START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x
930,229 people care about Women's Rights

Is Sarah Palin A Feminist? And If Not, Is Feminism “Too Divisive”?

Is Sarah Palin A Feminist?  And If Not, Is Feminism “Too Divisive”?

In light of the past couple of weeks, it seems that writers who bemoaned the lack of self-avowed feminists should have been more careful what they wished for.  Although the debate over whether Sarah Palin is a feminist stretches back to the contentious 2008 presidential campaign, a new firestorm of controversy has erupted in the wake of Palin’s declaration that conservative women (specifically, those who oppose abortion rights) are responsible for an “emerging…feminist identity.”  Earlier in the month, the issue was invoked on a more modest scale by Colleen Carroll Campbell, who pointed to growing numbers of women who “reject the false dichotomy of abortion-centric feminism that says respect for human dignity is a zero-sum game in which a woman can win only if her unborn child loses.”  And the growing pack of Palin’s “Mama Grizzlies,” the women of the GOP who are “tough enough to say what they think,” are creating a media splash in advance of the midterm elections in November.  Feminism seems to be the new place to be – even the Tea Partiers are getting in on the action.

The reaction from progressive feminists was swift and incisive.  In an op-ed for the Washington Post, Jessica Valenti rejected the notion that Palin could successfully align herself with the feminist movement, writing,

“[Palin's "feminism" is] an empty rallying call to women who are disdainful of or apathetic to women’s rights, who want to make abortion and emergency contraception illegal, who would cut funding to the Violence Against Women Act and who fight same-sex marriage rights….Given that so-called conservative feminists don’t support women’s rights, how can they paint their movement as pro-woman? Why are they not being laughed out of the room?”

At Salon, Rebecca Traister acknowledged that “Feminism is not — despite the best efforts of opponents to paint it as such — a selective club,” and went on to conclude that the word will go to whoever wants it most.  Her hope, she writes, is that the people who prevail will be those “who don’t want to see “women’s liberation” divorced from notions of equal opportunity and instead reframed as Ayn Rand-ian survival of the richest or most privileged.”

The third round of the debate was begun this weekend by Amy Siskind in a column for the Huffington Post, in which she bluntly declared that “[the feminist] construct is divisive, proactively exclusionary and openly hostile towards women of different ideologies. Achieving gender equality is impossible in a framework where some of women are viewed as less equal.”  Instead of a “feminist” movement, Siskind said, a “pro-woman” movement should, and would prevail.

I have been watching the frenzy from afar because it seemed, well, divisive, and a little pointless.  I am a progressive feminist who is consistently appalled by pretty much everything that Palin does, right down to her tweets, and remain skeptical of Palin’s claims that first-wave feminists would consider themselves pro-life, if only because it’s impossible to apply such anachronistic labels to historical figures.  But while I sympathize with Valenti’s reaction, I disagree with her attempts to demarcate the boundaries of feminism.  Like Traister, I think it’s impossible to make feminism a closed club – indeed, such an idea runs directly counter to feminism’s moral center.  And I have always been irritated by the notion that feminists must adhere to some sort of dogma, when the movement’s short history is speckled with figures who I admire and respect, but with whom I fundamentally disagree (Mary Daly is the first to spring to mind). 

But Siskind’s column piqued my interest more than the others, not just because of her calls for a new name, but because of the anger that she seems to harbor toward the feminist establishment (sans Sarah, the Grizzlies and the rest).  Siskind writes:

“The feminists who are now gripping onto the f-word so tightly that their knuckles turn white, do not support women. And not just women of different ideologies like Sarah Palin. Many of these same feminists did not support pro-choice, Democrat, Women’s Rights Are Human Rights Hillary Clinton in her effort to become our country’s first woman president….As I consider “feminism” and “pro-women,” here’s my visceral reaction: Feminism feels like a trip back to junior high school full of mean girls — ganging up and cliques that exclude. I barely made it out alive the first time and I’m not eager to go back.”

