START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x
570,070 people care about Real Food

A Lot of Fizz? Banning Soda in Schools Has Little Impact

A Lot of Fizz? Banning Soda in Schools Has Little Impact

State laws banning the sale of soda but not of other sweetened drinks in schools have had almost no impact on students’ consumption of sugary drinks. The study, which was published in the Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, considered some 7,000 public middle-school students in 40 states and found a result that does not seem too surprising, if you’ve observed the eating habits and general disdain for nutrition of many an adolescent. While sodas were no longer for sale in vending machines in schools, other sweetened drinks (such as sports drinks and sweetened fruit drinks) were still available, and students simply chose those.

In fact, students in the states with the laws banning soda still consumed the same amount of sugary drinks as students in states without the laws.

Furthermore, while laws that banned all sugary drinks in schools resulted in students having (obviously) less access to them, students’ consumption of such drinks remained the same. That is, bans on soft drinks in schools did not influence students’ consumption of such drinks as a whole at all.

The middle-school students in the study were followed from 2004 – 2007, about the same time that many states starting enacting laws banning soft drinks in public schools.

With obesity on the rise and teenagers getting about 15 percent of their daily calories from beverages, health groups like the Institute of Medicine have pushed for the removal of all sweetened beverages from schools, and some states have put in place all-out bans on sweetened drinks. California, for example, became the first state to ban the sale of soft drinks in grade schools, in 2003, and one city, Boston, moved earlier this year to forbid the sale and promotion of sugar-sweetened beverages and sodas on all city property.

But the sale of soft drinks in schools has become a lucrative revenue source for many school districts, and a number of states have been reluctant to eliminate them from schools. Some states have instituted only partial bans that remove sodas from schools but not Snapple, Gatorade and other sugary drinks.

Schools may not be quite as on board about getting kids not to drink sugary drinks as they might say they are.

Despite these limited results from the bans on soft drinks, Daniel R. Taber, an author of the study and postdoctoral research associate at the University of Illinois at Chicago, points out that the study shows that such laws “need to be comprehensive to have any positive effect at all.” With the laws, students do have reduced access to sugary drinks while in school.

One unintended consequence of the ban on soft drinks could be, though, that students could presume that the other sugary drinks are healthy. Says Taber:

“…there’s a lot of misconceptions about which beverages are healthy. Many kids think beverages like Gatorade are a healthy alternative to soda.”

Taber’s comment is revealing. Laws aside, what students need to make healthier choices is a better understanding of what’s in those colorful cans in the vending machines and why, ultimately, they’re not doing themselves any favors by drinking sugary stuff and not getting a taste for good old-fashioned water. Just because a label says “fruit” or “naturally sweetened” doesn’t mean the drink is healthy (let alone nature)l. But will students just roll their eyes on hearing about the additives and who knows what in those shiny cans?

Related Care2 Coverage

California Lawmaker Wants Statewide Tax On Sugary Drinks

NYC Mayor Wants To Ban Sugary Drinks For Food Stamp Users

Los Angeles Bans Flavored Milk in Public Schools

Food Trucks Selling Junk Food Prey On Students

 

Read more: , , , , , , , , , ,

Photo by moriza

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

79 comments

+ add your own
5:04AM PDT on May 8, 2013

Thank you for sharing.

10:48AM PST on Feb 3, 2013

I say regardless of the findings,keep it out of schools. It definitely cannot hurt.

7:23AM PDT on Mar 12, 2012

schools should NOT have vending machines... we didn't! and we were offered milk or buttermilk. water was from the fountains in the hallways...if you didn't buy lunch in the cafeteria, you brought your own... this should be instilled again... with healthier choices in cafeteria food...too many starches is almost as bad as too much sugar... once again PARENT involvement is key.

7:22AM PST on Mar 9, 2012

Water should be available free.

5:26AM PST on Dec 31, 2011

Soda definitely does not belong in schools, I wonder when this trend started, we had milk and water and that was it. But of course, it all comes down to education, the better people are educated, the better they will eat.

10:35PM PST on Nov 15, 2011

I think the point is that schools should not be allowed to sell soda to kids. If parents give their kids soda, then that is there choice. Or if kids get money from their parents, and buy soda at the mini-mart- that is their choice. But for a school to sell crap to kids and make a profit off it is not cool.

6:13AM PST on Nov 15, 2011

I would like to see schools sell water, nothing else. White sugar causes health problems, like most things ingested to excess. Diet soda contains aspartame which is neurotoxic and causes health problems.

Stupidity in American government seems to be the rule and not the exception.

6:06AM PST on Nov 15, 2011

Leah H. has said it very well - among others. Commercialism in schools is a horrible message to kids! The original ban is a good start - now get rid of the rest of the junk food!

5:17AM PST on Nov 15, 2011

I don't believe that vending machines belong schools no matter what they are selling. Schools should be commerce-free zones. It is a terrible comment on our collective values that schools ever felt they needed commercial support, because the public refuses to pony-up sufficient revenue for schools to operate without it.

This is the law of unintended consequences! We wanted cheap. Childhood obesity is what we got, and boy, is that expensive!

4:53AM PST on Nov 15, 2011

Thanks for the article.

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

ads keep care2 free

meet our writers

Kristina Chew Kristina Chew teaches and writes about ancient Greek and Latin and is Online Advocacy and Marketing... more
Story idea? Want to blog? Contact the editors!
ads keep care2 free



Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.