lacks standards for how GRAS determinations should be made
  • Although they are supposed to reconsider GRAS substances in light of new research, they have not even responded to concerns about salt and trans fats, hardly new issues
  • FDA has no idea whether companies track new information about their GRAS substances
  • FDA has allowed nanomaterials to enter the food supply with no oversight

Next: What Is a Consumer To Do?

  • 2 of 3

Read more: , , , , , ,

Photo 1 from jazzijava; Photo 2: from Helge Höpfner via Wikimedia Commons; Photo 3: Thinkstock

quick poll

vote now!

Loading poll...

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

95 comments

+ add your own
6:05AM PDT on Sep 25, 2013

Thank you Cathryn, for Sharing this!

8:24PM PDT on Sep 25, 2012

It's best to eat as little processed food as you can. It's not going to kill you but it can make you fat and sluggish.

9:46PM PDT on Sep 14, 2012

Right On!

3:44AM PDT on Sep 14, 2012

The FDA works for agribusiness. We all have to do our own research.

2:13AM PDT on Sep 14, 2012

IS it safe? Is it good for you?

6:41PM PDT on Sep 13, 2012

What is wrong with REAL food? We should not real dangerous chemicals.

1:27PM PDT on Sep 13, 2012

thanks

10:43AM PDT on Sep 13, 2012

Good to know.

3:48AM PDT on Sep 12, 2012

Not good.

12:09AM PDT on Sep 12, 2012

No wonder the FDA stands for Full of Dumb Arses!

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

ads keep care2 free
Story idea? Want to blog? Contact the editors!
ads keep care2 free

more from causes




Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.