START A PETITION 27,000,000 members: the world's largest community for good
1,253,783 people care about Women's Rights

Nobel Laureate Says Women Can’t Write As Well As He Can

Nobel Laureate Says Women Can’t Write As Well As He Can

Remember the controversy last summer over whether white male writers like Jonathan Franzen were being favored by book reviewers?  Jodi Picoult and Jennifer Weiner said, in an interview, that it is “irrefutable that when it comes to picking favorites…the [New York Times] tends to pick white guys.”  The ensuing debate, conducted mostly online, over whether women’s writing (often dubbed “chick lit”) is taken less seriously died down last fall, but it may just have been reignited by V.S. Naipaul, the winner of the Nobel Prize for Literature and one of the most acclaimed writers in the English language.

When asked by an interviewer for the National Geographic Society whether any woman could be his literary match, he replied, “I don’t think so.”  He added, when queried about Jane Austen (certainly one of the most celebrated writers in the English language), that he “couldn’t possibly share her sentimental ambitions, her sentimental sense of the world.”  In what must have been an attempt to be as offensive as possible, he continued, saying that men’s and women’s writing is “quite different … I read a piece of writing and within a paragraph or two I know whether it is by a woman or not. I think [it is] unequal to me.”

As the news broke, others rightly pointed to the fact that this may speak as much about Naipaul’s egotism as his sexism.  He recently made peace with venerable travel writer Paul Theroux, who wrote about his friendship with Naipaul in a scathing memoir, recounting Naipaul’s more unflattering traits.  He even said that he was forced to be too nice in the memoir, writing in a piece published a few years ago,

“I wanted to write about his cruelty to his wife, his crazed domination of his mistress that lasted almost 25 years, his screaming fits, his depressions, his absurd contention that he was the greatest writer in the English language.”

So is it simply that Naipaul can’t imagine that any writer could be his equal, not just women?  In the Telegraph, literary journalist Alex Clark is quoted as saying, “It’s absurd. I suspect VS Naipaul thinks that there isn’t anyone who is his equal. Is he really saying that writers such as Hilary Mantel, A S Byatt, Iris Murdoch are sentimental or write feminine tosh?”

But what disturbs me — and suggests that this is more about gender than the responses are willing to admit — is Naipaul’s claim that Jane Austen is more “sentimental” than he.  After all, one of the central parts of the debate over Jonathan Franzen’s fame hinged on the notion that women’s writing about issues like family, romance and relationships are taken less seriously than similar books written by men.

So even though Naipaul may be an outrageous narcissist, let’s not dismiss these disheartening new comments as simple evidence of his self-obsession.  And perhaps his words will remind us that literary sexism isn’t just limited to the New York Times.


Read more: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Photo from Flickr.

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it


+ add your own
1:45PM PDT on Jul 30, 2011

Well, I won't be reading ny of HIS work, that's for sure. I usually try to read at least one book by a Nobel Prize awardee, but this guy...No way am I going to help fill his pockets with my hard earned money! Thanks for the info, it was most helpful!

3:46PM PDT on Jul 9, 2011


Saying you know nothing of this man is enough.
Your opinion of a female writer's skill is a useless statement. It supports nothing & it negates nothing.

This author's opinion of himself is arrogant. He probably never reads other's writings!

7:53PM PDT on Jul 6, 2011

oHH! hohoho. A dead starfish can write better than me. I guess I should be a proper talented smart lady and master it, huh?

12:54PM PDT on Jun 23, 2011

I don't know anything about this guy, so I can't comment on his work.

I do know, that nothing by Pearl Buck is worth reading. That does not mean that other women don't have the ability to write, just that Pearl Buck is useless.

1:52AM PDT on Jun 22, 2011

Tired of Warmongering , coldhearted mechanical, phallus on the brain- emotionless , opinions of people who really do not make the slightest blip on my life radar!

1:25PM PDT on Jun 17, 2011

Never heard about him. That must say something.

12:23PM PDT on Jun 9, 2011


7:28PM PDT on Jun 6, 2011

It's a matter of taste, so no way it can be weighed!

12:11PM PDT on Jun 6, 2011

I read a lot and never heard of him - a writers worst nightmare especially one like this. I have never even heard of the piece he won the prize for. How sad is that for him and the organization who awarded the prize?

8:34AM PDT on Jun 6, 2011

What a moron!

add your comment

Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

Care2 - Be Extraordinary - Start a Care2 Petition
ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

What would be really useful is to modify or breed a strain of rice which uses less water. Rice is one…

A most interesting article. thank you for sharing!

ads keep care2 free

Select names from your address book   |   Help

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.