START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x
1,286,533 people care about Politics

New York City’s ‘Stop and Frisk’ Unconstitutional, Says Federal Judge

New York City’s ‘Stop and Frisk’ Unconstitutional, Says Federal Judge

U.S. District Court Judge Shira Scheindlin ruled Monday that New York City’s “Stop and Frisk” policy violates the Constitution and must be reformed. The federal judge found that the New York Police Department had adopted a policy of “indirect racial profiling,” which violated protections afforded by the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments.

“The City [of New York] acted with deliberate indifference toward the NYPD’s practice of making unconstitutional stops and conducting unconstitutional frisks,” Scheindlin wrote in her decision. She added that the policy had resulted in “the disproportionate and discriminatory stopping of blacks and Hispanics in violation of the Equal Protection Clause.”

“The city’s highest officials have turned a blind eye to the evidence that officers are conducting stops in a racially discriminatory manner,” Scheindlin wrote. “In their zeal to defend a policy that they believe to be effective, they have willfully ignored overwhelming proof that the policy of targeting ‘the right people’ is racially discriminatory.”

Though Scheindlin stopped short of banning Stop and Frisk, she ordered an independent monitor to oversee the practice and a process to consider additional reforms.

Members of minority groups have been arguing for reform or elimination of Stop and Frisk for years, citing the overwhelming racial disparity in police stops. Those claims were pooh-poohed by New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, who said in June that he thought Stop and Frisk didn’t target enough minorities. Predictably, Bloomberg blasted Monday’s decision, saying that the ruling would make the city and country more dangerous.

Civil rights activists, on the other hand, cheered the ruling. Benjamin Jealous, the head of the NAACP, said in a statement that the ruling was a “groundbreaking victory.” The Center for Constitutional Rights, which represented the plaintiffs in the case, said the ruling was “a victory for all New Yorkers.”

About 5 million people have been stopped under Stop and Frisk over the last decade. The stops have been so heavily weighted toward nonwhites that more African Americans have been stopped than actually live in New York City. Scheindlin noted in her ruling that African Americans were more likely to be stopped for reasons such as “furtive movements” than white people, and that in the vast majority of cases where police cited a “suspicious bulge” as a reason to search, no weapon was found.

Overall, 80 percent of people stopped under Stop and Frisk have been African American or Hispanic, and 90 percent of those stopped weren’t convicted of any crime. The stops appear to have been designed to harass and frighten non-white New Yorkers, rather than to reduce crime rates.

The ruling could complicate the potential candidacy of New York City Police Commissioner Ray Kelly, who has been touted as a possible replacement for Janet Napolitano as Secretary of Homeland Security. The ruling will also impact the ongoing race to succeed Bloomberg as New York City mayor. Most mayoral candidates indicated a tentative acceptance of the ruling, with all Democratic candidates issuing statements ranging from calls for improvement to outright elimination of the program.

The current mayor, however, shows no sign of giving up. Bloomberg vowed to appeal the ruling, stating that New York City did not receive a fair trial. That reasoning must ring hollow to the millions of average African American or Hispanic citizens of New York City who have been stopped under the Stop and Frisk policy for no good reason.

Read more: , , , , , ,

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

125 comments

+ add your own
7:28PM PDT on Aug 30, 2013

Shocking!

3:53AM PDT on Aug 15, 2013

this is racial profiling conducted by our "mayor" and his little pal "Kelly" who stands to be head of homeland security - that's all we need -- a professed anti-constitution dictator - to stop and frisk every American - this guy's a control freak - who deserves to be out of a job - and out of our city. Those of you who for a moment think that this has stopped crime, seized illegal guns - controlled drugs - you are seriously deluded! There have been several lives ruined for a "clip" here and there - there have been relatively rare confiscations of weapons - and aside from embarrassing some of my friends multiple times - very few legitimate arrests except an occasional bit of weed - to destroy the records of school youths - if they stopped thee Wall Street crowd - they'd find a lot more cocaine! This has done nothing to lessen crime in the city, and more to bring about a deep hatred and disgust for the men of blue!

12:36AM PDT on Aug 15, 2013

I'm a white man & I don't think it's right for me to be "stopped & frisked" w/out serious reasonable suspicion. Therefore, I don't see how it's right to stop & frisk ANYONE of ANY color w/out same suspicion either. I usually see the race card played as a last defense when nothing else works, but this is one of the many cases where it's true- this is a racist law. We need to stop it now, for everyone!

11:18PM PDT on Aug 14, 2013

bust their a$$, steal their weed, make them cry, make them bleed....''Officer Stadanko.....Nice Dreams''.......to bust a stoner you yourself must become a stoner!....if I were a cop I could have access to the best, top shelf drugs.....just an observation.......and don't forget about the cash.....just as long as they treat the CEOs the same as they do the alley creepers....fishing expedition....won't be going to NYC anytime soon....

10:13PM PDT on Aug 14, 2013

I really think police do go to far in doing their job. It's time for a change. It is just not right to pick some one out of a crowd to frisk them in public. If mostly they find nothing, why keep on doing it? It really couldn't be that much fun.

2:30AM PDT on Aug 14, 2013

I just read a Washington Post article that said "A white person is five times as likely to commit suicide with a gun as to be shot with a gun; for each African American who uses a gun to commit suicide, five are killed by other people with guns." It also pointed out that whites mostly kill themselves in rural areas and blcks in urban areas. Banning the stop and frisk will just increase the numbers that die.

11:40PM PDT on Aug 13, 2013

Thank you

11:25PM PDT on Aug 13, 2013

Just "scattering shooting" here. Bloomberg said that NYC "did not receive a fair trail". It was probably much fairer; justice wise, than those who were stopped and frisked received. Beware NYC & NYS, for a wise man said that those who would give up freedom for security, deserve neither. Don and I CAN! :-))

11:05PM PDT on Aug 13, 2013

"Steven Levitt: The freakonomics of crack dealing" link should have been ...
... http://www.ted.com/talks/steven_levitt_analyzes_crack_economics.html

Sorry about that.

10:50PM PDT on Aug 13, 2013

What would happen if we saw stop and frisk the laptops of business executives … bankers for example?

Harry S. you ask some interesting questions … and there are obvious answers … “Why is the Race Card always raised? Because it is always an issue.

“What percentage of the community make silent cash fortunes in the drug trade?” Here’s a lovely link to a very entertaining lecture that you can read as a reply to the question … "Steven Levitt: The freakonomics of crack dealing" http://www.ted.com/search?cat=ss_all&q=crack

“Next time any of you are getting beaten to pulp by these bandits for any reason. Pleas DO NOT call a cop!” Are you saying here that the beating would be from a policeman and so there isn’t any point in asking another for help? I think you are being too hard on many good and upright members of the force.


add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

Care2 - Be Extraordinary - Start a Care2 Petition
ads keep care2 free
CONTACT THE EDITORS

Recent Comments from Causes

David F*ckwit writes "The liberal Democrat war on women forces them to abandon the right to defend themselves…

I'm not even gonna get going on my rant on this one as i'm tired+jus so sick of these deplorable traditions+status…

This is specifically to address what Christopher W. stated about farmers and growing food... GMOs are…

ads keep care2 free



Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.