START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x
810,446 people care about Civil Rights

Won’t Someone Think of the Children?

Won’t Someone Think of the Children?

This week we’ve heard a great deal of testimony from the Proposition 8 court case about the historical and cultural implications of marriage. In expert testimony, we’ve also been told how, traditionally, the idea of “protecting children” from homosexuality has been used to block attempts at furthering gay rights such as basic employment non discrimination ordinances, and how today it is one of the arguments this is used to prevent equal access to marriage and adoption rights.

An example of this occurred last week when Portuguese lawmakers approved a bill that would allow same-sex marriage, and because President Aníbal Cavaco Silva is not expected to veto the bill, civil marriage for gay and lesbian couples in Portugal looks almost certain to become a reality.

This is a considerable victory for LGBT rights in the country. Yet the bill also sort to allow same-sex couples the right to adopt and unfortunately this provision was removed with lawmakers citing that it was necessary for child welfare reasons. So, while it seems entirely fitting that advocates should celebrate this move toward equality, the victory is somewhat bruised. 

Portugal isn’t the only place where the issues of gay adoption and same-sex marriage are causing debate this month. Mexico City became the first Latin American region to pass a civil same-sex marriage bill in December of last year. Interestingly, this wasn’t what received the most attention. Rather, it was the bill’s broad reworking of how marriage was defined that drew staunch criticism because, in one elegant and emancipating stroke, the bill also allowed same-sex couples the right to adopt.

Now, a legal challenge has been launched by social and religious conservatives that aims to prevent the law from being enacted. The challenge calls the legislation “unconstitutional” and against “Christian principles”.

The main argument that being put forward against the bill can be found referenced in this article from the Houston Chronicle:

“That is “a bad and perverse law,” Cardinal Norberto Rivera, the Mexican church’s senior clergyman, pronounced after the initiative was passed. While expressing “respect” for people with “different tendencies” the cardinal said same-sex couples “can’t pretend that they’re a family, that they can adopt children.”

What strikes me most are the words that Cardinal Norbeto Rivera uses. Same-sex couples “can’t pretend that they’re a family, that they can adopt children.”

It underpins a major prejudice surrounding homosexual unions that undermines any “respect” that the Cardinal professes to have for LGBTs. It infers that same-sex parent families are false, pretend, and poor substitutes for heterosexual families.

What’s interesting is the notion that, simply because a couple have bound themselves by that frequently hyped gold standard that is a heterosexual marriage, they are now, as if by magic, suddenly endowed with all the qualities needed to be good and loving parents and spouses, and that by the mere utterance of marriage vows they have been transformed into shining paragons of virtue. Give me a break! 

Events in Portugal or even Mexico City may seem quite remote to people in the US, yet the same arguments are being applied here too.

In Florida, for instance, gay people are banned from adopting. The law reads, “No person eligible to adopt under this statute may adopt if that person is a homosexual.”

Let’s take a minute just to appreciate the truly awful sentiment behind that, shall we? And the pro Prop. 8 legal team would like us to believe that LGBTs don’t face discrimination anymore? Read fellow Care2 blogger Scott P’s brilliant post about Florida’s gay adoption ban here. However, the basic idea of the law is this: that it’s necessary for the well-being of Florida’s children.

A piece of good news on that front, though. Award winning ‘out’ actress Cynthia Nixon, from Sex and the City fame, has joined the fight to have Florida’s ban on homosexual adoptive parents overturned, as has Republican Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen. They’ll both be attending several events that aim to educate “Floridians about the adoption ban and the negative impact it has on Florida’s children and families” according to the American Civil Liberties Union which is organizing the campaign.

Another story that was in the news recently comes from Utah. State Representative Christine Johnson recently announced that she is carrying a child for a gay couple who are her close friends.

Utah prevents unmarried couples from adopting, so they have a de facto gay adoption ban because they don’t recognize same-sex marriages either so while the biological father will be recognized as a parent, his partner will not.

