Newsweek Will No Longer Be a Print Magazine

Next year there will be one less publication on the racks by the checkout lanes at the grocery store. Today, the magazine announced that it will cease to publish a print edition on December 31.

For the past decade, Newsweek’s circulation has steadily slipped: In 2001, its total paid circulation was 3,158,480 but this has now shrunk by more than half, to 1,527,157 as of June this year.

My household is one of those 1,631,323 who decided, years ago, not to renew our subscription. Why, when there is now enough information on the Internet to have satiated the news cravings of even my late mother-in-law, Grace?

Grace subscribed to four newspapers and, until illness and age took their sad toll, read every page every day. She steadfastly paid for a subscription to Time magazine for us; my husband and I added one for Newsweek (“that’s the liberal one,” Grace scoffed) so we could each claim a news magazine. For us, the Internet has changed these behaviors. While I still read the news standing in the checkout line, it’s via my phone.

Tina Brown: No More Print Newsweek Is Just a Transition

Tina Brown, founder of the Daily Beast website who was highly instrumental in merging it with Newsweek, puts what could be called a brave face on the final act of the eight-decade-old publication’s print edition. In A Turn of the Page for Newsweek (an ironically titled article), Brown seeks to convey the end of the magazine in print form as a transition and a stepping stone to an all-digital format. This new version, Newsweek Global, will be available via paid subscription with some context accessible on The Daily Beast site.

Citing a recent Pew Research Center study which found that 39 percent of Americans get their news from the Internet, Brown insists that the change is by no means the end of Newsweek as we have known it:

It is important that we underscore what this digital transition means and, as importantly, what it does not. We are transitioning Newsweek, not saying goodbye to it. We remain committed to Newsweek and to the journalism that it represents. This decision is not about the quality of the brand or the journalism—that is as powerful as ever. It is about the challenging economics of print publishing and distribution.

But as the New York Times’ Media Decoder blog points out, “readers and media analysts have been puzzled by some of the covers” and some of the coverage that Brown, eager “to distinguish Newsweek from other magazines and make it a talked-about publication again,” has chosen. There was last November’s cover story about sex addiction; May’s depicting President Obama with a rainbow-hued halo and the headline ”The First Gay President”; the recent MuslimRage story that generated attention for reasons other than what Brown may have bargained for.

The New York Times also details Newsweek’s recent past financial woes. Bought for $1 from the Washington Post in 2010 by a nonagenarian audio magnate, Sidney Harman, Newsweek’s “future grew grimmer still after Mr. Harman died in the spring of 2011.” After initially saying they would still back “the ailing weekly,” Hammer’s heirs announced last summer that their investment would cease. The Daily Beast is itself owned by IAC/InterActiveCorp whose chairman, Barry Diller, has “made it clear he would not underwrite the losses forever.”

This report of Newsweek’s actual demise, or of the print version at any rate, has not been unanticipated. The Guardian’ writes that, four years ago, he had opined that Newsweek would not last more than five years.

By the time she passed away in 2010, my mother-in-law Grace had lost most of her eyesight and paid no heed to the news on the TV set in her nursing home room. But there was a time in the 1960s when she hid copies of Time magazine (like the one whose black-and-red cover asked “Is God Dead?”) from her eager-reader son (my husband) and when she’d go straight for the copies of Newsweek on our kitchen table when she visited and remind us that she was planning to renew our subscription to Time.

Those days of Grace turning the pages of magazines are long gone. Will print publications all fade away too someday?


Related Care2 Coverage

15 Rages Against #MuslimRage

“Good Girls” Take a Stand – and Change the News Biz

Journalism Losing Its Footing in Canada




Kathy Perez
Kathy Johnson4 years ago

bittersweet really

Alex H.
Alex H4 years ago

I have only one word of warning about this disturbing trend to force people to access news and current affairs 'on line'.Many years ago,my highly qualified eye specialist said to me that the human eye is not constructed to be able to stare at a close screen for lengthy periods of time! Why do the poor workers who have to do this,suffer so much from headaches,eye strain,neck strain,back ache etc etc??!! Computers were supposed to make our life better! How we have been conned!!Now we are going to be denied paper reading material,so much nicer than staring at a screen and being zapped by EMF and EMR!!!Maybe,the human race will go blind too!?

