Should Teachers Carry Guns?

This week, we received the information that a student at the high school where I teach was posting messages on Facebook about feelings of depression and wanting to hurt people at the school. The administration and local police jumped into action immediately. Around the nation, many similar incidents have been reported since last Friday’s massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary School.

But is arming school staff the answer to this violence?

Friday morning, the National Rifle Association (NRA), after a week-long silence, gave its answer: their proposed solution to reduce mass shootings like the one in Newtown is to put armed guards in every school in America. “The only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun,” stated Wayne LaPierre. Incredibly he didn’t mention background checks, assault weapons, or the need to end gun trafficking.


In the last few days, several other prominent voices, including former U.S. Secretary of Education William J. Bennett and Representative Louis Gohmert, R-Texas, have argued that such incidents could be prevented if teachers and principals carried weapons. Texas Governor Rick Perry and Virginia Governor Robert McDonnell agree, while legislators in Oklahoma are planning to introduce a law that would let school staff members arm themselves.

Listening to various radio talk shows this week, I’ve heard repeatedly the notion that gun-free zones like schools should be banned because they are a target for gun-loving criminals.

I vehemently disagree. The answer to guns is not more guns.

That’s exactly what Michigan Governor Rick Snyder decided on Tuesday, when he vetoed legislation that would have allowed concealed weapons in college campuses and other places where they are currently off-limits. In a statement, Snyder said:

“While we must vigilantly protect the rights of law-abiding firearm owners, we also must ensure the right of designated public entities to exercise their best discretion in matters of safety and security,” the Republican governor said in a statement announcing the veto. “These public venues need clear legal authority to ban firearms on their premises if they see fit to do so.”

He has plenty of support: Virginia Lieutenant Governor Bill Bolling broke with his fellow Republican, Virginia Governor Robert F. McDonnell, this week by opposing the possibility of arming teachers, principals and other staff at schools.

From Education Week:

“Permitting firearms in schools—visible or concealed—enables a dangerous set of circumstances that can result in similar tragic outcomes,” American Federation of Teachers President Randi Weingarten and AFT-Michigan President David Hecker wrote to Gov. Snyder on Dec. 16. “We should be doing everything we can to reduce the possibility of any gunfire in schools, and concentrate on ways to keep all guns off school property and ensure the safety of children and school employees.”

This is a no-brainer: if someone gave me a gun to carry in my classroom, I would be a danger to myself and my students.

Right now, states have a wide variety of laws governing who can bring firearms onto school grounds, and when they can do so. 42 states and the District of Columbia prohibit even those holding concealed-weapons permits or licenses from bringing guns onto school grounds, according to a survey by the Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence.

By contrast, New Hampshire has no law “prohibiting people who are not pupils from possessing firearms in a school zone.” In Connecticut, carrying a gun on public school grounds is a felony, although exceptions may be made for security guards and law-enforcement officers.

In other words, gun legislation in general is a mess, and particularly so around schools.

But the solution is not to arm teachers and principals with guns. And there are signs that the country’s mood is changing.

Thousands of people have signed online petitions demanding stricter gun control, including this Care2 petition. President Obama has launched a Task Force to create specific recommendations for Congress on the issue of gun control by January, and Senator Diane Feinstein has pledged to introduce new gun-control legislation at the beginning of next year’s congressional session. Too bad that it took this tragedy to bring about some action.


The job of a teacher is to teach, and if school security needs to be beefed up, that’s the job of trained security officers. Teachers should not carry guns.

What do you think?

Related Care2 Coverage

6 Worst Reactions To The Newtown Massacre

It’s Never Too Soon To Discuss These 5 Ways to Curb Gun Violence

5 Things About Guns The UK Could Teach The US

Photo Credit: thinkstock


Silvestr Vetchinin

This is a propagandized NRA band aide approach that serves their motives only while avoiding the deeper issues of gun violence.

William B.
William B.3 years ago

All the morons in the USA on here wanting more guns! Are you just plain sick in the head, crazy, an imbecilic nut or what! Criminals do not kill our kids, people like you o you moron! You have the access and when you flip you stupid cork for some reason or another you grab you assault rifle, 30 round clips and go kill innocent kid, ground ups, your own family members etc.. You don’t kill criminals , the bloods, or the crypts, you kill us you scum bag and sometimes you even shoot yourself you yellow-bellied idiot and most often you piss in your pants, scared to own shadow! You gun freaks are all the same! A disgrace to America and our Constitution! Go blow you brains out!

