START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x

Obama Immigration Policy ‘Vague,’ ‘Opaque’ and Still Excludes LGBT Couples

Obama Immigration Policy ‘Vague,’ ‘Opaque’ and Still Excludes LGBT Couples

Back in July, the White House announced that it was reviewing deportation policy. The stated aim was to concentrate on criminals and to stop removing those with no convictions, domestic violence victims, young students, military service members, close family of American citizens and the elderly.

A review of all 300,000 new cases in immigration courts to sort out low priority cases from the big backlog has now started. From December, trials will start in Baltimore and Denver reviewing current cases and deciding who should stay or go.

This plan supposedly includes lesbians and gays who are married or in a civil partnership.

But the guidance released last week [PDF] for the policy revision omits bi-national same-sex couples.

The New York Times points this out as well that:

The policy is unclear and potentially unfair in ways that are typical of the immigration system. The process of enforcement lacks transparency. The concrete factors for identifying potential beneficiaries have not been spelled out. Even the beneficiaries will remain in legal limbo, with their cases closed but not dismissed.

There seems to be no appeals process for people who believe they should be allowed to stay if they are picked to be deported. Even for convicted criminals, the standards are opaque. Someone with a minor conviction presenting no risk seems subject to deportation — sometimes even a person against whom charges were dropped.

A November 12 investigation by The Times found that the new policy was being applied very unevenly across the country and has led to vast confusion both in immigrant communities and among agents charged with carrying it out.

Immigration activist Matthew Kolken was particularly cynical about the new policy guidance:

“[It's] nothing more than a public relations move and is being done to placate immigration reform activists that are threatening to stay home next November,” he said.

Steve Ralls, spokesperson for Immigration Equality, told the Washington Blade that the lack of explicit mention of bi-national same-sex couples “isn’t just deeply disappointing; it is also detrimental to LGBT immigrants and their American spouses and partners.”

“By declining to address, in writing, the unique circumstances surrounding those couples, DHS has left too much room for interpretation and left too many couples vulnerable to separation,” Ralls said.

“There is no justifiable reason for exclusionary guidelines, and every reason to be explicit in clarifying that the administration believes LGBT Americans should not be forced apart from their husbands and wives.”

Ralls cited as an example of a problem with vague guidance a Boston-area bi-national couple who were told by an immigration official they couldn’t qualify for relief under the new policy — even though they’re legally married.

An anonymous DHS official told the Blade that same-sex couples aren’t explicitly mentioned in the guidance because the Obama administration wants to cover both married and unmarried LGBT couples.

Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.), a Uniting American Families Act sponsor, said:

While I appreciate prior commitments by DHS that LGBT family ties will be taken into account in immigration enforcement decisions – and that this will be explained to ICE agents – without such a directive in writing, there is a serious risk that such families could be wrongfully divided. With the administration taking an otherwise positive step to make immigration enforcement fairer, it is extremely frustrating that families of LGBT binational couples remain at risk. I will be working to ensure that those families are also protected.

Related Stories:

New Guidelines on Immigration Welcome but too Vague Say LGBT Groups

Dutch Relax Rules For Gay Binational Couples, Gay Refugees

NYC City Council: No More Help for Immigration

Read more: , , , , ,

Picture by xtopher1974

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

28 comments

+ add your own
10:37PM PST on Nov 24, 2011

Thanks for the article.

5:13AM PST on Nov 23, 2011

LGBT couples deserve the same rights as straight couples. Equal rights for all Americans!

12:37AM PST on Nov 23, 2011

thanks for sharing

5:49PM PST on Nov 22, 2011

Thank you.

4:26PM PST on Nov 22, 2011

Do you suppose it's deliberately vague to try and appease everybody? Or is it to allow loopholes so the human rights violations aren't prosecuted.

3:58PM PST on Nov 22, 2011

If one is illegally here, then, one does not belong here in the USA. When one is wrong in a situation, there should be a consequence. When there are consequences, one is very careful to not do the wrong.

When one is wrong, there should be no exceptions to the rules!!!

3:21PM PST on Nov 22, 2011

The policy is vague ..much to vague which is the PROBLEM!~

2:43PM PST on Nov 22, 2011

This ISN'T about the immigration policy, it is about the vagueness of it.

2:10PM PST on Nov 22, 2011

I am so sick of this. We are a country of laws and we have immigration laws, the most liberal anywhere, and they should be obeyed. What's so hard about this? You want to change the liberal immigrations laws we have now, knock yourself out, but until then they should be obeyed by ALL.

10:11AM PST on Nov 22, 2011

If any law or policy is vague, then it needs to be clarified. What is so hard to understand about that? Laws and policies are useless and clog the court system if vague and people have the RIGHT to know if they are breaching any law or policy. Who do you think will pay for the countless challenges in court if the policy is not clear?

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

I don't get why they are being praised for their size and not for the quality of their work.

We've taken in many older animals. Although puppies and kittens are cute there is something extraordinary…

Funny. Good to see they found themselves a toy they like, nothing else to do in that yard. I do hope…

meet our writers

Julie M. Rodriguez Julie M. Rodriguez is an arts, green living, and political writer based in San Mateo, CA. Her work... more
Story idea? Want to blog? Contact the editors!

more from causes

Animal Welfare

Causes Canada

Causes UK

Children

Civil Rights

Education

Endangered Wildlife

Environment & Wildlife

Global Development

Global Warming

Health Policy

Human Rights

LGBT rights

Politics

Real Food

Trailblazers For Good

Women's Rights




Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.