START A PETITION37,000,000 members: the world's largest community for good
Care2 Causes | Nestle Can Keep Piping Water Out of Drought-Stricken California Despite Permit Expiring in 1988

Nestle Can Keep Piping Water Out of Drought-Stricken California Despite Permit Expiring in 1988

Written by Lorraine Chow and reposted with permission from EcoWatch

In a major setback for environmental groups, a federal judge in California has tossed out allegations that the U.S. Forest Service allowed Nestlé’s bottled water operation to take water from the San Bernardino National Forest on a permit that expired back in 1988.

Nestle bottled water

A federal court has ruled in favor of the U.S. Forest Service for allowing the Nestlé’ to continue its use of a four-mile pipeline that siphons water from the San Bernardino National Forest. Photo Credit: EcoWatch

The decision regards a lawsuit filed against the Forest Service in October 2015 by the Courage Campaign Institute, the Center for Biological Diversity and the Story of Stuff Project. The groups alleged that the agency was allowing Nestlé Waters North America to pipe water from public lands on a permit that had long expired.

With the ruling, the multinational food and drink corporation can continue its use of a four-mile pipeline that siphons thousands of gallons of public water a day from the Strawberry Creekwatershed and sell it back to the public as bottled water. The water is sold under the Arrowhead brand.

U.S. District Judge Jesus Bernal wrote in a Sept. 20 order that since the Forest Service received a request to renew the permit in May 1987, the effort was considered a “timely and sufficient application for renewal,” thus keeping the original permit valid.

Bernal rejected the plaintiffs’s argument that the Forest Service’s failure to act on the May 1987 request renders the permit invalid.

“Plantiffs do not identify, and the court cannot find, any authority holding that an agency’s failure to act within a reasonable time” invalidates a special use permit, Bernal wrote.

The decision was criticized by the three environmental groups that initiated the lawsuit.

“The court has just confirmed what many Americans fear, massive corporations play by a different set of rules than the rest of us,” Eddie Kurtz, executive director of Courage Campaign Institute, said in reaction to yesterday’s decision. ”Nestlé has been pulling a fast one for nearly 30 years, taking a public resource, depriving plants and animals of life-sustaining water, and selling that water at an obscene profit without the right to do so, but apparently our justice system is OK with that.”

“We’re shocked by the court’s decision to let Nestlé continue its operations, and we will continue to stand with hundreds of thousands of Californians and people across the nation to take back control of this public water,” added Michael O’Heaney, executive director of the Story of Stuff Project. “This fight is far from over.”

Let’s not forget that California is experiencing its fifth year of an epic drought. The Center for Biological Diversity pointed out that in 2015 alone, Nestlé had piped away an estimated 36 million gallons of water from the forest to sell as bottled water. Nestlé pays an annual permitting fee of $524 for permission to run its pipeline.

“Reports from the end of 2015 and the summer of 2016 indicate that water levels at Strawberry Creek are at record lows, threatening local wildlife that are already dealing with the ongoing drought in Southern California,” the Center for Biological Diversity said.

“The court’s decision is disappointing, but the real tragedy lies in the fact that Strawberry Creek is drying up, dooming the plants, fish and animals that have relied on it for tens of thousands of years” said Ileene Anderson, senior scientist with the Center for Biological Diversity. “Bottling water is not worth sacrificing Strawberry Creek, so we’re considering our options for appeal.”

Environmentalists have long decried bottled water as wasteful, expensive, unnecessary and a major source of plastic pollution.

Annie Leonard, the executive director of Greenpeace USA, argued in November: “A four-year review of the bottled water industry in the U.S. and the safety standards that govern it, including independent testing of over 1,000 bottles of water found that there is no assurance that just because water comes out of a bottle it is any cleaner or safer than water from the tap. In fact tap water is tested more frequently than bottled water.”

Nestlé Waters was not a party in the case but told EcoWatch in a prepared statement it was “pleased” with the ruling.

“The Forest Service has acknowledged that our permit is in full force and effect until the renewal process is concluded,” Christopher Rieck, spokesman for Nestlé Waters North America Inc., said. “We look forward to working in close cooperation with them to continue to manage the Arrowhead Springs in Strawberry Canyon sustainably for the long-term.”

The company added that it recognizes “the impact the drought is having across the state, and we have implemented new technologies in our California facilities that will conserve 55 million gallonsof water each year.”

Nestlé carefully monitors all spring sources and manages them to ensure long-term sustainability and healthy habitats, he said.

Photo Credit: Daniel Orth/Flickr

86 comments

John B
John B4 months ago

Thanks for sharing.

SEND
Marie W.
Marie W9 months ago

Boycott the crap.

SEND
Jennifer H.
Jennifer H9 months ago

Damn Nestle.

SEND
Siyus Copetallus
Siyus Copetallus9 months ago

Thank you for sharing.

SEND
Rosslyn O.
Rosslyn O9 months ago

Don't EVER purchase Bottled water ever!!! That is the only way to stop this continuance of pollution, lack of water, polluted water and money grab. As for this company, just don't purchase any of their other products. ( But if and when they collapse, so too will many jobs)

SEND
Ron Loynes
Ron Loynes9 months ago

Good example of bought and paid for government officials.

SEND
Patricia H.
Patricia Harris9 months ago

Jacklyn Walker is spot on!! If you buy and drink bottled water, you're only supporting the bottled water corporations.

SEND
Fran away F.
Fran away F9 months ago

I've been boycotting Nestle since the mid-70's, when their infant formula was exposed as deadly due to the lack of clean water to mix it with in many countries. Here's a list and discussion of Nestle's many crimes against humanity and nature:

https://unlatched.wordpress.com/2013/04/23/why-nestle-is-evil-it-goes-beyond-just-infant-formula/

SEND
Denise D.
Denise D9 months ago

Hmmm, a person can get arrested (slapped into handcuffs and all!) for having a $10 late fee for not renewing their dogs license on time (Kalamazoo, MI) but Nestle can go decades with zero repercussions???!!! WTF is right! I will continue to boycott all Nestle products.

SEND
Jen S.
Jen S9 months ago

This transcends outrageous. Is there no one person with the water authority or the courts with the spine to enforce California law and save the water for Californians? Nestle may be the proverbial 800 pound gorilla but they did not buy the state, and contrary to their behavior, are not exempt from the law. Someone wake up the governor. Or call the EPA.

SEND
ads keep care2 freelearn more ▸

CONNECT WITH US

EMAIL THE EDITORS

ads keep care2 freelearn more ▸

COMMUNITY SUCCESS!

Success! Introducing Jodie Whittaker, Dr. Who #13

Ever since Peter Capaldi announced in January 2016 that he was quitting his job as the 12th Dr....

Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

New to Care2? Start Here.