Elliander E.
Elliander E.3 years ago

I once once at a school where a kid had a lighter that looked like a gun. Yes, he was an idiot for bringing something like that to school, but if teachers start carrying guns it's only a matter of time before a teacher with a hair trigger reflect shoots one of his/her unarmed students.

Bill Reese
Bill Reese3 years ago

More guns may not make the world a safer place, but it will also not make it a more dangerous place either. If you will look very few multiple killing are done with assault weapons. We need to keep the 2nd admendment in place and do a better job of identifying the mentally ill person.
Guns do not kill people it is people that kill people with knives, clubs, whatever is at hand. Once the guns are removed from the honest citizen then only the crooks will have guns and everyone knows that.

Janine Murray
Janine M3 years ago

It is insanity to arm teachers..Teachers should be focusing on education. Crazy how people believe the answer to reducing mass shootings is to put more guns in the system. People are so focused on their right to bear arms-but with rights come responsibilities. If Mrs Lanza had her guns securely locked in a gun safe, instead of leaving them lying around in her basement, she may still be alive today, as would the disaster at Sandy Hook have been avoided... But then why the hell did Mrs Lanza need a high powered assault weapon, automatic clips and so much ammunition?? It is time universal gun laws are applied throughout the "United" States of America...Sure bad people will still get access to guns ...why should legitimate people be"penalized" are all excuses not to make changes.BUT More guns certainly don't make this world a safer place!

Bill Reese
Bill Reese4 years ago

No one is suggesting that every teacher or administrator be given a gun to carry to school. Each teacher or administrator that wants to carry a weapon, needs to be trained, and checked out for stabilty. For instance, while I was in High School I had three teachers that were Korean War US Marine veterans. They would have been excellent people to have carry a weapon on school grounds.

We have seen several instances lately that all the gun laws in the world would not have stopped the maiming, however, if we have guns in the Citizens hands as the 2nd admendment states there is less chance of a crook using a gun to hold someone up.

Kathy Perez
Kathy Johnson4 years ago

teachers do NOT need to be carrying guns. Teachers can be as unstable as students, and more guns on the property would ultimately mean more accidents/violence

Matt B.
Matt B4 years ago

post continued

...The answer lies in addressing how we deal with criminals and psychos and of course making allowances for honest citizens to own and carry the weapons of their choice to protect themselves from those criminals and psychos that will fall through the cracks no matter what we do or don't do. In reviewing the "facts" as provided by the "authorities" and the news, I note that the police took 20 minutes to respond to the school. Clearly that puts their response time as being at least 19 minutes and 59 seconds too late. Had a teacher or staff member been armed being right there onsite when and where the problem was, perhaps there would have been fewer innocents killed and potentially none killed, instead we got anti-gun nuts such as yourself getting their way and no teacher and no staff member was armed because the school was a "gun free" zone. Tell me again how well that worked out for the kids and staff of Sandy Hook?

Matt B.
Matt B4 years ago

David C. posted "Did you notice he even knows more about the Sandy Hook shooting than do the local police and medical examiner? He clings to the early story that the rifle was left in Lanza's car. The medical examiner was quite explicit that wounds of the dead were from rifle
fire. But Matt has overruled his findings."

David not that it matters as the end result is dead kids and a number of dead adults, but what I've had to say reference technical gun details was based on the information provided by those authorites in Connecticut you now want to reference. The first, second. and third reports about the school shooting put the rifle as being found inside the killer's car not next to his dead body or somewhere else in the school where he had been, I have since followed up and see that they have changed their story and now put a shotgun in the car instead of the rifle. I don't think it is unreasonable to expect the authorities to get a simple and obvious detail like what type of gun they found and where it was recovered to be accurately reported from the get go. No matter, the killer could have used single action colt revolvers, black power firearms, or a box of 100 deringers, shooting this vicitms is shooting his victims and dead is dead. The answer to this problem is not banning guns. The answer is not attacking the rights of honest citizens who had nothing to do with this crime or any other. The answer lies in addressing how we deal with criminals and psychos and of cou

Matt B.
Matt B4 years ago

post continued

"Any single man must judge for himself whether circumstances warrant obedience or resistance to the commands of the civil magistrate; we are all qualified, entitled, and morally obliged to evaluate the conduct of our rulers. This political judgment, moreover, is not simply or primarily a right, but like self-preservation, a duty to God. As such it is a judgment that men cannot part with according to the God of Nature. It is the first and foremost of our inalienable rights without which we can preserve no other.” - John Locke