START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x
2,586,675 people care about Environment & Wildlife

Mountain Lion Kittens Killed in Hunts

Mountain Lion Kittens Killed in Hunts

In 2010, 40 wild mountain lions were hunted and killed in South Dakota during an annual hunt. According to the South Dakota Mountain Lion Management Plan, five of the forty killed were kittens less than a year old. 

In total, between 2005-2010, 102 adults, juveniles and kittens have been killed in these hunts. (Table 4

The Mountain Lion Foundation has been observing the hunts and has highlighted the deaths of kittens
“Despite the Department’s misinterpretation of the Logan and Sweanor’s research on the subject, the death of 24 female mountain lions would also cause the unnoticed deaths of at least six litters of kittens, for an additional 18 lion mortalities.”

They also point out how the orphaning of multiple kittens as a result of the hunts could actually increase mountain lion attacks on domestic animals later

“Not to mention, this would also orphan 18 “teenage” lions ranging in age from 12 to 24 months — lions, which as they grow up are now most likely to prey on domestic animals because they didn’t have mothers to teach them what to hunt.”

One of the state’s rules for the hunts is that kittens are not allowed to be hunted and killed. Although, adult females who have kittens are allowed to be killed. As a result, some kittens are dying even though there is a prohibition on killing them directly.

Wouldn’t it make more sense not to shoot adult females with litters? Is it impossible to distinguish between an adult female who might have a litter, from one that does not? Better yet, instead of allowing the adult females to be killed for dubious reasons, thus letting their kittens die, why not relocate some of the adults to protected mountain areas in far off states, away from humans?

A total of 326 mortality events were documented in the Black Hills from 1998-2009. (Page 30) Eighty were killed by hunting, 72 were killed by removal, (which means the state killed them) and 52 were killed by vehicle accidents. In other words, over 200 were killed by humans. (Others died from unknown causes, disease, interspecies conflict and poaching.) 
So between removal by the state (72), and vehicle deaths (52) alone, it would seem plenty of mountain lions are dying, even without hunting. The state’s own document explains why so many die because of vehicle collisions: 

“The Black Hills has one of the highest road densities of any National Forest.” (Page 6)

In seeing the large number of reported mountain lion deaths, one might expect the overall population must be large in the Black Hills area. However, the state’s own estimate is about 140 adults and 110 juveniles and kittens (Juveniles and kittens are young enough to be dependent on adults).

That number is disputed as being too high by the Mountain Lion Foundation in a recent article. They say the potentially inflated number is being used to justify the hunts and the call for increasing the number of mountain lion killings in 2011:

“Basic math skills would lead anyone who can subtract to acknowledge that by the start of South Dakota’s 2011 mountain lion hunting season on New Year’s Day there could possibly be only 142 lions still existing in the region (99 adults; 43 kittens).”

So will even more mountain lion adults and some kittens be hunted and killed in 2011? Surely there must be a way for the state to educate hunters about the differences between a kitten, a juvenile and an adult mountain lion? It could not be more clear that kittens and juveniles are no threat to humans, so why kill them? Even the adults aren’t attacking anyone.

Couldn’t they at least impose a fine on anyone who shoots a kitten or a juvenile, which is clearly an act of animal cruelty? It appears the better solution is to cancel this year’s hunt and work on gathering better research and communicating more clearly with the public. Why? Because killing mountain lions already dying in large numbers without the hunts, is barbaric.

Read more: , , , , , , ,

Public Domain: National Park Service

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

352 comments

+ add your own
7:44AM PST on Dec 15, 2012

I completely agree with Gene S.

7:37AM PST on Dec 15, 2012

Laws protect and state authorities encourage these “god-damned killers” and their “annual hunts". I don’t like to use such language - but sometimes there is just no other way to say it. This is no different than the Canadian seal slaughter - or in Japan - “The Cove” - the never ending onslaught of humanity against the animal kingdom - - -

9:01AM PST on Dec 11, 2012

Thank you for sharing.

4:44AM PST on Nov 21, 2012

why??

3:26PM PDT on Sep 4, 2012

Beyond sadness..

3:26PM PDT on Sep 4, 2012

Beyond sadness..

3:25PM PDT on Sep 4, 2012

Beyond sadness..

3:17PM PDT on Jul 7, 2012

I can not believe all the CRAP I read about all these ASS@@@@ killing little kittens
It is just disgusting.

8:31AM PDT on Apr 16, 2012

:( humans disgust me

6:25AM PDT on Mar 29, 2012

noted...very sad..they killed babies :(((

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

ads keep care2 free

meet our writers

Kristina Chew Kristina Chew teaches and writes about ancient Greek and Latin and is Online Advocacy and Marketing... more
Story idea? Want to blog? Contact the editors!
ads keep care2 free

more from causes

Animal Welfare

Causes Canada

Causes UK

Children

Civil Rights

Education

Endangered Wildlife

Environment & Wildlife

Global Development

Global Warming

Health Policy

Human Rights

LGBT rights

Politics

Real Food

Trailblazers For Good

Women's Rights




Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.