START A PETITION 27,000,000 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x
3,178,784 people care about Animal Welfare

Queenie’s Placement at San Antonio Zoo Enrages Groups That Worked to Free Her

Queenie’s Placement at San Antonio Zoo Enrages Groups That Worked to Free Her

It has taken animal activists more than two years to rescue a circus elephant named Queenie from her owner who was charged with abuse and violations of the Animal Welfare Act.  This week the 52 year-old elephant was finally freed, but her new home is setting off another controversy.

 

Last summer, two of the three elephants owned by Wilbur Davenport were confiscated by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) because of multiple federal violations.  Davenport operated a company called Maximus “Tons of Fun” circus.   The elephants’ named Tina and Jewel were placed in the San Diego Zoo and have been thriving ever since.  Queenie was left behind tied to a tree on her owner’s property.

 

Two organizations, In Defense of Animals (IDA) and Performing Animal Welfare Society (PAWS) continued to press for Queenie’s release and finally in February the USDA filed charges against Davenport.  On Friday, USDA officials and Davenport came to an agreement to send Queenie to the San Antonio Zoo in Texas.

 

This decision has enraged both animal welfare groups.  They say the zoo’s elephant habitat is outdated, unnatural and too small for even the one elephant that currently lives there.  The zoo has been looking to add a second elephant since one died in 2007.  

 

Ideally PAWS and IDA would like to see Queenie and the elephant at the San Antonio zoo moved to one of the sanctuaries run by PAWS.  The group had been working with Davenport to place Queenie on their 2,300-acre refuge called ARK.

 

Pat Derby, who founded PAWS, said she doesn’t have a problem with Queenie moving to a zoo, but this particular display has only one half-acre for the animals to roam.

 

 “If they had expanded and enlarged that space and then said they wanted to take Queenie, I would have been fine with it.  But she’s been through enough,” said Doyle.

 

IDA’s elephant campaign director, Catherine Doyle feels differently.  “Queenie should be allowed to retire to the PAWS Sanctuary where she would have the best possible quality of life, including a 50-acre habitat to roam, high quality care, and the peace and quiet she deserves after a lifetime of suffering in the circus,” said Doyle.  “The San Antonio Zoo is just the wrong place for Queenie or any other elephant.”

 

Dr. Mel Richardson, a captive wildlife consultant and veterinarian who worked at the San Antonio Zoo from 1991 to 1995 is worried about the safety of Queenie and the zoo’s current pachyderm resident named Lucky. 

 

“Both Lucky and Queenie have histories of not getting along with other elephants.  Putting them together in an antiquated and too-small display is a recipe for disaster.  The key to safely and successfully integrating elephants’ starts with space and plenty of it,” said Richardson.

 

IDA and PAWS are wary the main reason Queenie is moving to the San Antonio Zoo is because of an arrangement they worked out with Davenport and the USDA.  Davenport was fined $100,000, but only has to pay $15,000 of that fine if he places Queenie elsewhere by Monday.  The agreement allows him to either sell or donate the elephant. Davenport also had his business and animal license permanently revoked as part of the deal.

 

Although documents do not show that the San Antonio Zoo agreed to pay him, Davenport recently stopped his negotiations for the PAWS sanctuary to take custody.

 

“PAWS does not pay for any animals,” said Derby.  “We had been negotiating with the circus owner to meet all of his demands, so there really was no reason to do this.”

 

Because Queenie was not confiscated by the USDA, they had no control over where she would be placed.  At this time no one knows if Davenport was paid for the elephant.

 

The San Antonio Zoo is accredited by the Association of Zoos and Aquariums and their elephant program is in compliance with federal animal welfare regulations.  But it would have been an act of kindness to place Queenie in a sanctuary after suffering years of mistreatment. 

 

IDA and PAWS are petitioning the USDA to create more strict requirements before reaching agreements with animal abusers. 

 

“They need criteria for placement of animals,” Derby said.  “It should be something that is a lovely retirement, not just being shoved into a small space.”

Click Here to sign the Petition to Help Move Queenie to the PAWS Sanctuary.

 

Read more: , , ,

Creative Commons mr_t_77

quick poll

vote now!

Loading poll...

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

189 comments

+ add your own
3:09AM PDT on Sep 24, 2010

I hope the people who should have Queenie's best interests at heart finally realise what it is she needs and that they understand that zoos are not the environment for elephants. It deeply saddens me to think she has been offered much more appropriate accommodation at the PAWS sanctuary but has ended up in a zoo. She needs some peace now after the life she's been forced to live.

1:15PM PDT on May 27, 2010

Hi Sherry, that is a fantastic idea, unfortunately I am in England, but I really do hope that others read this who are closer and are able to support you. x

12:09PM PDT on May 27, 2010

I live in S.A. If we can get enough people together from here or close by, willing to try and do something, a protest at the zoo, perhaps? I'm in then. Anybody else?

11:28AM PDT on May 18, 2010

What's really sick about this is that an elephant that was removed from one of the zoo's in Chicago after a long legal fight ended up dying while being transported to A DIFFERENT ZOO!

The USDA needs to take this more seriously. With the advent of the internet, kids and other people can see pictures and videos of animals more readily and from a perspective that is much closer than you'll see them in most zoos. No matter how big or realistic the enclosure is created by the zoo, they can never recreate the natural habitat of wild places... Animals know when they are captive and demonstrate behavioral actions that are UN-natural... Other than learning that captive animals aren't like their wild counterparts, what more can one learn from a live-animal zoo that one can't from a video-zoo???
WAKE UP, FDA!!!

2:29PM PDT on May 6, 2010

AW THE POOR THINGS THIS SHOULD NOT HAPPEN AT ALL. POOR ELEPHANTS AWW. I AM SO SO SAD ABOUT IT ALL.

10:22AM PDT on May 1, 2010

This is a really, really bad decision; both Queenie and Lucky need to be sent to a sanctuary NOW!!!

1:27PM PDT on Apr 30, 2010

It's sad Queenie finally gets rescued to go into another type of prison, in this case a very small enclosure. petition signed

2:46PM PDT on Apr 29, 2010

Leave the wild life in the jungles and forests

7:27AM PDT on Apr 29, 2010

I enjoy traveling and see animals at different facilities as long as they have the ability to thrive. If animals were supposed to be caged they would make their own cages. Animals are smart in the wild. They are able to get their own food, water, shelter and what ever else the need. Lets start letting animals do what they are created to do. There is a purpose for all creatures large and small.

8:08PM PDT on Apr 28, 2010

thanks

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

Care2 - Be Extraordinary - Start a Care2 Petition
ads keep care2 free
CONTACT THE EDITORS

Recent Comments from Causes

Poachers, when caught, should have to wear a snare themselves for a period of time to be taught a lesson…

Lucky man and lucky dog who found each other due to the lucky and good will action of this lady Samaritan.…

Oh joy, almost two years of this mind-numbing garbage to look forward to! Which one of the disgusting,…

meet our writers

Beth Buczynski Beth is a freelance writer and editor living in the Rocky Mountain West. So far, Beth has lived in... more
ads keep care2 free



Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.