START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x
1,365,925 people care about Politics

Sen. Feinstein Wants to Strip Independent Journalists’ Rights

Sen. Feinstein Wants to Strip Independent Journalists’ Rights

Freedom of the press may be one of the founding principles of the United States, but Senator Dianne Feinstein is on a mission to limit these powers.  The fourth-term California Democrat has proposed an amendment to narrow the definition of journalism and give privileges to only those she deems “real reporters.”

Currently, most states have shield laws designed to protect journalists, but no such laws exist on a federal level. Recently, the Senate Judiciary Committee approved national shield laws, but Feinstein was unhappy with how broadly journalist could be interpreted and wrote up an amendment to address her personal concerns.


Feinstein discusses her amendment in a Senate meeting.

Feinstein’s suggestion is blatantly unconstitutional. The First Amendment is clear: “Congress shall make no law… abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press,” yet here is a member of Congress trying to do precisely that. By applying a strict definition to who can be considered a journalist, Feinstein is not only discrediting, but also destructing independent and citizen journalism.

Shield laws allow reporters to protect their sources and prevent them from having to testify against them in court. These laws are safeguards that ensure critical news is disseminated and the populace remains informed without government interference.

Feinstein seems chiefly concerned with affiliates of Wikileaks and other such agencies calling themselves journalists. She has been one of the most vocal Senators in calling for prosecuting Julian Assange, Chelsea Manning and Edward Snowden for espionage. Evidently, publicizing some of the most critical information of our time that other more “reputable” agencies wouldn’t touch does not count as an act of journalism, particularly when the leaked info makes Feinstein look bad.

Indeed, despite alleging that she wants to protect only “legitimate journalists,” Feinstein has a history of showing no respect for legitimate journalists. On a trip to China while serving as San Francisco’s mayor, Feinstein told Evelyn Hsu, an American reporter, that she preferred Chinese reporters, explaining, “They just write down what we say.

Feinstein’s limited definition of a journalist is “someone who is an employee, agent, or independent contractor for a media entity.” In an act of compromise, she did agree to take out the word “salaried” from her description of a journalist, though she called it an “unnecessary worry.” From my vantage point, restricting “real” reporting to jobs paid for by corporate entities is hardly an illegitimate concern.

How many people even trust mainstream media anymore? Print publishing is slowly dying, while cable news has devolved into corporate-sponsored propaganda disguised as “infotainment.” For crying out loud, MSNBC reporter Chuck Todd just told us that it isn’t his job to expose political lies. If Feinstein’s mission is to limit freedoms of the press to entities in the pocket of the powerful and wealthy, the real goal must be to further obscure the truth… while holding those who actually report the truth responsible for daring to expose it.

In her explanation for redefining journalists, Feinstein asks, “Should this privilege apply to anyone? To a 17-year-old who drops out of high school, buys a website for $5, and starts a blog?” Her comment reeks of classism and elitism, as if an average young citizen couldn’t offer valuable information to the public.

The fact is we need citizen journalists, independent media outlets and bloggers like those here at Care2.com more than ever. We need reporters who challenge authority, conduct actual investigations, cover all stories and spread the truth. Just because what these journalists reveal might be a little too “real” for Feinstein doesn’t make their work any less “real.”

Sign this petition to tell Dianne Feinstein to stop attempting to dismantle the First Amendment. A free press is essential to maintaining a healthy democracy free of corruption.

Read more: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Photo Credit: David Lee

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

173 comments

+ add your own
1:42PM PST on Nov 3, 2013

Anytime anyone wants to squash a story it normally is because they don't like the sting of truth that goes with it. If any idea or story can't stand the sting of review then the reporter must be doing a darn good job. Slander laws protect people from lies so why hide behind new rules unless some can't handle being under the microscope. Shame so many swallow her rhetoric as gospel and want to give her pats on the back for great job. Time for all politcians to get the same scrutiny in both parties and both house including the WHITE one. Their actions and record should always be up for public review and access.. Mine was while working by the higher adminstration. Should be no different for anyone in any job. Especially politicans.

12:17PM PST on Nov 3, 2013

So basically she just wants journalists who write down what she tells them. The corporate media already pretty much does that, so she wants to prevent anyone else from exposing government crimes or asking real questions. I hope California votes this moron out of office.

11:35AM PST on Nov 3, 2013

This infuriates me. The last amendment to the bill is written to prevent any newcomer who isn't affiliated with a mainstream news source to be cut off before he/she begins. It's an example of that dilemma facing young people looking for work or credit and being told they don't qualify because they have no experience/other credit. This is much worse, in my opinion, because it stands to prevent the very group of people most likely to turn a doomed system around to one that works and will enable us to prosper. If I were one of these "youngsters", I'd be bloody furious because they are being charged with the huge task of cleaning up the mess that has been made for them by older generations while, at the same time, having their hands tied by those very generations to do anything about it. This is stupidity at its most dangerous.
I'm also concerned about the term "bona fide". I take it that Ms. Feinstein means a journalist is required to have a degree or diploma to be counted in these ranks. That's just nonsense. While it is certainly necessary at times for schooling to be a requirement (I wouldn't, for example, want a self appointed surgeon putting me under the knife), this is not one of those times. A good journalist is one who writes clearly and checks his/her sources and facts. God knows that isn't the case right now.....so called bona fide journalists have been proven to report as news, press releases - written verbatim;

1:14PM PDT on Oct 3, 2013

While Republicans get a lot of publicity for being rotten. It seems some Democrats are just as bad they just try to look better.

I want reporters to go after the news.

8:47AM PDT on Oct 2, 2013

Is it ever good to suppress the truth?

7:48PM PDT on Sep 30, 2013

"There WERE plenty of channels he/she could have gone through & he/she chose NOT to go through them"
Ever ask yourself WHY he didn't go through them? Well people who actually TRIED going through channels to say it's because they don't work. In fact part of the reason he did what he did was that he DID attempt to go through channels, and was told (illegally) to shut up. The Obusha administration does not want reports of abuses going up through proper channels.

7:26PM PDT on Sep 30, 2013

Feinstein has ALWAYS been on the side of evil.

5:12PM PDT on Sep 29, 2013

ty

6:22AM PDT on Sep 29, 2013

TIME TO CLEAR THE RELICS (CAREER POLITICIANS) OUT OF WASHINGTON ... way too comfortable and powerful to continue playing with the rights of we the people for their personal gain and favor.

Pick-and-choose is NOT an option extended to Feinstein. Freedom of speech is just that, free and allowed. It's what makes us who we are, what we believe in, and provides a basis for discussion and adjustment if and as needed. To attempt to squelch this right is, in my opinion, another increase in government and decrease in freedom, coming at us from all sides. Stay tuned ...



1:10AM PDT on Sep 29, 2013

thanks for sharing

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

Recent Comments from Causes

I'm glad that all of these issues got good press, but just like the marches, only one had an actual breakthrough…

My condolences for your loss as well Karen. I know what it's like to lose a partner, it was 10 years…

We literally cannot afford industrial agriculture in the long run and need to grow almost everything…

Story idea? Want to blog? Contact the editors!
ads keep care2 free

more from causes

Animal Welfare

Causes Canada

Causes UK

Children

Civil Rights

Education

Endangered Wildlife

Environment & Wildlife

Global Development

Global Warming

Health Policy

Human Rights

LGBT rights

Politics

Real Food

Trailblazers For Good

Women's Rights




Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.