START A PETITION 27,000,000 members: the world's largest community for good
2,101,149 people care about Politics

Minnesota Same-Sex Marriage Foes File Suit

Minnesota Same-Sex Marriage Foes File Suit

Backers of a proposed anti-same sex marriage amendment to the Minnesota state constitution will file suit against Secretary of State Mark Ritchie and Attorney General Lori Swanson over proposed language for the ballot question.

Minnesota for Marriage, the primary backer of the amendment, are challenging the wording that Ritchie and Swanson, both members of the Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party, for changing the wording of the ballot question from what had been passed by the legislature.

The Republican-controlled legislature passed a proposed amendment that would write a same-sex marriage ban into the state’s constitution. Same-sex marriage is already illegal in Minnesota. The legislature’s bill had proposed a ballot title of “Recognition of marriage solely between one man and one woman.” The measure was symbolically vetoed by Gov. Mark Dayton, a DFLer, but under the Minnesota Constitution, the governor cannot block a constitutional amendment.

Ritchie did, however, cite the governor’s veto in announcing his title for the ballot question, “Limiting the status of marriage to opposite sex couples.” Minnesota state statutes give the secretary of state the authority to choose an “appropriate title” for an amendment, provided the Attorney General agrees with it.

“The actions of SOS Mark Ritchie and Attorney General Lori Swanson are unlawful and exceed their constitutional authority,” said State Sen. Warren Limmer, R-Maple Grove, who authored the amendment, in a statement from Minnesotans for Marriage. “It is a sad day in Minnesota when the Secretary of State and the Attorney General disregard the will of the legislature and use deceptive language.”

Minnesota United for All Families, the main group opposing the amendment, said whatever the wording ends up being, they will work to defeat it.

“We have been and will continue working across the state to spark conversations about the question Minnesotans will vote on, which is whether in 2012, our state will limit the freedom to marry for committed same-sex couples in Minnesota,” said spokesperson Kate Brickman.

Under Minnesota’s constitution, proposed amendments are placed on the ballot by majority vote of both houses of the legislature. The amendment is adopted if it receives the support of a majority of all voters, meaning that voters who vote on other questions but choose not to vote on the amendment are effectively voting against it.

Related Stories

Minnesota Swinging Away From Same-Sex Marriage Ban

The Cost of Same-Sex Marriage Bans

The Forgotten History of Gay Marriage

Read more: , , , ,

Image Credit: Fibonacci Blue

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it


+ add your own
6:49PM PDT on Jul 10, 2012

HOPE it passes!!!

5:38PM PDT on Jul 10, 2012

ALL the objections to same sex marriage and abortion are based solely on religious beliefs. Since supposedly there is a separation of church and state, I don't understand how these issues keep taking up so much energy and resources. I think they are a distraction to keep people from thinking about the REAL issues that face the whole human race - like the fact that we are on the fast track to extinction unless we clean up this planet we all depend on for little things like food and being able to eat, breathe and drink something clean that can support life.

12:42PM PDT on Jul 10, 2012

Mehmet N.- what are you talking about!???

11:50AM PDT on Jul 10, 2012

Oh lord, here we go again. I hope Minnesota doesn't end up with a court case dragging on and on and on, like we have in California.

"Give to every human being every right that you claim for yourself."
---------------------------------------Robert Ingersoll, Civil War veteran and American political leader

11:35AM PDT on Jul 10, 2012

It's ridiculous that they're even allowed to file a suit to overturn the ruling.

8:48AM PDT on Jul 10, 2012

It is interesting that the Republican Party which advocates a less intrusive government has no problem with becoming the Crotch Cops of American -- talk about intrusive!

8:20AM PDT on Jul 10, 2012

The people pushing the amendment want equal rights for everyone. Except for those who disagree with them. They need to get a life. Gay marriage will not hurt their marriges, and will acutallay make marriage stronger as it shows that marriage is a desirable thing for everyone.

8:14AM PDT on Jul 10, 2012

Good for them. Discrimination is discrimination. Our government should not dictate basic civil rights.

6:04AM PDT on Jul 10, 2012

Equal rights,for all!!!

5:13AM PDT on Jul 10, 2012

Go Minnesota...Keep moving toward respect, dignity, and equality for all.

add your comment

Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

Care2 - Be Extraordinary - Start a Care2 Petition
ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

Not exactly ethnically diverse are they? Overprivileged white kids with a few brown faces thrown in for…

Gerald: I agree that canned, preserved foods and vegetables from the garden is something to be thankful…

meet our writers

Kristina Chew Kristina Chew teaches and writes about ancient Greek and Latin and is Online Advocacy and Marketing... more
ads keep care2 free

more from causes

Animal Welfare

Causes Canada

Causes UK


Civil Rights


Endangered Wildlife

Environment & Wildlife

Global Development

Global Warming

Health Policy

Human Rights

LGBT rights


Real Food

Trailblazers For Good

Women's Rights

Select names from your address book   |   Help

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.

site feedback


Problem on this page? Briefly let us know what isn't working for you and we'll try to make it right!