START A PETITION 27,000,000 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x
919,934 people care about Women's Rights

Repro Wrap: Anti-Abortion Activists Lose Eugenics Talking Point and Other News

Repro Wrap: Anti-Abortion Activists Lose Eugenics Talking Point and Other News

Abortion providers prey on communities of color. That has been the talking point that has fired the anti-abortion movement for decades, while some groups tout birth control and abortion as a eugenics plot and others grabbing a civil rights movement mantle for themselves. But is there any fact behind that claim? No, apparently. According to new research, abortion clinics actually aren’t more prevalent in minority communities.

“About six in 10 abortion providers are located in neighborhoods where more than half of residents are White,” writes Ebony Magazine, citing new statistics from Guttmacher Institute. “Fewer than one in 10 abortion providers are located in neighborhoods where more than half of residents are Black. Some 13% of abortion providers are located in neighborhoods where more than half of residents are Hispanic.”

Unsurprisingly, the anti-abortion movement is rejecting the data. “Pro-life groups do not accept such data, saying other data show that minority communities are targeted,” reports the Washington Times, adding that one anti-abortion group claims their own figures stating 79 percent of Planned Parenthood clinics are in minority neighborhoods are “rock solid.”

Of course, both sides could technically be right, since not all abortion providers are part of Planned Parenthood, and not all Planned Parenthoods provide abortions, meaning both sides are talking about two different sets of data.

In Missouri, the governor vetoed the state’s new 72 hour waiting period prior to an abortion, and the legislature is not pleased. Especially not bill sponsor State Sen. David Sater, who is trying to gather the support to override Governor Nixon’s veto. “I firmly believe that most Missourians do not think three days is too much time to decide whether to bring a child into this world,” said the bill’s sponsor to the local news. If so, that’s news to the people of Missouri. In recent polling, 80 percent of the respondents said they have concerns about lengthening the waiting period to 72 hours.

Whether or not the veto is overridden, just getting a veto in the first place is fantastic news and signals a shift in the political battle over abortion restrictions. I explain why at Talking Points Memo.

Political candidates are still reeling from the Hobby Lobby decision in the Supreme Court, with the Massachusetts Republican governor candidate stepping in it when he said he really didn’t think it would affect women in the state. He has now changed his tune, claiming he never meant that he was anti-birth control access. Over at Slate, Dahlia Lithwick discusses how this term’s Supreme Court rulings turned into a literal “men’s team vs. women’s team,” and the women’s team lost. Chicago’s mayor considers a ballot amendment to protect birth control access, and Senate Democrats at the Hill are drafting a bill as well.

Abortion opponents are using lawsuits to scare states and cities out of enforcing clinic buffer zones in the wake of another recent Supreme Court ruling. So does this mean anti-abortion protesters are getting bolder? Could be, if California is any indication, where protesters got into a physical skirmish in Orange County as they picketed an abortion provider’s home. Also, in Portland, Maine, protesters are back outside the door at Planned Parenthood, telling women they are “murdering their babies.”

Anti-abortion activists in Ohio are hitting the national media up with their story about being “violently attacked” on the streets while touting graphic abortion posters. What they aren’t mentioning is that the mother of the woman who attacked them reached out to ask them to go gently on her daughter, explaining that she is autistic and that ”[autistic people] feel so much that they don’t know how to filter out things so they just act.”

It’s been over a year since North Carolina passed a bill to write new regulations for abortion providers, and so far nothing has been written. Now that the only clinic in the state that could definitely have stayed open regardless of the new rules that are drafted has been closed, expect to see regulations suddenly hurried up. Meanwhile, Alabama activists are fighting to raise the funds to get pregnant people to new clinics now that the Huntsville clinic, the only provider in northern Alabama, is closed temporarily. The doctors at the Wisconsin clinic being held open during legal challenges admit they’d like to retire but can’t, because there is no one to take over.

With clinics disappearing left and right, some are considering taking abortion back into their own hands, and underground, just like in the days prior to the Roe v. Wade decision.

A Tennessee woman becomes the first to be charged under the state’s new drug law that jails women who test positive for amphetamine use when they give birth, and a Texas woman is in danger of a stillbirth because the jail she is in won’t provider her with her needed methadone dose.

Finally, a “feminist provider” discusses why patients need autonomy in healthcare and access, and a must read on what it is like to tell your abortion story. And in good news, states are passing slightly less anti-abortion restrictions than in the past few years. Of course, that could be because there is so little left still to restrict.

Read more: , , , , , , ,

Photo credit: Thinkstock

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

96 comments

+ add your own
3:41AM PDT on Jul 18, 2014

all this anti-choice, forced birth, anti-birth control legislation is not about what THEY want us to think it is. Part of is, yes, is about control...

however... the largest part of it, (the part that's funding the teathugliban, the part that's funding and promoting the anti-choice legislators, the part that's funding the churches and religious organizations - ARE CORPORATIONS! HUGELY KOCH OWNED)

This push for forced birthing is about ECONOMICS.