Threads of PUMA pride notwithstanding (I have zero desire to resurrect the Clinton/Obama feminism debate of two years ago and am definitely not going to go there – if you have any doubt that feminists can support Obama, watch Melissa Harris-Lacewell’s conversation with Gloria Steinem about the two candidates), I do have some sympathy for Siskind’s “mean girls” complaint.  There’s a lot of unnecessary tetching and quibbling within the feminist community, and I would like to see more support for varied ideas and real mentorship within the feminist movement, rather than arguments over which generation is doing a better job of supporting abortion rights.

But Siskind is off-base when she suggests that a new “pro-women” movement, led by a pack of “Mama Grizzlies,” is in order, and that’s because although I fully support the right of all female politicians to espouse any policy, however ridiculous, that doesn’t mean that as a feminist, I have an obligation to vote for them, or overlook the fact that their policies would reverse the trend toward gender equality supported by the current administration.  In addition, I think the focus on abortion has gotten out of control, and I personally would like to see more conversation between pro-choicers and pro-lifers about ways to reduce the number of abortions (something that I see few pro-lifers doing, a fundamental hypocrisy that has always bothered me).

In the meantime, I wonder why we care so much about whether Sarah Palin considers herself a feminist.  And the response reveals disturbing anxieties among progressive feminists about their own ability to bring “real feminism” into people’s lives, regardless of who’s using the word.  At the end of the day, we can’t stop Palin from calling herself a feminist – what we can do is prove that progressive feminism will make actual steps toward gender equality, instead of moving us backward.  After all, actions speak louder than labels, and Palin’s track record on women’s rights is appalling.

So where does this leave me?  With Kate Harding, who at the end of her excellent piece for Jezebel, writes, “If they’re stealing our language to broaden their appeal, then we must have done something right along the way.”  If nothing else, I’m happy that feminism is getting so much air time, and I can only hope that more progressives will take on the work of bridge-building that seems so desperately needed.  But for now, feminism seems to be the new black, and that’s something to appreciate, albeit cautiously.

Read more: , , , , , , ,

Photo from Flickr.

quick poll

vote now!

Loading poll...

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

111 comments

+ add your own
12:42PM PST on Nov 7, 2010

Sarah Palin is a scary person. She will do anything and say anything for attention. Get her out of the lime light!

6:23AM PDT on Jul 11, 2010

I hated this woman since she started the war on wolves.

8:04PM PDT on Jul 8, 2010

Can a woman be pro-life and still be a feminist, which is to support womens rights. I support womens rights but happen to be pro-life. Guys I am sorry to each his own but I believe that abortion is murder at any stage of life. I can understand some abortions are needed and wanted and that is up to that person to make that choice and I would never ever put them down for it. But there are people using abortion like birth control..c'mon that is not right. Why can't these grown women be more responsible. As far as Sarah Palin goes I think she is a feminist and there is no doubt. I think women should admire her for all she has done. But instead they hate her because she is pro-life and a republican and that is just not a good reason. I did not agree with Hillary but I admire her for all she has done. Anyways that is how I feel!

2:49PM PDT on Jul 6, 2010

Amelia, thank you for your thoughtful, intelligent observations.

I've read down a few comments, and there are some great ones. I'm 65 and worked in the 70s for womens rights -- I do not say this, as a badge or to be exclusive, but to put some perspective on what feminism is. I'm glad that new generations of women just accept their equality -- that was our purpose, for our sisters and daughters.

Sarah Palin is no more a feminist than I am a tree. Feminists want to share the equality with their sisters.

She is a female politician who uses women to get votes. There is only one woman she cares about, and that is Sarah Palin.

She has schemed and lied and stolen her way up the ladder. She loves the perks, but not the responsibility. Leaders do not quit. She saw a way to make more money, and gave that utterly phony speech to quit the governorship.

She pretends to be a serious politician, all the while winking and wiggling her way across the stage. Sex is great, in one's home, but her antics are a wet dream of rightie men. True feminists do not use their bodies as leverage.

