START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x

New EPA Fuel Standards: Why MPG No Longer Matters

New EPA Fuel Standards: Why MPG No Longer Matters

I love the ambitious new automobile efficiency targets set by the EPA this week. This is long overdue. As the EPA pointed out, “transportation sources accounted for 28 percent of all U.S. greenhouse gas emissions in 2007, and have been the fastest-growing source of U.S. GHG emissions since 1990.” 

While the new targets works out to an average of 35.5 MPG by 2016, the rules are actually set in terms of “grams of CO2 per mile.” I suspect that it was done this way because of the EPA’s new found authority to regulate CO2, but it also highlights that “miles per gallon” is not all that matters when it comes to climate change. 

From an oil perspective, setting these aggressive targets may be the single most important action taken to preserve the United States since Robert E. Lee’s surrender at Appomattox. Rather than balanced trade, our dependence on foreign oil has created a systematic drain of dollars from the US to the tune of $200 billion per year, with many negative implications to the stability and economic well being of the country. Additionally, our massive military expenditures are driven by the need to protect our overseas oil supplies (see the Carter Doctrine.) And with the looming specter of  peak oil – or even just $150/barrel oil – closing the spigot is needed.

But in dealing with climate change, there’s a lot more to think about than just how much gasoline gets burned.

The good:  Reducing gasoline related emissions.
Assuming a 100,000 mile life, a car getting 25 MPG will burn 4,000 gallons over its lifetime, resulting in 40 tons of CO2  emissions. By raising fuel efficiency to 35 MPG, that car will use 1,100 less gallons of gasoline, keeping 11 tons of CO2 emissions out of the atmosphere.

It also reduces the amount spent on gasoline by almost $4,000!  While automobile manufacturers are estimating that the cost to meet the new higher targets will be around $1000 per car, that still puts consumers way ahead of the game. As an old 1987 Honda CRX owner (and how I miss my old pocket rocket), I can say that this does not need to be the case. My CRX was high mileage (40-60 MPG), high performance, and very reasonably priced…and this was 25 years ago. The secret was a small but efficient engine, and a very lightweight design…which brings us to: 

The bad:  Considering the lifecycle and impact of the automobile.  
An awful lot of rubber, steel, plastic and other materials go into making a car. The energy used to power the gigantic factories stamping out parts and assembling it is also significant. The most recent estimate I’ve seen is that producing a mid-sized sedan results in roughly 7 tons of emissions. I’m guessing that a full-sized SUV with 19 inch wheels and TVs in the seats checks in a lot higher than that.

Unfortunately, automobiles seem to be designed for obsolescence rather than reuse. While many materials are recycled, a more modular cradle to cradle approach to automotive design would be much more eco-friendly.

The support system for automobiles, and consequences of our autocentric culture also have led to the large US emissions footprint. Road building and maintenance, replacing natural habitat with asphalt and sprawl, lack of convenient public transportation…all of these help create an automobile emissions intensive culture. As cars become cheaper to operate, will we simply demand our own version of the autobahn, and drive further and more often?

Avoiding the ugly:  Swapping coal for oil?
The biggest battle in the EPA’ s new  rule was over how to treat electric cars. While the industry likes to use the term ‘zero emissions vehicle’, a plug-in car  requires electricity from the grid. Several estimates I’ve seen put the amount of energy used in the range of 3 miles per kWH. If you’re connected to the hydroelectric-powered clean grid up in Washington, your plug-in would be six times less carbon intensive than a gas powered vehicle. But if you operate that same car in coal-dependent North Dakota, then your  ‘zero emissions vehicle’ would actually be 20% more emissions intensive than if it used gasoline. Of course you can offset this electricity use by supporting wind farms in North Dakota, but the vehicle itself far is from ‘zero emissions’.

It’s possible that a hybrid Prius, which generates electricity from its braking system, may actually be better from an emissions perspective than a plug-in. In any case, the EPA gave each automobile manufacturer 300,000 ‘zero emissions’ car waivers through 2016, which means the 35.5 MPG figure is actually closer to 34.5 MPG. Beyond that, who knows.

But three cheers for the EPA, for thinking about oil and emissions. Whether we replace gasoline with  electricity created from coal, bio-diesel from corn, or hydrogen produced in a refinery, they need to keep the focus on grams of  CO2 per mile, not MPG.

It would also be great to start thinking of the the footprint of the actual vehicle and other consumables (tires, oil, other consumables) that go with it. I think we’d be better off with hybrid CRXs rather than than plug in Escalades….Or maybe more light rail, and less of both. 

Read more: , , ,

Photo copyright:  http://www.flickr.com/photos/pagedooley/ / CC BY 2.0

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

55 comments

+ add your own
11:11PM PDT on Oct 26, 2013

Thank you.

11:10PM PDT on Oct 26, 2013

Thank you.

11:09PM PDT on Oct 26, 2013

Thank you.

11:06PM PDT on Oct 26, 2013

Thank you.

9:05PM PDT on Jul 2, 2010

40 years ago I bought my first car, a Toyota Tercel. It got 40-45 MPG. I've always wondered why, with the advances in technology, that the mileage for succeeding generations of Toryots went down or stayed the same....

3:23AM PDT on Jun 28, 2010

Thanks

9:46AM PDT on Apr 30, 2010

The flixxy website has a car that supposedly runs on compressed air. It's an old news story or science show piece, but it sounds good to me. They claim it gets a 200 mile range and runs silently. Check out that website and do a search on ZERO POLLUTION AUTOMOBILE . Someone needs to find this guy and start producing his cars.

9:43AM PDT on Apr 30, 2010

My vehicle gets 35-40 mpg, it's a Toyota Echo, Toyota replaced them a few years ago with the less efficient Yaris. I think Toyota should bring back the Echo, I think a lot of people would want it for the mileage it gets. They're also a very long lasting car with few repairs required, which is why most people who have one keep them instead of selling them to get new cars.

1:01PM PDT on Apr 12, 2010

just getting 20 credits

2:54PM PDT on Apr 11, 2010

cable cars- with solar panelled roofs and the ground space between the tracks is solar panels.

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

“bored at 1 a.m. and decided to wake up my (Twitter timeline).” Dear god in heaven, what…

Things seem to be getting more and more absurd. I am getting sick and tired of all the disgusting intrusions…

Tim, BO knows he has no line item veto power, but will sign bill after bill, then afterwards, change…

meet our writers

Steve Williams Steve Williams is a passionate supporter of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Trans (LGBT) rights, human... more
Story idea? Want to blog? Contact the editors!
ads keep care2 free



Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.