Marilyn L.
Marilyn L4 years ago

Not sorry to see it go, I have thought for a long-time that Newsweek lost it ground as a progressive mag. I must say though when their is no longer newsprint of any kind I will miss it.

Ron B.
Ron B4 years ago

No big loss here. As far as I'm concerned, Newsweek can disappear altogether because it has been drifting ever further to the right, not to the left. All of the squawking that you hear from right-wingers about "liberal" Newsweek is a crock of bull. According to lying Republican operatives and the screwed up thinking of their naive followers, any main-stream media that isn't fanatically off the rails and far, far to the right is a Commie Pinko liberal news source. Even a right-wing publication such as Newsweek falls into this category according to them because it isn't far right enough.

These dangerous fools of the Republican base are being led to believe that the most "fair and balanced" source of information out there is Fox "News". As anyone with half a brain in their head on up knows, or should know, Fox "News" was established right from the start to be nothing more or less than deliberate lying right-wing propaganda. But don't waste your time trying to convince idiots who think that Newsweek is liberal of this fact.

Beth M.
Beth M4 years ago

Saves trees.

Melania Padilla
Melania Padilla4 years ago

Less paper in the world!

Paul B.
Paul B4 years ago

Adios! Sayounara! Caio! Bye-bye! Another liberal rag that won't be missed. When they realize no one will buy their online subscription either, then it will be time to fold the tent for good. There is too much FREE media already available online, especially of the liberal variety. It basically is all dissiminated by Media Matters & Center for American Progress. It is amazing if you listen or read comments how eeriliy they are all almost exactly the same wording.. .from the MSM to Huff Post and every commentator and blogger in between. Hmmm???

Many print companies are finding it very difficult to monetize online efforts... even well established papers like NYT and WSJ. Like I said, people don't want to pay for what they think they can get for free.

Storek Sc
Storek Sc4 years ago

I for one, am glad they are going out of print and it will soon go out of business.

Newsweek is a liberal rag and has been for some time. What bothers me is how slanted the regular news coverage was. So liberal. And then there is Tina Brown who bragged how she slept with Bill Clinton many times. So please. Good Riddance!


Viir E.
Viir E4 years ago

I get NONE of my news from printed material, but get everything from the Internet, exclusively—such as this site, Facebook, and the Net in general—I don’t know anyone who gets their news from print material, either, anymore—and that is a trend that is not only gaining traction, but is inevitable. Tech is green, especially as we move more and more in to solar, wind and ocean current harvesting technologies, thanks to the POTUS. There are already solar-panels available for mobile device, and they will only continue to increase in availability & effectiveness. The FACT of the matter is that everything is, and HAS BEEN, moving in that direction for at least 10 years. Everything will eventually be only available electronically. As it should be. I will, however, hold onto my real world books, as there is nothing quite like reading a real world novel—the look, the feel, the aroma of real books and real pages are a delight—but something as “ephemeral” and ever-changing (and “throw-away”) as DAILY NEWS—only electronic media is needed for that.

Lisa L.
Lisa L4 years ago

"So for those that complain they don't like techy stuff.. Why don't you stop complaining and try it."

That's a joke, right? If we're reading this at all, we have obviously "tried" "techy stuff." I'm delighted that "techy stuff" helps the sight-impaired. I might end up like myself at some point. But until then, must I really outfit myself with every latest piece of plastic? Americans are enormous suckers for advertising and for wasting their money on toys. For all the hype about saving trees--even now that so much is done with recycled paper--"tech" products are NOT green.