START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x
1,319,568 people care about Politics

Quebec’s Subsidized Child Care Pays for Itself

Quebec’s Subsidized Child Care Pays for Itself

Subsidized or free childcare is quickly dismissed by governments in the United States and many other countries.  It’s too expensive, they say. People don’t want their taxes raised. Child-free individuals or stay-at-home parents by choice do not want their tax dollars to be spent on child care for other people’s children. That is just the beginning of the arguments that are made against finding a solution that will allow more mothers to go back to work and help families get out of poverty. However, new economic analysis coming out of Quebec shows that those are moot points — subsidized day care pays for itself and even provides a healthy return on the investment.

Day Care Subsidy Allows More Women to Go Back to Work

The province of Quebec in Canada introduced free public all day kindergarten in 1997, then introduced a subsidized day care program for younger children in 1998. The program initially offered day care spaces for $5 per child per day and the fees were later increased to $7 per day. Currently, Parent Central reports that around half of Quebec children under the age of five are in the subsidized day care system. The subsidy provided by the government amounts to around $10,000 annually per day care space.

The cost for non-subsidized day care spaces runs about 5 to 10 times as much as the subsidized spaces.  Essentially, before the subsidized day care program, it made financial sense for both parents to work only if they both had high salaries. For low income families or families with one high salary and one low salary, there was little benefit in both parents working. After the subsidized system was introduced, it made financial sense to have both parents working in almost all families.

In most families the mother earns less money than the father. As a result, the introduction of the subsidized day care system made it possible for a lot of women, who would otherwise have stayed home with the children, to continue their careers. This resulted in a significant increase in maternal workforce participation. According to Parent Central, by 2008 (1o years after the program was introduced), there were an additional 70,000 women with young children in the workforce, which represents an increase of 3.8 percent.

Day Care Subsidy Also Gives Quebec an Economic Boost

A new study by University of Montreal economics professor Pierre Fortin found that Quebec’s subsidized day care system more than pays for itself due to increased income and consumption tax revenue.

Parent Central reported on the study and noted that for every dollar that the government of Quebec invests in subsidized day care, it wins back $1.05; the federal government also benefits through the receipt of $0.44. Essentially, Quebec taxpayers are getting $1.49 back for every $1.00 spent on subsidized day care. I wish my investment portfolio did that well.

Beyond the tax considerations, Fortin also found that increased maternal workforce participation in Quebec gave the province’s Gross Domestic Product a 1.7 percent boost.

Time for Ontario and the Rest of Canada?

The Government of Canada and the governments of several provinces have been exploring options for universal subsidized day care for quite some time. The Government of Ontario has introduced public junior kindergarten and is currently transitioning to public full day kindergarten for both the junior kindergarten (4 year olds) and senior kindergarten (5 year olds). According to Fortin’s study, if Ontario introduced a subsidized day care system similar to the one in Quebec, the program would result in an additional $1.2 to 1.3 billion being sent to the federal government each year. That could amount to an average $100 tax break per person in Ontario or an increased investment in other services (e.g. education, health care).

Non-Financial Considerations

Beyond the financial concerns, a lot of people worry that subsidized child care will result in increased pressure on families when both parents working. If additional supports are put in place for working parents, does that mean that it becomes less acceptable to be a stay at home parent? Are there then fewer supports available to stay-at-home parents, such as playgroups or other parent and tot activities? Do parents who choose to stay at home then become the exception, rather than the rule (much like homeschooling parents are for school-aged children)? These are all important questions that will need to be examined over time.

Although we live in Quebec, we opted not to use the subsidized child care system. We kept our children at home until they were three years old and then they entered a preschool of our choice that was not part of the subsidized system. My partner took our children to playgroups when they were little and he did meet other stay at home parents. However, I have noticed a shift in attitudes in Quebec, where it is almost expected that mothers will take their year of maternity/parental leave and then go back to work when their baby is one year old. That appears to be the societal norm and I think a lot of families end up doing that by default, rather than because they have deemed that to be the best choice for their family.

Needed Incentive?

Will these positive economic findings provide other governments the incentive they need to consider implementing a subsidized day care program?

Related Stories:

Children in Day Care Are Healthier in School

Lack of Child Care Hurting Canada Economically

Quebec: No Religion in Subsidized Day Cares

Photo credit: woodleywonderworks on flickr

Read more: , , , , ,

quick poll

vote now!

Loading poll...

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

71 comments

+ add your own
8:10AM PDT on Aug 31, 2011

This makes perfect sense. The US should do something like this if they can find jobs for the parents.

9:08PM PDT on Aug 17, 2011

My initial reaction is that the U.S. will veto this idea because we're so exceptional that no one else can tell us what to do (and the tea party would throw up their hands at the government intruding into the life of a family). It is a complicated matter. I like the idea IF the parent wants to do it. But no coercion should be placed on a parent to work outside the home if she/he doesn't want to, and would rather care for her/his child at home.

6:05PM PDT on Jun 30, 2011

Me too, Arielle B.!!!

9:08PM PDT on Jun 29, 2011

Sometimes I really do wish I lived in Canada....

7:24AM PDT on Jun 29, 2011

Myriam:

Maybe that depends on whether it is a rural area versus an urban area. I can see services being kept up in Montreal, for example, where there will still be enough parents staying home to make it worthwhile. But in smaller centres, that may not be the case.

4:21PM PDT on Jun 27, 2011

My 3 children went to subsidized daycare, and they got a lot of good experiences out of it: new vocabulary, meals taken in small groups, outdoor activities, friendships that lasted through school, sing-alongs, etc, etc, etc. The daycare workers always acted in respect, and in a caring manner, in an environment that I could trust. It gave me confidence in my job, to know that my children were enjoying themselves during the day, and learning new things in a safe environment.
Annie, I understand your concerns about the services not being kept for the stay-at-home parents, but I don't see that happening, at least not around where I live. There are numerous subsidized daycare around, but also lots of tot activities (swimming, dancing, storytime in pajamas. music shows), during the week and on the week-end, most of them free, or for minumal fee. Kids still get to mingle with neighboors, whether they go to daycare or not.

3:39PM PDT on Jun 26, 2011

i caring, stimulating early childhood environment will produce productive happy future citizens who probably won't be a burden to society, but who will benefit society. the important thing is not whether it is done at home or in a center. it is important that the childcare be good and it provides parents who need to work, a choice, not a dumping ground. the cost of childcare can be subsidized and reasonable as a few companies who provide low cost childcare have discovered and there is better work attendance and employees work better. childcare workers will never get big salaries, but there are many who love their work and wouldn't trade their jobs for anything. just be sure you choose a center carefully and keep in touch with the person providing care. the parent should be the most important to a child, but sometimes it takes a village.

3:02PM PDT on Jun 26, 2011

At least Quebec is doing something for its own!

10:07AM PDT on Jun 26, 2011

Hope they do get it.

8:33PM PDT on Jun 25, 2011

I doubt that anything would convince the right-wingers that anything , even vaguely socialistic is of any benefit. It interferes with their fascism.

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

ads keep care2 free
Story idea? Want to blog? Contact the editors!
ads keep care2 free



Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.