People in control of their own reproduction are frequently CHOOSING NOT TO REPRODUCE which affects the KOCH BROTHERS BOTTOM LINE!

Wake up and smell the greed! They don't care if people WANT the kids, so long as they HAVE them and they live long enough to become CONSUMERS who spend MONEY whether they have it or not.

This is about economics and the drive for ever increasing profits, and with the boomers retiring and dying of diseases of manufactured origin the MONEY is stalling, the INCOME is stalling and the profits are leveling off and that is NOT a tenable state of being for corporations OR their owners and shareholders.

12:48AM PDT on Jul 18, 2014

Thank you for sharing!

12:43PM PDT on Jul 14, 2014

David B
“how can the pro lifers profess to know dick , when they don't even know the difference between a fetus and a baby ?”

or fertilized ovum, implantation.

Marianne c
“Be gentle with poor old Freddy/Jacob/Steve. You have to remember that he's working with the kind of brain that zombies refer to as "lo-calorie."

HAHAHA!

“And they’ll say it just as if any man out there could actually tolerate 40 weeks of puking, swelling, aching, hormonal misery followed by 36 hours of crucifixion.”

Since men don't get pregnant, it would be awesome if a woman scientist invented a pill or shot that simulates pregnancy from conception to birth... the whole 9 months. That could be given to men who think women should only have sex to procreate.

Monica O
“Our very dignity as humans is under siege! We care more about wild and domesticated animals than we do about our fellow humans”

not so, we just know the 'scientific' difference between “our fellow humans” and a fertilized ovum, implantation, zygote, fetus, embryo, baby.

11:49AM PDT on Jul 14, 2014

Keep on keepin' on ... Hobby Lobby, buffer zones, war on women.

Bottom line is those who believe abortion is MURDER, believe -- those who don't, won't ... never the two shall meet and so the rift continues.

Great fodder for political points though.

6:53AM PDT on Jul 14, 2014

Wow, how can the conservative right even try to use the arguement that abortion clinics target minority communities as a form of eugenics? It is the conservative right that held and holds to racism. The equal rights/progressive/liberals don't have the KKK or tried to justify slavery. Or are anti-immigration. The conservative right tries to draw differences everywhere for many reasons while the liberal left tries to draw people together. This is really a case of projecting rationalization. Like when gay people run around claiming homosexuallity is immoral and against God while have gay sex themselves. It's the conservative right claiming they don't discriminate or are racist or bigoted of minorities just as long those people don't come to their country, live in their neighborhoods, engage in interracial marraiges, demand equal rites and if everything goes right just accept slavery as they are lesser than white people.'What? That's racist?' They probably don't even recognize they are doing it. And those who are pro women's rights have to supply an arguement against it.

8:54PM PDT on Jul 13, 2014

Monica~~~

What your god approves or disapproves is of no consequence to the laws of our nation. There is a reason for the first amendment. The Founders decreed the separation of church and state to defend us from the theological magical thinking of organized religions.
The same people who scream that we are threatened by Sharia Law (which is not only bs but projection) are attempting to force Mosaic/ Judeo-Christian Law upon those of us who do not accept it.
You are free to believe as you will.

SO AM I.

8:54PM PDT on Jul 13, 2014

Monica~~~

What your god approves or disapproves is of no consequence to the laws of our nation. There is a reason for the first amendment. The Founders decreed the separation of church and state to defend us from the theological magical thinking of organized religions.
The same people who scream that we are threatened by Sharia Law (which is not only bs but projection) are attempting to force Mosaic/ Judeo-Christian Law upon those of us who do not accept it.
You are free to believe as you will.

SO AM I.

8:54PM PDT on Jul 13, 2014

Monica~~~

What your god approves or disapproves is of no consequence to the laws of our nation. There is a reason for the first amendment. The Founders decreed the separation of church and state to defend us from the theological magical thinking of organized religions.
The same people who scream that we are threatened by Sharia Law (which is not only bs but projection) are attempting to force Mosaic/ Judeo-Christian Law upon those of us who do not accept it.
You are free to believe as you will.

SO AM I.

5:29PM PDT on Jul 13, 2014

Monica O. How do you know god disapproves of abortion? If he did, why would he perform millions himself, in the form of miscarriage?

3:02PM PDT on Jul 13, 2014

Noted

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

Care2 - Be Extraordinary - Start a Care2 Petition
ads keep care2 free
CONTACT THE EDITORS

Recent Comments from Causes

My mom was like this Australian mom. Not that we ever got expensive presents - our presents tended to…

You are way ahead of us, Mexico! Congratulations!

I'm not holding my breath for the US to make that decision :-/

meet our writers

Lindsay Spangler Lindsay Spangler is a Web Editor and Producer for Care2 Causes. A recent UCLA graduate, she lives in... more
ads keep care2 free

more from causes

Animal Welfare

Causes Canada

Causes UK

Children

Civil Rights

Education

Endangered Wildlife

Environment & Wildlife

Global Development

Global Warming

Health Policy

Human Rights

LGBT rights

Politics

Real Food

Trailblazers For Good

Women's Rights




Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.