START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x
1,392,795 people care about Politics

Obama Administration Expands Quarantine Powers

Obama Administration Expands Quarantine Powers

Quarantine: It’s one of the most delicate civil rights issues in history, because when does the common good trump individual freedoms? As fears about a possible pandemic spread thanks to air travel and the ready spread of viruses worldwide, the Obama Administration moved to widen quarantine powers via executive order, right in the middle of an Ebola outbreak in Africa. (The outbreak is not a pandemic, or an epidemic, for that matter, but more about that in a minute.) The timing certainly sent a clear message, but it may also have contributed to scaremongering about the risks of ebola.

The story starts in 2003, when President Bush signed Executive Order 13295: Revised List of Quarantinable Communicative Diseases. He was acting in response to Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) and wanted to create a framework for quarantining patients with the disease. He also named ebola among the subset of viral hemorrhagic fevers that merited quarantine. The Obama Administration has broadened the scope on SARS to include all “severe acute respiratory syndromes,” not just SARS.

The original text read:

(b) Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS), which is a disease associated with fever and signs and symptoms of pneumonia or other respiratory illness, is transmitted from person to person predominantly by the aerosolized or droplet route, and, if spread in the population, would have severe public health consequences.

Now, it says that:

(b)  Severe acute respiratory syndromes, which are diseases that are associated with fever and signs and symptoms of pneumonia or other respiratory illness, are capable of being transmitted from person to person, and that either are causing, or have the potential to cause, a pandemic, or, upon infection, are highly likely to cause mortality or serious morbidity if not properly controlled. This subsection does not apply to influenza.

This change in policy does not indicate that people will be forced into mandatory detention for being sick, or that they’ll be quarantined at random, as some scaremongers have claimed. In fact, their erroneous statements can lead people to conceal the signs of serious illness to avoid identification and quarantine, which poses a huge public health risk. In fact, federal law permits for quarantine when people are entering the country or crossing state boundaries, and otherwise leaves the matter up to the states. The update simply reflects the need for increased accuracy and a broader scope (covering conditions like Middle East Respiratory Syndrome, which wasn’t named in the original document) in the event of a truly dangerous disease.

And despite the timing, it has nothing to do with ebola, which is not passed via a respiratory route. The virus travels only through direct contact with infected body fluids. The administration’s unfortunate decision to make this change in the midst of an outbreak (the current situation is not widespread enough to be considered an epidemic, nor is it of the scope of a pandemic) was perhaps not the best PR move, but the change in language isn’t something people should be afraid of.

Before people are placed in quarantine, the situation is reviewed carefully by public health officials, administrators and medical personnel. The decision is not taken lightly, and everyone operates in awareness of the fact that isolating someone to prevent the spread of disease needs to be accompanied with sensitivity about depriving people of their liberties — and that people deserve the best possible care while in quarantine.

Read more: , ,

Photo credit: Anna Fox.

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

49 comments

+ add your own
9:50PM PDT on Aug 18, 2014

noted

1:46PM PDT on Aug 14, 2014

Yet ANOTHER issue the GOP can blow into a HUGE DRAMA!

11:20AM PDT on Aug 12, 2014

It could be abused, most likely by a Republican President.

2:03AM PDT on Aug 11, 2014

thanks

11:36AM PDT on Aug 10, 2014

I hate quarantine programs, because it is a slippery slope that can be used for many purposes. My great aunt oversaw the Japanese interment camp in the desert of Arizona during the war, and she recounted to me all the horrors and inhumanity to man that went on there.

5:06AM PDT on Aug 10, 2014

Thank you.

4:45AM PDT on Aug 10, 2014

ty

3:50AM PDT on Aug 10, 2014

TY

1:52AM PDT on Aug 10, 2014

Thanks for the article.......different situation in Australia.....have heard of people being quarantined in their homes occasionally especially if they have come into contact with meningococcal disease.....as they wait to get tested and treated......not for pneumonia..though........but we do have a National Health Care system here (at the moment) so a different management style would be in place.....Anne M your Mum would of got a free vaccination and booster shots here once she turned 65

1:05AM PDT on Aug 10, 2014

ty

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

Our senior kittyzen Princess will climb up by me when I'm on the futon relaxing and head-butt my hand…

In other words, you have no answer to my questions, and no basis for your allegations (yet again!)? …

meet our writers

Beth Buczynski Beth is a freelance writer and editor living in the Rocky Mountain West. So far, Beth has lived in... more
Story idea? Want to blog? Contact the editors!
ads keep care2 free

more from causes




Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.