“Total disregard for the safety and welfare of Sandusky’s child victims”: An independent report about the Penn State University sexual abuse scandal accuses top university officials of nothing less. “The most powerful men at Penn State failed to take any steps for 14 years to protect the children who Sandusky victimized,” says Louis J. Freeh, the former federal judge and director of the FBI who oversaw the report.
Superstar football coach Joe Paterno (whose passed away in January), former university president Graham Spanier and a number of other officials are all accused of deliberately covering up facts about Sandusky sexually abusing children in the Penn State football facilities. Last month, Sandusky was convicted of 45 counts of child sexual abuse and is expected to serve a life sentence.
The report clearly states that Penn State officials feared for the reputation of the university and, in particular, of its powerful college football program, to the point of treating the safety of children as of secondary concern:
“In order to avoid the consequences of bad publicity… [top university officials] repeatedly concealed critical facts relating to Sandusky’s child abuse from the authorities, the board of trustees, the Penn State community and the public at large.:
The investigation took seven months during which more than 400 interviews were conducted and more than 3.5 million documents reviewed.
Reports Makes Clear What Paterno and Spanier Knew
The Chronicle of Higher Education has published some parts of the report, with annotations. Page 15 clearly states that Spanier and the university’s board failed in their duties:
“By not promptly and fully advising the Board of Trustees about the 1998 and 2001 child sexual abuse allegations against Sandusky and the subsequent Grand Jury investigation of him, Spanier failed in his duties as President…The Board also failed in its duties to oversee the President and senior University officials in 1998 and 2001 by not inquiring about important University matters and by not creating an environment where senior University officials felt accountable.”
On May 3, 1998, the mother of an 11-year-old boy informed a Penn State psychologist and Penn State police that Sandusky had groped her son in a Penn State athletic facility. Penn State vice president Gary Schultz was informed, the Chronicle reports:
Confidential notes from Mr. Schultz indicate that he was aware of the gravity of the situation. “Behavior – at best inappropriate @ worst sexual improprieties,” one note says. Two days after the incident, additional notes from Mr. Schultz say that a second boy had told police a similar story: “Locker room. Wrestling. Kissed on head. Hugging from behind in shower.” The notes end with questions: “Is this the opening of pandora’s box? Other children?”
Even before 1998, staff members and coaches at Penn State routinely saw Sandusky showering with boys in a Penn State locker building, says page 40. Former coach Richard Anderson told investors that he “didn’t think the practice was improper.”
Photo by kerrycrow
Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may
not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.