Johnson, who isn’t charging for her services as a surrogate, told the Salt Lake Tribune that:

“I can very much empathize with their desire to become parents and share their lives with and open their hearts to a child… To watch [the gay couple] get emotional when we look at the ultrasound and we see their baby, it is so gratifying for me to know I’m helping them become a family. They are, in concert, just going to be perfect parents.”

The courageous Christine Johnson, who is both a lesbian and a mom herself, has said that she plans to remain in the child’s life as an aunt rather than as the child’s mother. She is aware that other lawmakers and her constituents may find her decision to be surrogate challenging, however, she emphasizes that, while certain colleagues have expressed their opinion that heterosexual families are “optimal”, most, if not all, have been supportive. Again the news here is largely positive, but there’s that little grain of prejudice.

However, this warmth of feeling is not always demonstrated in other states even if those states don’t have specific adoption bans. In this instance LGBTs are left to the mercy of various adoption agencies and judges, which can sometimes be a positive affair but can also bring about negative situations too. This CNN article from 2007 details how one judge decided to make her feelings about gay adoption known :

Others face opposition after being approved for adoption or foster care. For the Manford-Roach family, difficulties arose when they first tried to hyphenate Jackson’s last name.

The judge overseeing the legal procedure in Dallas, Texas, crumpled up the paper and threw it over her shoulder when she realized they were a same-sex couple, Manford said.

“Get out of my courtroom, I would never do this for you,” the judge said, according to Manford.

In short, even if no specific ban exists, same-sex couples trying to become parents in the US, whether through adoption, surrogacy or other means, face many hurdles and many prejudices. It all seems to hinge, however, on one argument. That it’s about doing what’s best for the children. That being gay makes prospective parents intrinsically not as good as heterosexual parents.

Well, what is the negative impact on a child that results from having same-sex parents? The answer, according to most current, verifiable research, is that there is none. There’s no effect. From the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry:

Current research shows that children with gay and lesbian parents do not differ from children with heterosexual parents in their emotional development or in their relationships with peers and adults. It is the quality of the parent/child relationship and not the parent’s sexual orientation that has an effect on a child’s development. Contrary to popular belief, children of lesbian, gay, or transgender parents:

  • Are not more likely to be gay than children with heterosexual parents.
  • Are not more likely to be sexually abused.
  • Do not show differences in whether they think of themselves as male or female (gender identity).
  • Do not show differences in their male and female behaviors (gender role behavior).

These findings are also supported by groups such as the Child Welfare League of America and the National Association of Social Workers. You can go here to find a list of more organizations that have official policies that support same-sex parents.

Yet still, the pro Proposition 8 team would have you believe that they’re only protecting the “traditional” definition of marriage, and that, by extension, it’s for the sake of procreation, the family unit, and the children of America. From a 2008 LA Times article when the Proposition 8 campaign was in its final stages and only the most effective tactics would do:

Still, recognizing how politically potent the issue is, the Yes on 8 campaign has made it the center of its television advertising campaign.

“Mom, guess what I learned in school today?” a little girl says in one spot. “I learned how a prince married a prince.” As the girl’s mother makes a horrified face, a voice says: “Think it can’t happen? It’s already happened. . . . Teaching about gay marriage will happen unless we pass Proposition 8.”

It’s a smoke and mirrors argument. There is nothing in the Californian state education code that requires schools to say anything about marriage. Could it come up? Yes, under certain circumstances, more of which you can read about here. But could it still come up with Proposition 8 in effect? Yes, just as easily, because gay people are still around, still raising children. In both instances, the subject would almost certainly have to be included as part of sex-education classes, and so parents would have to be informed first and would then have the ability to withdraw their child from that class.

Instead, what happens under Proposition 8 – and under the federal Defense of Marriage Act – is that same-sex couples and their families are relegated to civil unions or domestic partnerships, and are unable to access the 1,138 benefits that are open to married heterosexual couples. What a great gift of inequality to force on children who have same-sex parents.

