START A PETITION 27,000,000 members: the world's largest community for good

Kids in the UK Should Decide What Books They Like, Regardless of Gender

Kids in the UK Should Decide What Books They Like, Regardless of Gender

Books are meant for everyone, right? Sadly, when it comes to children’s fiction that’s not quite true. Many book publishers still target different books at boys and girls by applying gender stereotypes, and that’s a problem.

A campaign in the UK called Let Books be Books is gaining momentum and forcing the publishing world to take stock about how it targets children’s books. The campaign calls on publishers to ditch gender specific titles because, the campaign argues, by gender marking books publishers are essentially reinforcing stereotypes, particularly about young girls and how their interests should be things like clothes and beauty and being little princesses. Similarly, gender marking books may also stifle young boys whose interests do not fall neatly into the camps of sport or adventure.

Tessa Trabue from Let Toys Be Toys has explained the campaign as being important so that children don’t feel limited: “Every child is different and has their own individual taste; it makes no sense to push boys and girls towards separate books. We believe that books are for everyone; children should have the freedom to read about or color in robots, fairies, pirates or flowers, without publishers telling them otherwise.”

The campaign has garnered strong support among leading UK authors including poet laureate Carol Ann Duffy, the “His Dark Materials”†author Phillip Pullman, and significantly, children’s†laureate Malorie Blackman.

The campaign has been criticized as a move to ban books and police what gets written. This is unfair. The campaign is actually a measured approach to the problem of gender-specific books. It does recognize the reality: boys and girls often have different interests. No one can dispute that. Yet at the same time, boys and girls should not be introduced so young to the implication that their gender should in any way limit their interests.

Examples the campaign is targeting include Usborne’s Illustrated Classics for Boys, which the publisher describes as “a collection of stories of action, adventure and daring-do [sic] suitable for boys.” Compare that to its title Illustrated Stories for Girls, which contains “brand new stories about mermaids, fairies, princesses and dolls.”

Usborne has now joined a growing list of book publishers that, recognizing these gender stereotypes, will no longer package titles in ways that specifically aim at gender parity.

However, other book retailers have said they won’t stop selling books in this way. Michael O’Mara, whose company controls Buster Books, has said that gender specific books are easier to sell and it’s a question of supply and demand, telling the Independent:

“It’s a fact of life how a very large percentage of people shop when buying for kids, do it by sex. We know for a fact that when they are shopping on Amazon, they quite often type in ‘books for boys’ and ‘books for girls.’ All boys donít like one thing and all girls the other, but the fact is lots of boys like the same things and lots of girls like the same things. We can’t ignore the fact that they are definitely different.”

It seems that the Independent found this line of argument unconvincing because literary editor Katy Guest has pledged that under her leadership, the Independent on Sunday and affiliated Independent publications will no longer review books that explicitly indulge in gender stereotyping. Wrote Guest in a comment piece for the Independent:

“Any Girls’ Book of Boring Princesses that crosses my desk will go straight into the recycling pile along with every Great Big Book of Snot for Boys. If you are a publisher with enough faith in your new book that you think it will appeal to all children, we’ll be very happy to hear from you. But the next Harry Potter or Katniss Everdeen will not come in glittery pink covers. So we’d thank you not to send us such books at all.”

A number of retailers including Waterstones have also said that they already don’t or in the future will not carry explicitly gender stereotyping books or create gender specific displays.

In case we think that this is only a narrow problem, concerns have been raised in the past that literature by female authors is routinely given “chick lit” or “romance” covers, even if the books don’t fall into those categories (see this great experiment by author Maureen Johnson for more). There’s also the problem of the overt sexualization of the female body in sci-fi and fantasy covers and how that also needs to be tackled. Clearly, the publishing industry like most industries is still one that is evolving when it comes to issues of gender, sexism and sexualization.

As such, the Let Books be Books campaign is a force for positive change. Again, it is not about banning books, but rather discouraging book sellers from falling back on easy gender stereotypes that could be limiting for children. In essence, Let Books be Books seems to be about letting kids be kids whatever their likes or dislikes — something we can all agree is a worthwhile goal.

Read more: , , , , ,

Photo credit: Thinkstock.

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it


+ add your own
4:32AM PDT on Mar 26, 2014

With their parents consent, children should read whatever they like!

11:04PM PDT on Mar 25, 2014

I wish every child could feel the joy of loving reading, and could choose any book he or she wants without anyone steering the child in some gender-based direction.

9:48AM PDT on Mar 25, 2014


11:19AM PDT on Mar 24, 2014

Agree, but it is the parents´ responsability to see what their kids are reading.

7:57PM PDT on Mar 23, 2014

of course, everyone should be allowed to read anything they like

4:53PM PDT on Mar 23, 2014

An important awareness campaign

8:45AM PDT on Mar 23, 2014

Very interesting, kids should be able to read & colour any books they want.

2:53AM PDT on Mar 23, 2014


2:38AM PDT on Mar 23, 2014

I read Nancy Drew, The Hardy Boys, Boxcar Children, all of Walter Farley's books; The Black Stallion, Flame .... i had never a thought of the sex of the characters (which is becoming really prominent now). I enjoyed reading, Jim Kjelljegaard, C.S. Lewis, the Narnia chronicles strong girls, a weak boy and an evil queen...and Susan Cooper....The Dark is Rising series, favorite series when I was in my teens..For a while I loved romances! whatever, get out of my face! Loved Shades of grey...all 3 did you read them all? Left Behind series was so engrossing I read most of them all one summer
I read so much when I was growing up, had nothing to do with gender, if teachers can encourage anything they should encourage learning....let the kid figure it out

1:56AM PDT on Mar 23, 2014

Kate R. interesting aspect your comment has. I think here men are way more respected in horse related sports.

add your comment

Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

Care2 - Be Extraordinary - Start a Care2 Petition
ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

This is terrible! We can't let them get away with this! Save the bears, stop the hunts!

Yes, I would love to have a neighbor like Ted. The pup is lucky that he did.

Saw this on the news. That is one lucky dog. I don't understand why people aren't more protective and…

meet our writers

Steve Williams Steve Williams is a passionate supporter of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Trans (LGBT) rights, human... more
ads keep care2 free

Select names from your address book   |   Help

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.

site feedback


Problem on this page? Briefly let us know what isn't working for you and we'll try to make it right!