19,344,293 members doing good!

The Environment & Wildlife Cause

1,458,441 people care about Environment & Wildlife




Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.

Sea Turtles Win in Court

102 comments Sea Turtles Win in Court

More sea turtles died or became disabled in the BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico than in any other event in the past two decades, according to the National Wildlife Federation, the Sea Turtle Conservancy and the Florida Wildlife Federation.  Struggling against the oil spill and other pollution, being entangled in fishing nets, seawalls and cold weather, sea turtles have had a rough year. Since it can take them up to 30 years to mature, which requires safe sands along the coast, restoring their populations can take decades. 

The federal court could help. On Wednesday, January 26, a settlement was reached that requires the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to consult with the Fish and Wildlife Service and National Marine Fisheries Service under the Endangered Species Act before approving insurance under the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) for new construction. The environmental groups will have 11 months to complete a biological assessment.

Two environmental groups – the National Wildlife Federation and Florida Wildlife Federation – filed a lawsuit requiring the study of the impacts on the sea turtle’s nesting grounds before insurance is approved. Four of the species, green, hawksbill, leather back and Kemp’s ridley, are endangered.

While it doesn’t grant new protections for sea turtles, it may prevent new development in sensitive areas and nesting grounds. According to the Florida Wildlife Federation, Florida’s beaches make up 90 percent of the nesting habitat for turtles in the U.S. 

“Of all the species affected by the oil spill, those for which I have the greatest concern are the sea turtles,” said Doug Inkley, senior scientist at the National Wildlife Federation.

The settlement will have some impact on the state and on the federal flood insurance program that losses from Hurricane Katrina put $18 billion in the red. The settlement focuses on stopping FEMA from issuing new policies in areas highest at risk to flooding and ending renewals for coastal structures damaged by storms and erosion. “Subsidizing development in storm surge areas not only destroys habitat, but also puts communities at risk and wastes billions of dollars of taxpayer money,” said Manley Fuller, President of the Florida Wildlife Federation.

In 2005 NWF succeeded in blocking federal flood insurance on new construction in the Florida Keys in fragile habitat that sustains rare creatures like the Key deer. The courts ruling covered several hundred acres of privately owned land.

The environmental groups point out that in the long-term, the rulings will benefit us all by reducing liability and protecting lands that bring in millions of tourists.

Read more: , , , , , , , ,

creative commons

quick poll

vote now!

Loading poll...

102 comments

+ add your own
10:15AM PDT on Aug 26, 2011

yhx

9:10AM PDT on Aug 11, 2011

I sincerely hope this action will help all wildlife in the areas affected, but especially the sea turtles. This area is a large portion of their natural habitat. People have the choice to build just about anywhere - they need to consider what they are doing and the consequences on the wildlife that lives there without a choice......

9:31AM PDT on May 13, 2011

Great Article.....Thanks for information.

Thanks,
http://www.theoliveridleyturtle.com

11:11AM PST on Feb 26, 2011

great title, I can just imagine a turtle slapping the judge with his flipper.. :) that image gives me joy. Thanks for the report.

6:31PM PST on Feb 22, 2011

Hope for the best. At least it is a start.

2:45AM PST on Feb 13, 2011

Other creatures have also the right to live, not just us, people at the exense of others. I hope the sea turtles will benefit from this Act.

12:23PM PST on Feb 9, 2011

Hoping so much that this will help ...

2:07AM PST on Feb 9, 2011

I remember once seeing a news magazine show that showed how folks would rebuild very expensive homes time and time again after flooding along the coastline because federal flood insurance would pay for it. Maybe they should only pay to rebuild in a non-flood, non-eco-sensitive zone. Then those areas should be set aside.

5:20PM PST on Feb 8, 2011

noted and thanx

1:22PM PST on Feb 8, 2011

Leaning yes and hoping for the best.

add your comment

20
20 log in or sign up to start earning Butterfly Credits today!


Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

We don't see why the USA send Pakistan a billion dollars are year when we have a deficit in this country.…

Beth your question about Rommey reminds me of something that would be comming from the mouth of the Chairperson…

meet our writers

Alicia Graef Alicia Graef is a lifelong animal lover with a BS in Animal and Veterinary Science and years of... more
Story idea? Want to blog? Contact the editors!

customize your newsletter

This newsletter will be sent daily and will feature updates on all the causes you care about. Which causes would you like to include?

Copyright © 2012 Care2.com, inc. and its licensors. All rights reserved