START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x
887,471 people care about Women's Rights

Rand Paul Demands Vote On Fetal Personhood Before Flood Relief

Rand Paul Demands Vote On Fetal Personhood Before Flood Relief

It’s the start of hurricane season on the east coast, which makes it a perfect time for Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) to play abortion politics with federal flood relief dollars.

The faux-bertarian Senator moved this week to hold a bi-partisan flood insurance bill hostage until the Senate considers Paul’s unrelated “fetal personhood” measure which would give legal protections to fetuses from the moment of fertilization. Paul tacked the fetal personhood bill as an amendment to a bill that would bolder the National Flood Insurance Program. The bill had been expected to pass easily until Paul gummed up the works.

“I’m told last night that one of our Republican senators wants to offer an amendment — listen to this one — wants to offer an amendment on when life begins,” Reid said on the Senate floor Tuesday. “I am not going to put up with that on flood insurance. I can be condemned by outside sources; my friends can say, ‘Let them have a vote on it.’ There will not be a vote on that on flood insurance. We’ll either do flood insurance with the amendments that deal with flood insurance, or we won’t do it. We’ll have an extension.”

Paul has been out front in his crusade to criminalize pregnancy by granting legal rights to fetuses, so this move should come as little surprise. Besides, its not like the Paul brand of libertarianism embraces an expansive view of liberty–just the kind available to the white christian men of this country.

Related Stories:

Can The Tea Party Clean Up Its Racist Act?

Rand Paul Urges Congress To Ignore Roe v. Wade

What Gives? Rand Paul Endorses Mitt Romney [Video]

Read more: , , , , ,

Photo from gageskidmore via flickr.

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

195 comments

+ add your own
2:52PM PDT on Aug 12, 2012

A collection of cells that cannot survive on it's own outside the dead body of it's mother is **NOT** a person and does not have rights until it can breathe on it's own. If you are willing to let the mother die shut up about your "right to life" bull. Living people who have lost their homes and businesses are suffering right now and need help NOW not when your pet project is completed. That is blackmail pure and simple.

9:12AM PDT on Aug 9, 2012

Is Rand Paul a real person? I'd like him (it) to prove it.

12:20AM PDT on Jul 10, 2012

Crazy stuff---the article and the comments!! To put what MAY become a person in front of so many who already are is sad...scary even....

Perhaps instead of Rand Paul we need to put Ru Paul in office?

12:06AM PDT on Jul 10, 2012

I guess they call it politics for a reason...David K--your comment had me laughing out loud!! LOVE IT!!!

1:22PM PDT on Jul 1, 2012

so sad he even thinks such misguided priorities are appropriate representation of his constituents

7:14PM PDT on Jun 30, 2012

Use contraceptives? That the perfect solution -- though I think they should be covered like Obama wants. Doesn't matter how cheap there are people too poor to feed themselves -- making them the very people who would want access -- to afford contraceptives.

But if the GOP gets in their plan is not only ban abortions, but contraceptives too. Tell me how that makes sense? No contraceptives, no abortions and social assistant programs set up to help mothers and children cut to the bone or gotten rid of all together.

And Milan, fetuses are not people. A group of cells is not a person. You twist science around to suit your own personal beliefs. Fine, do that for yourself but I am sick and tired of people like you who think they control my body. NO YOU DON'T.

5:39AM PDT on Jun 30, 2012

If you don't want a baby then use birth control and make the man put a blanket on it. Birth control pills and condoms are not expensive.

3:36AM PDT on Jun 30, 2012

I will stick my neck out once more just for a moment and for the last time in this free-for-all. LD. B. - I didn't use the word “Person”. Neither did I refer to “U.S. Citizen” nor any other Semantic Ammunition. I restrict my argument to “Human and Alive”. I see the sanctity of Human Life once again under attack. Come back to me, when you are ready to deny those two simple claims I make for the poor helpless human foetus, whose very survival right is under attack. I believe the cause is our - very human - reluctance to accept responsibility for our actions, when it involves a certain amount of effort or sacrifice.

3:36AM PDT on Jun 30, 2012

I will stick my neck out once more just for a moment and for the last time in this free-for-all. LD. B. - I didn't use the word “Person”. Neither did I refer to “U.S. Citizen” nor any other Semantic Ammunition. I restrict my argument to “Human and Alive”. I see the sanctity of Human Life once again under attack. Come back to me, when you are ready to deny those two simple claims I make for the poor helpless human foetus, whose very survival right is under attack. I believe the cause is our - very human - reluctance to accept responsibility for our actions, when it involves a certain amount of effort or sacrifice.

12:08AM PDT on Jun 30, 2012

To add on abortion: I don't really care what you holy people think is life, and how you feel about abortion. Get out of my womb, and mind your own children. You talk about small government then intrude on my personal life. If I have a child and can't afford it, you are OK with letting that child suffer instead of paying to raise it properly. You don't believe in abortion, but you also hate to give welfare. You deplore abortion and expend untold amounts of energy to save a fetus, but you think its fine to bomb countries with untold numbers of pregnant women and living children. You deplore and spend your energies fighting a battle you can't win.
Do you even imagine for a moment that abortions will not take place, no matter what, no matter who legislates what? You anti-abortionists are so ridiculous. Keep your hypocritical and ignorant ideas within your own small circle of church folk and family because the world is a lot more complicated than you would understand.
Rand wants small government but he wants to save the unwanted unborn---this does not compute, therefore Rand is a selfish, ignorant hypocrite.

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

ads keep care2 free
Story idea? Want to blog? Contact the editors!
ads keep care2 free



Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.