START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x
1,284,985 people care about Politics

Let’s Stop Calling Ourselves a Democracy

Let’s Stop Calling Ourselves a Democracy

Ask Americans what form of government the United States has, and most will tell you a “democracy.” Sadly, they would be inaccurate. The United States is not a democracy, and I don’t mean that in a contrarian “the United States government is so corrupt that you can’t even call it a democracy anymore” kind of way. Well, not just that way anyhow.

The United States is in fact a republic — always has been, even. It’s referenced in the Constitution, as well as our Pledge of Allegiance: “to the Republic for which it stands.”

The distinction between the two forms of government is significant. In a true democracy, the people weigh in on each issue and the majority rules. Rather than having politicians, everyone is a politician, and the community makes decisions as a whole. As for a republic, instead of voting on the decisions, the people vote for politicians to make all other decisions on their behalves.

Given that we live in a republic, why is it then that we are so often labeled a democracy? I see the shift as an intentional attempt to placate the population. A democracy is a significantly more empowering system, so by presenting the United States as a place where the people are making the decisions, we more readily accept the government’s flaws as our own.

Think of how often politicians and pundits remind constituents that we live in a democracy when things don’t go the way people had hoped. The implicit message is, “Tough luck, the majority doesn’t agree with you in this case.” However, that excuse doesn’t always hold water. The majority of Americans believe in the danger of climate change, yet Congress declines to do anything about it. The majority of Americans want to see Wall Street executives held accountable for the rampant fraud that crashed the economy, yet the Department of Justice refuses to prosecute any involved parties. Those are the consequences of having a republic, not a democracy.

The closest that some states come to pure democracy is in the cases of ballot measures. Voters are directly tasked with giving a “yes” or “no” to initiatives, with the majority determining the outcome. We’ve seen this work well in cases where the will of the people overrides the legislators’ inaction by setting new tax rates or term limits. We’ve also seen this work poorly when multiple states banned gay marriage – clearly, the majority doesn’t always protect the rights of the minority.

I’m not necessarily advocating for a democracy. Is the average American informed enough politically to make the right decisions for this country? Unfortunately, I’m not remotely confident that that would be true. Nonetheless, at least some of the prevailing political ignorance and apathy on the part of American citizens can be attributed to the fact that this country is a republic. After taking most of the power out of the hands of the population, there is less incentive for people to keep updated on the day’s issues.

Still, I do suggest that we strip the word “democracy” from our vocabulary when discussing the United States. Given the current state of politics, it’s more important than ever to emphasize that we live in a heavily flawed republic.

Republics aren’t bad in principle. If elected officials genuinely represented the interests of their constituents, it would be an efficient way to make decisions for the country. Instead, we see politicians prioritize corporate interests. The Supreme Court just augmented the influence that a handful of wealthy people can have over elections.  Unscrupulous gerrymandering essentially pre-determines most elections anyway. Looking at these extenuating factors, it’s clear that Americans barely even have a republic at this point, let alone a democracy, given that their opinions are almost irrelevant in choosing who (and how) they will be represented.

At least by calling the United States a “republic” moving forward, Americans on the whole will be better informed of the kind of rule we live under. Changing our description will help to illuminate the lack of power the people actually have; it’s these politicians who we almost universally despise calling the shots, yet the system prevents us from disposing of them.

Perhaps this realization could help to motivate some much needed reform. In that sense, consider calling us a “republic” a political statement as much as a factual one.

Read more: , , , , , , ,

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

153 comments

+ add your own
10:43AM PDT on Jul 2, 2014

We are doomed to war.

1:49AM PDT on May 13, 2014

How western world leaders sees democrazy:

http://www.care2.com/news/member/181225451/3769599

http://www.nationofchange.org/blood-soaked-us-has-no-business-opposing-sovereignty-plebiscites-1399909321

1:09PM PDT on Apr 19, 2014

Wow one of te few times I can agree with Erid and Sarah H

7:35AM PDT on Apr 19, 2014

Well said Sarah. How many in Congress actually worked for a living? Congress should go back to being part time, so much of what they pass is not under the federal govrnments athority.
Prinston University just came out with a study that concluded the USA is now an Oligargy. I would provide a link but I'm on my phone.

4:05AM PDT on Apr 19, 2014

We need to really think about who we vote for. Washington DC seems to corrupt even the most earnest official who goes there. That is why our founding fathers didn't want career politician but part-time. They were meant to serve a few years. then go back home and pick up their real career back up.

5:01PM PDT on Apr 18, 2014

It is time We The People stood up and reminded our elected officers that they are, in fact, elected servants to ALL The People, not just their wealthy friends.

7:53PM PDT on Apr 17, 2014

" ...the system prevents us from disposing of them."

Not quite true.We have elections.

3:18PM PDT on Apr 14, 2014

ty for an important and interesting article. when I just saw the headline, I was thinking, "plutocracy". but I had forgotten some basic civics facts. thanks!

7:04AM PDT on Apr 14, 2014

“You can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all of the time, but you cannot fool all of the people all the time.” To fool all of the people all the time has often been attempted, but it has always failed. In past eons these attempts were made locally, but recently the attempt has been, and is still being made on a global scale, but far too many of you are now seeing through the enormous lies and deceits that the power-brokers are presenting to you through their media accomplices as being the truth. And you are sharing your knowledge of this so that those who would control you can no longer do so.

Even on the mainstream media it is now quite apparent that something major is amiss. The controllers are no longer in control, and their panic is showing as more and more of their lies and deceits are being disclosed and brought out into the open for all to see. Their hidden agendas are no longer hidden, the dots are being connected, and the massive corruption in which they and their families and minions have been engaged are being revealed.

8:48AM PDT on Apr 13, 2014

Excellent article, thanks!

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

Care2 - Be Extraordinary - Start a Care2 Petition
ads keep care2 free
CONTACT THE EDITORS

Recent Comments from Causes

ads keep care2 free

more from causes

Animal Welfare

Causes Canada

Causes UK

Children

Civil Rights

Education

Endangered Wildlife

Environment & Wildlife

Global Development

Global Warming

Health Policy

Human Rights

LGBT rights

Politics

Real Food

Trailblazers For Good

Women's Rights




Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.