The promotion of infant formula or other breast milk substitutes is considered dangerous and unethical by the World Health Organization (WHO), the United Nations, and other major public health organizations. According to the WHO’s FAQs on the International Code of Marketing of Breastmilk Substitutes (WHO Code):
The protection, promotion and support of breastfeeding rank among the most effective interventions to improve child survival. It is estimated that high coverage of optimal breastfeeding practices could avert 13% of the 10.6 million deaths of children under five years occurring globally every year. Exclusive breastfeeding in the first six months of life is particularly beneficial, and infants who are not breastfed in the first month of life may be as much as 25 times more likely to die than infants who are exclusively breastfed.
No one disputes the fact that formula and bottles should exist. However, the WHO, breastfeeding and health advocacy organizations, along with many governments, agree that they should not be marketed to expectant mothers, new mothers and health professionals. People should be able to access these products when they are needed, but should not be faced with deceptive messages and imagery that suggest that a bottle is the standard way to feed a baby or that formula is as good as breastmilk.
Nestlé Continues To Ignore WHO Code
Nestlé, the largest manufacturer of infant formula in the world, is also well known by organizations that monitor compliance with the WHO Code as being the most egregious violator of the rules.
On its website, Nestlé claims that it was “the first company to implement the Code across its entire operations in developing countries, through the Nestlé Instructions on the implementation of the WHO International Code of Marketing of Breast-milk Substitutes.” However, despite this, numerous violations of the WHO Code are found every year in both developing and developed countries.
The International Baby Food Action Network (IBFAN) works with agencies in each country around the world to monitor the promotion of infant formula and breastmilk substitutes. In its 2010 report “Breaking the Rules, Stretching the Rules 2010″, IBFAN cites 134 breaches of the WHO Code by Nestlé. However, according to Reuters, a Nestlé spokesperson feels that only four of the allegations were worth investigating. In other words, Nestlé is opting to ignore 97% of the documented violations of the WHO Code.
New Formula Marketing Gimmicks
On top of its refusal to address 97% of the WHO Code violations, Nestlé is also continuing to invent new formula marketing gimmicks. This week it announced the launch of the BabyNes machine, which looks like and works in a similar fashion to coffee machines like the Keurig or Tassimo.
The launch of this machine raises numerous concerns:
So while Nestlé rakes in the profits and Swiss parents can make bottle feeding fashionable, these new fancy feeding machines are likely to soon be marketed around the world in contests and promotions all aimed at getting moms to switch to formula.
The lack of consequences for formula marketing, even in places where legal restrictions do exist, continues to threaten breastfeeding rates around the world, resulting in excessive costs to parents and unnecessary burdens on the health care system. Studies have shown that formula marketing does negatively impact breastfeeding rates, which can have dire health consequences. This is the reason that the WHO is so adamant that infant formula should be available, but not promoted or pushed on new parents.
Image credit: bradeyolin on flickr
Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may
not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.