As a direct result of a historic class action law suit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) Mississippi will enter into a consent decree banning the horrific practice of subjecting kids convicted as adults to solitary confinement.
The consent decree is believed to be the first of its kind and will require the state to move such kids out of a brutally violent privately run prison and into a separate stand-alone facility that is operated in accordance with juvenile justice standards and not the more punitive adult correctional standards.
The conditions the children in Mississippi are subjected to are truly outrageous. Currently children as young as 13 who have been tried and convicted as adults in Mississippi are sent to the Walnut Grove Youth Correctional Facility (WGYCF), operated by GEO Group, Inc., the nation’s second largest for-profit prison corporation.
As described in the lawsuit, GEO staff routinely peddled drugs to the teenagers in their custody, beat and sexually exploited them. They also failed to protect them from violence at the hands of older, predatory prisoners and were at times complicit in brutal attacks on juvenile prisoners.
Solitary confinement was also routinely used as a form of punishment. While in solitary the youth are held in almost complete isolation and sensory deprivation with virtually no human contact. They are denied all visits, telephone calls and fail from their families. If prison staff identify a child as suicidal–which the lawsuit shows they often do with punitive motives–that child is stripped naked except for a paper gown and denied a mattress.
The conditions described in the lawsuit should make every American sick. Since the 1990s our justice system has moved toward making it easier to try children as adults and to incarcerate them in the same harsh and dangerous conditions as adults.
The consent decree will bring an end to this unconscionable practice in Mississippi, but not the other states where children are subjected to this kind of horrific abuse. Kudos to the ACLU and the SPLC for their tireless advocacy on behalf of this country’s most vulnerable.
Related Stories:
Why Is Maryland Spending 100 Million To Lock Up Its Youth?
Read more: aclu, for profit prison, juvenile justice, mississippi, solitary confinement, SPLC
Photo from Vectorportal via flickr.
Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may
not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.
Yoo hoo Stephen, Non-muscle power may make manufacturing cheaper ...but it can't purchase the goods…
Great success story:) Thank you!
scary......we can still do our best to minimize destruction.....keep care2ing and we have a chance.......reduce,…
29 comments
+ add your ownThanks for the article.
Finally!
They deserve far worse than solitary.
I guess unless you have been a victim of these young people you will never understand.
It is by all means not a pretty sight, violent is more like it and they don't care absolutely about anything other than showing off to their friends as to how bad they can be and even after that their friends don't wan't anything to do with them.
There not sick, they just don't care about anything.
I hope they get the help they deserve.
I am very happy this law was passed. It's a shame it was needed, but Mississippi passing it? Who would have thought?
These kids have enough problems with their lives....thank goodness they don't have to go into solitary!
Thank you for this
Why is it that so many people cannot see that if it is in an institutions best (financial) interests to incarcerate someone there will be ample evidence to keep them incarcerated? That's why jails/prisons were in government control to begin with - there can ALWAYS be a reason to keep someone in prison. Are human rights not considered at all anymore?
Make that 'kinds', not 'kings'!
patricia l.
6:53am PST on Mar 1, 2012
David A....It sounds to me like the whole damn system is UNSTABLE! Does it rehabilitate? I doubt it.
Actually, no, it doesn't. The staff see inmates as job security and promotional opportunity, especially when considering recidivism, and a majority of inmates are not likely to change. My rule of thumb was that a third will never do it again, a third are incorrigible, and a third are pliable to handling. A couple of the better inmates with whom I discussed this theory though I was too optimistic, but it is at least a starting point. The bottom line is that correction need to be harsh enough to be unpleasant, but FAIR, and it needs to offer constructive guidance rather than warehousing convicts and paying empty lip service to improving them. Did I mention that it needs to be fair and honest? Perhaps the biggest rule violators and the senior management should not be the same people? If I had more than 1500 characters, I could tell all kings of good stories--even tell you about Bumperjack!
login to add your comment
use your care2 login
add your comment
20