Notice! Care2 will go offline for site maintenance July 28 at 9pm PST. Thanks
START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x
2,486,337 people care about Environment & Wildlife

Shell Sues Sierra Club and Other Environmental Orgs Over Arctic Drilling

Shell Sues Sierra Club and Other Environmental Orgs Over Arctic Drilling

NOTE: This is a guest post from Michael Brune, Executive Director of The Sierra Club. This blog post originally appeared on his blog, Coming Clean.

Royal Dutch Shell, the fifth-largest company in the world, is suing the Sierra Club along with a dozen other environmental organizations on the off chance that we might attempt to do our job. Shell is taking us to court preemptively because we might have the audacity to say that drilling in the Arctic is risky and unsafe. Even though we haven’t seen the full plans yet and haven’t taken any legal action yet, Shell wants to prevent any possible legal challenges that might delay its plans to drill for oil in the Chukchi and Beaufort Seas off the coast of Alaska this summer.

In other words, Shell wants a judge to block challenges to its drilling plans that no one’s even made yet. The real message to anyone who believes America’s Polar Bear Seas just might not be the smartest place to start drilling oil wells: Get out of the way, there’s money to be made. Never mind that we’re talking about a pristine and ecologically rich home to millions of migratory birds, seals, polar bears, whales, and walruses.

By the way, no need to feel left out if Shell isn’t suing you for caring about the Arctic – you can get in on the action right here. What’s Shell going to do — sue millions of us?

Has it really been less than two years since the Deepwater Horizon disaster in the Gulf of Mexico? Imagine dealing with an oil spill in the far more remote and extreme environment of the Arctic. Shell has a plan, of course, just like BP did. Based on the oil industry’s track record of carelessness and negligence, the whole world has a right to be skeptical.

At least Shell is upfront about its motives. It’s invested big bucks in Arctic leases — not to mention members of Congress — and wants to start seeing some payback.

Most proponents of a “drill anywhere and everywhere” policy aren’t quite so transparent. Instead, they claim that more drilling can help us achieve energy independence or, at least, lower the price of gas this summer.

Wrong on both counts. With only two percent of the world’s oil reserves, the United States could let companies like Shell extract and refine every last drop without having any significant effect on world oil prices (although Big Oil would make a bundle in the process).

Energy independence is achievable, but it’s not going to happen so long as we cling to the fantasy that we can drill our way there. Pumping oil from places like the Arctic might buy us a couple of more days or weeks or even months of oil to feed our habit, but in the process we’d also get more air and water pollution, more destruction of our precious coasts and natural areas, and a real risk of runaway climate disruption.

Meanwhile, the real solution to high oil prices is so simple that you can state it in three little words: Use less oil.

The good news is we’re already seeing how easy it can be to do exactly that.

Hybrids, EVs, and other fuel-efficient vehicles save consumers money, they save oil, and they may just have saved Detroit. U.S. auto companies are thriving once again because they’ve been given incentives to innovate. Consumers are responding, domestic auto jobs are growing, and U.S. fuel consumption is down five percent from last year.

But there’s more to be done. The Obama administration has proposed vehicle fuel-efficiency standards that will bring average mileage rates to almost 55 miles per gallon, cutting millions of barrels per day in oil consumption. Congress shouldn’t watch from the sidelines but should complement this historic effort by cutting all oil industry subsidies and doubling down on clean energy. At the same time, we need to invest aggressively in public transportation and safe walking and biking to ensure we can get to work, go to school, and do our shopping without being held hostage at the gas pump.

Use less oil. Maybe that simple concept is what has spooked Shell and prompted its ridiculous lawsuit. The U.S. is poised to break Big Oil’s stranglehold on our economy, our political system, our climate, health, and our national security. Rather than let ourselves be distracted by high gas prices, we should be even more motivated by them to get off oil — once and for all.

Read more: , , , , , ,

Photo courtesy of The Sierra Club.

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

95 comments

+ add your own
4:34PM PST on Dec 24, 2012

:(

9:54AM PDT on Jun 6, 2012

Boicottare la Shell

8:00PM PDT on Apr 13, 2012

people should boycott shell oil products and find out what else they own ,then boycott that too

5:54PM PDT on Apr 8, 2012

despicable

5:05PM PDT on Apr 7, 2012

i wonder if another company would be willing to stand up against the drilling to save the wildlife/enviroment/animals? coke/cola company (pepsi co,) they have that them with the polar bears on the coke cans and have the polar bear fund if they are really commited to helping the bears in the artic and elswhere they should be angered by the shell would they not? could coke get involved or be urged to help? they help we drink theier pop? as long as they help against shell maybe? big boy against another big boy?

7:33PM PDT on Apr 1, 2012

We all have to stick together and keep fighting, we can't let SHELL win this one. If they do it will mean a lot of destruction and many animals will have to die. We CAN'T let this happen!!!!!!!!!

6:24PM PDT on Mar 30, 2012

How about a counter-suit? Petition after petition was signed, but those rotters got in there anyway, didn't they? Big Oil always gets its way. We just don't fight hard enough.

5:58PM PDT on Mar 30, 2012

Cold blooded aren't they?....This is what I believe is what EVIL looks like...Men in their fine suits and don't give a dam about anything except their profits...These are Evil Americans who don't give a dam what happens to the planet or to the people...

7:24AM PDT on Mar 30, 2012

Anything for oil? Thank-you for sharing.

11:32PM PDT on Mar 28, 2012

There is currently no method for cleaning or controlling an oil spill in Arctic waters. Global warming has melted the Arctic ice to such an extent that the polar bear population may not survive an oil spill. Oil reduces the insulation of the bears’ fur so they use more energy to keep warm so they have to compensate by increasing caloric intake but they are already starving from the loss of Arctic ice. Polar bears ingest oil, which causes liver and kidney damage, by grooming their contaminated fur and by scavenging/ preying on contaminated seals, seabirds, or other food items. A large number polar bears would likely die if there was an oil spill in prime polar bear habitat. The extraction process can also result in discharges of a number of toxic substances such as oil-based drilling mud, which contain both heavy metals and POPs, and even naturally-occurring substances from the geological structure such as alkyphenols. Also, disturbances due to seismic blasting, construction, transportation or operation of facilities, as well as disturbances and contamination in connection with oil spill clean-up operations can negatively impact polar bears. Offshore operations pose the greatest risk, since routine emissions, spills or leaks will be discharged directly into the sea or onto the sea ice. If a major spill occurs at or near areas of polar bear denning sites, Hopen Island in the Barents Sea for example, could have population-wide consequences.

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

kathrynelizabet E., I wish I could give you a million stars for that comment! Beautifully stated!

I have Post-polio, Rotational Scoliosis, and prone to Sciatica. I've found Tylenol to be totally worthless.…

Enough is enough. Most civilized nations have dispensed with this barbarism. Does the uS really ant to…

Story idea? Want to blog? Contact the editors!
ads keep care2 free

more from causes

Animal Welfare

Causes Canada

Causes UK

Children

Civil Rights

Education

Endangered Wildlife

Environment & Wildlife

Global Development

Global Warming

Health Policy

Human Rights

LGBT rights

Politics

Real Food

Trailblazers For Good

Women's Rights




Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.