Also what about the children that are themselves growing up to realize that they’re gay, bisexual, lesbian or transgender? It’s convenient to forget about them. But perpetuating this idea that gay couples should not adopt, and that anything to do with homosexuality should not be talked about near children for fear that it might rub off on them, well, that’s a great message to pass on to vulnerable adolescents – that they’re infectious, dangerous, and not worthy of the same rights and human dignity as the rest of society.

On Thursday, Judge Vaughn Walker, who is presiding over the Proposition 8 court case, heard how bans on gay marriage and inequality under civil law adds to the social stigma LGBTs face and how that, in turn, may contribute to depression and the high suicide rate among homosexuals and homosexual adolescents.

So the next time someone says “Won’t someone think of the children?” when it comes to equal marriage and adoption rights, perhaps you’ll answer back: “Let’s think about ALL the children, shall we?”

Meanwhile, the Courage Campaign is running a live blog on the Prop. 8 trial so that you can keep up with events in the court room as they happen. You can follow it by clicking here.

You can also follow the case on Twitter via the Twitter Feed of the American Foundation for Equal Rights.

Related Reading:

Care2 Related Reading:


 

HAITI INFORMATION AND ACTIONS

INFORMATION

How to Help Haiti

Long-Term Health Problems Facing Haiti After Earthquake

Haiti in Chaos After Earthquake

Help Haiti: a Day Without Pay

Pat Robertson is Going to Hell 

Rescue Dogs Sent to Haiti from Around the World

Haiti After the Quake + How to Help

Animal Victims in Haiti Need Your Help

PETITIONS:

Haitian Earthquake Has Destroyed the Capital City   Mercy Corps

Haiti’s reconstruction by Haitians living aboard     For these noble goals, we ask that the government of the country in which we reside to task our pay check $10 per pay period for the next 50 years so that we can rebuild our dear Haiti.

Pat Robertson: APOLOGIZE

Support the UN’s Response to Haiti Quake Victims  United Nations Foundation

Honor UN Peacekeepers in Haiti Better World Campaign

Read more: , , , , , , , , , ,


Photo used under the Creative Commons Attribution License, with thanks to nerdcoregirl.

quick poll

vote now!

Loading poll...

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

116 comments

+ add your own
1:08AM PDT on Jun 26, 2011

"We are all responsible for our actions. We are responsible for living our life ethically and morally.

AND that must be passed to the children as they are the future!

5:34PM PST on Feb 9, 2010

Children need love and care. They do not have to be related in any way to their caregivers. Single, married, same sex partners--does not matter. The caregivers sexual orientation has no bearing on the ability to love and care for children.

8:36AM PST on Feb 3, 2010

Good parents are those who are capable of loving the child, rearing and raising the child, and spending time with them. Sexual orientation doesn't matter. It's not as if homosexual couples talk about their sexual exploits with their kids any more than heterosexual couples do.

1:36PM PST on Jan 23, 2010

Thank you very much for this very good article.
And I would add this : The people who "want to think of the children" whose parents could be homosexuals, are the same parents that NEVER asked their own children if they wanted to be christians, or not.
The same parents that believe being as they are is just the best, be they christians, buddhists, muslims or atheists, divorced (how is that for a happy moment as a child to go through?), or even arguing all the time and hating one another (but staying together is "good for the kid") etc...
Never asked their kids before, and never will.
Hypocrisy as always, because all other ways to prevent others from being free and happy have failed.

I am a social worker. I have seen thousands of kids. You know what makes them suffer most ?

It is their parents' unhappiness.

All parents can be unhappy. Homosexual parents are not likely to be more unhappy than say... Black parents, living in the Bible Belt. And they can be as happy as everyone, provided they stop being judged for what they naturally are.

Happiness is NOT depending on sexual orientation.

Or the anciant Greeks would not have been such a brilliant civilization, folks !
;-)

9:27PM PST on Jan 22, 2010

Jack T.: The only people who are "deviant" as you put it, besides actual molestors, are the people who think that it's any of their business what other people do as consenting adults in their private lives.

If you look into any reputable statistics at all, you will find that the vast majority of sex offenders are men who identify as "heterosexual." Same sex couples are statistically far less likely to be abusers than people you would categorize as "normal."