She uses the buzz words like "mama" & "cubs", because all mothers would give their lives for their children (ALL, Sarah, -- liberal "mamas", as well as right-wing "mamas"). But it is all a ploy -- and it makes me really hot that she sullies the name of feminism with her cheap tricks.

She dishonors the meaning of feminism, and all the feminists who have labored so hard for all

10:24AM PDT on Jun 14, 2010

I think it is worthy to challenge the notion of feminism because even though historically each pivotal issue has thus far been advocated by "liberal/progressives" (as the parties was defined by the times), each, evolving, pivotal issue was also indicative of the era; suffrage/voting rights; independence; sexual freedom, pro choice; equal pay, etc. Currently, of course old issues need to be revisited and new ones indicative of our era, career single mom's, etc, women in any political party, can and are advocating for these issues and many more. But the key word I am stuck on is, "advocating". By definition FEMINISM is; "ADVOCATING for the political, social and economic equality of men and women". Where I believe that S.P. may be influential for some, she is not "advocating" but merely influencing. It may be semantics but words and their definitions are extremely important, we cannot just give them our own interpretation, personal meaning or definition. She has not gone out on a platform (small, large, political or private) to fight for or advocate for any issue specific to the equality for women in our society. Many even argue she has worked against it but I don't believe the debate can even get to that stage because she has not performed the act of advocating. INFLUENCE is not ADVOCACY, it can further a cause but it is passive. As to the issue of pro-choice, please lets open this vital dialogue. It is a matter of life and death for EVERYONE concerned.

10:42PM PDT on Jun 13, 2010

The only gripe I have with SP is the animal issue...wolves...et al.

She is doing more to give WOMEN power (OK why would you not ask your hubby's opinion? doesn't mean she is gonna do what he says now does it? a marriage is a partnership right?) WHY do powerful women have to be "liberal" ??

Oh and to Claire. No....honey no. I am a single 45 yr old woman! I pay all my bills myself and am obedient to NO ONE except what is right. I am not something to be manipulated ....

Claire .... you are being manipulated by the media to think the way you do.

love you all. Gotta go love the conversations! even if we don't agree what a great venue to share! :)

10:28PM PDT on Jun 13, 2010

Cathy G. I highly doubt that Sarah Palin would ever wear a Burka much less force any woman to do so. You are showing a quite misogynist POV about her. I do not agree with her 100%....I do love her honesty and .... I think other people in this world will make (no wait FORCE) you to wear a burka B4 Palin does.

10:17AM PDT on Jun 13, 2010

Palin makes women look ignorant. She tries to take our freedoms away and make it look like it's done out of caring. In reality she's taking women backwards and eventually to wearing burkas.

11:32PM PDT on Jun 12, 2010

Sarah Palin a feminist? Ha! Funny how her daughter "chose to keep her baby" yet she is anti-choice. She was deemed by "evangelicals" that she had "permission from her husband to run for office". As a pro-life woman, she needs permission? She is NOT a feminist. While she's at it, she can stop shooting the wolves and injuring the local ecosystem.

1:56PM PDT on Jun 12, 2010

Sarah Palin is NOT a feminist. She doesn't promote gender equality, she promotes the same old mysogynistic views. Ugh. I hate that she calls herself a feminist.

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

Good at water conservation, free university, somebody gets it! Congrats to Germany, may we all follow…

A number of years ago I saw a maple tree full of evolving chrysallis into Monarch butterflies here in…

I also wonder how manyof these so called defendants sort of enjoyed it and it scared the hell out of…

meet our writers

Steve Williams Steve Williams is a passionate supporter of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Trans (LGBT) rights, human... more
Story idea? Want to blog? Contact the editors!
ads keep care2 free

more from causes

Animal Welfare

Causes Canada

Causes UK

Children

Civil Rights

Education

Endangered Wildlife

Environment & Wildlife

Global Development

Global Warming

Health Policy

Human Rights

LGBT rights

Politics

Real Food

Trailblazers For Good

Women's Rights




Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.