START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x
906,970 people care about Women's Rights

L’Oreal Forced to Pull Airbrushed Advertisements

L’Oreal Forced to Pull Airbrushed Advertisements

 

The British Advertising Standards Authority forced the cosmetics giant L’Oreal to pull advertising campaigns featuring Julia Roberts and Christy Turlington, after upholding MP Jo Swinson’s allegation that the ads were too airbrushed. Swinson has been long been part of the effort to end the practice of photoshopping models until they no longer resemble real people.

The ASA supported Swinson’s complaint, ruling that the ads were exaggerated and misleading. According to Swinson, the images had been manipulated to the point where they were “not representative of the results the product could achieve.”

In their defense, L’Oreal released red-carpet photos of the women to prove that any changes (and there were, they admitted, changes) were “not relevant.” They said that the images still showed signs of aging, but then added, rather defensively, that these were “aspirational” photos. You know it’s a bad sign when even Julia Roberts has to be airbrushed to reach the beauty to which L’Oreal wants us to “aspire.”

The cosmetics company also pointed out that the advertisements were produced by professional styling, flattering light, and an excellent photographer. The ASA acknowledged that many factors had gone into the unrealistic image that emerged, not just digital manipulation, but concluded that “on the basis of the evidence we had received we could not conclude that the ad image accurately illustrated what effect the product could achieve, and that the image had not been exaggerated by digital post production techniques.”

In other words: not even L’Oreal’s makeup can make Julia Roberts look that good.

“Pictures of flawless skin and super-slim bodies are all around, but they don’t reflect reality,” said Swinson. “Excessive airbrushing and digital manipulation techniques have become the norm, but both Christy Turlington and Julia Roberts are naturally beautiful women who don’t need retouching to look great. This ban sends a powerful message to advertisers let’s get back to reality.”

Related Stories:

AMA: Photoshopping Hazardous to Women’s Health

Dating Site Kicks Out 30,000 Members for Being “Ugly”

Half of Teen Girls Would Change the Way They Look (VIDEO)

Read more: , , , , , , ,

Photo from dreamgirlpumpkincate210 via flickr

quick poll

vote now!

Loading poll...

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

69 comments

+ add your own
5:48PM PDT on Sep 4, 2011

GOOD!

10:01PM PDT on Aug 4, 2011

With food ads, photographers are allowed to create a product that is appealing but has little relation to the actual item the consumer receives. Why should cosmetics, clothing, or any other consumer goods be held to a higher standard?

7:48AM PDT on Aug 4, 2011

The ads should be as appealing as possible, whatever it takes. The idea, here, people, is to sell a product. Why should any company be penalized for putting out their best product, whatever it took to get there. Is there not any freedom in advertising?

2:52AM PDT on Aug 3, 2011

The photo at left appears soft and beautiful to me and the one at right suggests a canvas-like object to be viewed and judged rather than a living, feeling entity with whom to engage.

10:42PM PDT on Aug 1, 2011

"REALITY?" Political rhetoric is so scrutinized, spun and vetted that by the time it's released, NOT ONE SPECK of "reality" remains..." Late-nite comedians' schticks are so fine-tuned you wonder if this "funny" guy could even recite his name and address without rehearsals, handlers and cue cards.... Ads for anything and everything are steeped in psychology, worked and reworked by ad men and focus groups to finagle the dollars out of our pockets as efficiently as possible... Banks and oil companies (et al) employ the best and the brightest to paint them as unsung heroes, only out to serve the common man...

Yes, "Reality" has become a very scarce commodity indeed. But hey: let's get 'em to stop airbrushing those darn models and celebrities! That'll show 'em we're mad as hell and we ain't gonna stand for it any longer, by golly.

12:14AM PDT on Jul 31, 2011

If the ads were for clothes and the models faces were airbrushed- it wouldn't be a problem. But when the ad is for make-up, then the airbrushing is very deceptive. Like the ads for mascara, and the models are clearly wearing lash extenders- not cool.

4:47PM PDT on Jul 29, 2011

If even those who are beautiful to begin with are airbrushed then the standard is not only set too high but it is unattainable, by ANYONE. I'm all for banning airbrushed adds.

3:01PM PDT on Jul 29, 2011

This airbrushing is ridiculous, it sends a wrong message. We are all different and beautiful in our own way.

9:14AM PDT on Jul 29, 2011

I don't know what's the problem with people, the girl from the left is way prettier than the one from the right (looks like she's made out of plastic)...

11:00PM PDT on Jul 28, 2011

It's ridiculous the lengths this 'shopping craze has gone. Nothing looks natural, everything looks flat & it's an unrealistic representation of beauty. I prefer to see all the flaws & imperfections, at least you know it's natural.

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

Care2 - Be Extraordinary - Start a Care2 Petition
ads keep care2 free
CONTACT THE EDITORS

Recent Comments from Causes

Awww, she looks too cute in her little coat. Alexander Stoyanov and his organization Animal SOS-Burgas…

Angels are to be found everywhere, and your group certainly are. May the Lord shine on your work and…

Those of you who dismiss anyone who would be persuaded to vote for reasons like this as not knowing anything,…

meet our writers

Lindsay Spangler Lindsay Spangler is a Web Editor and Producer for Care2 Causes. A recent UCLA graduate, she lives in... more
ads keep care2 free

more from causes




Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.