Now, if you consider it abuse to teach a child that all love is love, that heart + heart = family, then I don't think we can continue this conversation, because you and I are too far apart. I grew up in a single-parent family because my father died. I would have given anything to have had two parents, so that I didn't feel like my mom was burdened so much. I can tell you in all honesty that if the other parent was a kind, compassionate, and loving adult, it would not have mattered to me what age, color, gender, or even religion that person was.

Love is blind, kind, forgiving, and unconditional. If it isn't those things, it's not love. Better for a child to grow up experiencing love than to have to watch parents trapped in an untrue, unloving relationship because they're gay in a hetero marriage.

The notion that all any gay person needs is the right person of the opposite gender is as stupid as saying that all any straight guy really needs is a good deep dicking.

9:46PM PST on Jan 20, 2010

Also Jack T, teaching children prejudices such as homophobia and racism is a form of child abuse.

9:45PM PST on Jan 20, 2010

"You are obviously still little more than a child yourself."

I'm old enough and smart enough to know that LGBT community is every bit as equal as the hetero community. I'll take my same-sex parents over opposite-sex parents any day.

"They know nothing different."

I know a few wonderful children with wonderful same-sex parents who could tell you just how very wrong you are.

Your real parents are the people who love you, not the people who gave birth to you. It's really sad that you're too wrapped up in your selfishness and prejudices to see that.

"You are not content even with equality - you seem to constantly strive to prove that L&G is the norm and that it is the heteros who are deviant."

Considering that homosexuality occurs in over 1,500 animal species plus humans, homosexuality is very much the norm. However, the real deviants are the people who spread lies to turn people against the LGBT community. The deviants are the homophobes.

Question Jack T, do you support the death penalty against homosexuals in Uganda?

3:41PM PST on Jan 20, 2010

Jack, I don't think you help your argument by your personal and derogatory comments. I take it you are not a teacher. Usually, it works better to take anyone's comments or questions and deal with them instead of turning personal. I find that usually the louder someone yells or when people attack the messenger the less cohesive their argument.

10:38AM PST on Jan 20, 2010

Jack, the more you preach intolerance the less anyone is likely to take you seriously.

To everyone who's mind is actually open - let's not forget the REAL question. The question is not who makes the best parents but whether a child who has NO parents is better off with two who will love them the best way they can.

Whether the biological mom and dad are better than adoptive parents all depends on the people involved. Children need to be exposed to a variety of people to learn and grow and develop. Regardless of whether the parents are male or female or both the child is not going to grow up in a vacuum - there will be ALL kinds of people in the healthy child's life.

So, if we focus on what's important, we will only ask whether a child who has no parents isn't better off being adopted than growing up without parents. The only qualifications that the adoptive parents must have - and believe me, these are a heck of a lot more qualifications than the biological parents must have - is that they can love the child and have no history of child or animal abuse. I include animal abuse because it is often an indicator of child abuse and studies show that animal abusers often abuse children, too.

And that really is the real question.

10:18AM PST on Jan 20, 2010

Satah: "My godparents, both married women, have raised a beautiful and wonderful, if immature and pigheaded at times, son and he likes all the same stuff an average teenage boy likes - sports, video games, women."

I'm sorry, Sarah, I didn't check out your profile before posting previously. You are obviously still little more than a child yourself. But I feel sorry that someone so young should have such views about the opposite sex as the 'immature & pigheaded' comments above show. I hope you meet a nice boy that comes up to your standards one day.

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

Ron then claims: (Yes, god has shown itself and proved just who it is through jebus (who is god). So…

Those who have never been that poor are not qualified to condemn. You can't even imagine what it's like.…

"Fish Take A Hike: Is This How Land Animals Came About?" ~ That's been the consensus among evolutionary…

meet our writers

Steve Williams Steve Williams is a passionate supporter of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Trans (LGBT) rights, human... more
Story idea? Want to blog? Contact the editors!
ads keep care2 free



Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.