Pat Buchanan Supports Norway Gunman’s Islamophobic Message

 

Nobody is suggesting that the actions of Anders Behring Breivik, the man suspected of bombing several buildings in downtown Oslo and then embarking on a shooting spree at an island youth camp, were acceptable — at least, not yet.  But a disturbing number of people are stepping forward to defend Breivik’s message, and to label him a violent but prophetic herald of the coming struggle between Muslims and Europeans.

Pat Buchanan, in a piece for The American Conservative, is the latest to declare that the real threat to Europe is not “native born and homegrown terrorism.  That threat,” he continues, “comes from a burgeoning Muslim presence in a Europe that has never known mass immigration, its failure to assimilate, its growing alienation, and its sometime sympathy for Islamic militants and terrorists.”

The language of crisis and clash between the European (Christian) West and the “inexorably advancing” Muslim world is disturbing, to say the least.  Like the American Family Association’s Bryan Fischer, who joined the many voices denying the fact that Breivik is a Christian terrorist (because, of course, Christians cannot be terrorists), Buchanan claims that Europe’s secular, civilized Christian culture is under siege.  The invaders are barbaric, misogynistic and incapable of embracing our peaceful values.  But we, as civilized Westerners, know better than to respond with similar violence , which is why Breivik is being denied the label of “Christian” and also why his lawyer is arguing that he is insane.  Fischer even compared Breivik to Charles Manson.

Of course, suggesting that European governments do commit violence against their Muslim minorities when they deny them the right to build mosques or ritually slaughter their meat, to say nothing of the restrictions on face veils which send the clear message that visible displays of Muslim piety will not be tolerated, are not themselves acts of violence.  They are attempts to protect European culture from the encroaching intolerance of Muslim society — because it is the Muslims, not the Europeans, who are intolerant.

Lest you think that these blatant displays of Islamophobia are contained within the radical right, take a look at Bruce Bawer’s op-ed in the Wall Street Journal, where he fans flames of fear about Muslim minorities’ ability to crush liberal European values.  ”Muslim gay-bashing is driving gays out of Amsterdam. Muslim Jew-bashing is driving Jews out of Gothenburg, Sweden,” he writes.  ”There is reason to be deeply concerned about all these things, and to want to see them addressed forcefully by government leaders who care about the preservation of individual liberty and human rights.”

None of these commentators will stand behind Anders Behring Breivik, for obvious reasons.  But they are anxious to separate the cause from the man.  They argue: just because this evil, non-Christian, potentially insane man decided to take his Islamophobia to a violent extreme, they reason, doesn’t mean that Islamophobia isn’t justified.

The one breath of fresh air in today’s commentary is a piece for CNN by Stephen Prothero, who calls for Christians to denounce Breivik’s religiously-fueled terrorism.  ”Christians have a responsibility to speak out forcefully against him,” Prothero wrotes, “and to look hard at the resources in the Christian tradition that can be used to such murderous ends.”

Where are these resources?  We need look no further than the words of people like Pat Buchanan and Bryan Fischer.

Related Stories:

Glenn Beck Compares Victims in Norway Attack to Hitler Youth

Norway Mourns Its Dead; Closed Hearing for Gunman

Norway Killer: Feminism is Destroying the West

Photo from ranveig via Wikimedia Commons.

100 comments

Duane B.
.3 years ago

Thank you for sharing.

Jonathan Y.
Jonathan Y.4 years ago

News flash: The Wall St. Journal is owned by Rupert Murdoch, a major purveyor of propaganda for the radical right.

Op-Eds in the WSJ aren't what they used to be. They have been slanted ever since Newscorps. took them over. For real business news and unbiased political analyses read the Economist or Forbes.

Mabolsa Ritchie
Gerry Moran4 years ago

@ Michael M

"...he did hate multicultural people..."

What the hell are multicultural people?

You've cleary got this whole "I hate facism" thing going. I hate facism too. So, with this in mind, how do you feel about islam? Do you think it's a good thing?

SuSanne P.

Thank you for posting this. It is SHAMFULL.

Michael MacDonald

regardless of his mental state

Michael MacDonald

if you need the reasoning of why it wasn't an act of mental illness
here it is:

Psychotic episodes happen in the spur of the moment.
This attack was far to well planned to be one.

furthermore,
saying that it was only his mental illness would required you to ignore the fact that he was right wing, he did hate multicultural people, he did hate liberal people, etc.
all of this is completely true so there is no questioning the fact that all that hatred in his right wing ideology played a key role in causing him to do this.

Michael MacDonald

I see a lot of people shitting on norway as a country and the mentally ill.

Stop that.

what you should be shitting on
is right wing ideology as a whole.
especially the bigotry, because that kind of hatred is what leads to this kind of thing.

I'm actually mentally ill and how he's trying to cop out and blame it on mental illness is disgusting me.
We already have it hard enough with shows like CSI making us all out to be monsters.
It sure doesn't help when people get to blame killing 76 people on it when it was clearly his hate that led him to do it.

Michael MacDonald

all this proves is that this guy is just as much of a bigot as breivik.

how can anyone even try to justify mass killings.
you have to be one sick bastard to defend that.

Henri D.
Henri DeToi4 years ago

Ron G, I could not disagree much on most of what you said. Good Muslim and good Christians do not kill in the name of God just like good Atheists conduct themselves to make it a better world.

This is why I firmly believe in separation of Church and State and liberty of religion which includes the right not to practice any.

Where we part is that I believe in no religion invented and controlled by men; that is if you believe in any, but you seem to be. Now that I think of it, I do not trust any governement run and controlled by men, the reason why we need safeguards against them.

Catt R.
Catt R.4 years ago

Linda M. I like your idea, but where do we send all the 10th and 15th generation folks that are promoting violence................ and why should immigrants be expected to give up their culture? Outlawing items of clothing that are a part of the culture is unacceptable...... the face covering for some of them, and the covering of their hair is modesty, outlawing the items would be to them the same as if you were told you may not wear clothing to cover your 'private areas' Making it illegal for them to prepare their food in the manner that they have known all their lives will prevent them from going to hell is WRONG !!!! We have NO RIGHT to prevent another human being from practicing their religion , unless they want human sacrifice.

All those who say the Norwegian terrorist could not have been Christian because he killed people.................... God can hear you lie, and he knows more evil has been done 'in his name' than not, it makes him sad and angry I am sure, but your lies do not help. Extremists are dangerous, no matter what name they address god by. and denying that Christian extremists exist helps their cause.