START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x
735,060 people care about Women's Rights

Talking Feminism With Gloria Steinem

Talking Feminism With Gloria Steinem

Sarah Palin may be trying to take over feminism and reacquisition it for her conservative causes, but the true leader in feminism, Gloria Steinem, will never let it go without a fight.

Steinem and Woman’s Media Center president Jehmue Greene sat down for an interview with Katie Couric last week, where they discussed the women in the workforce,

Alternet has the full transcript of the interview, and the following are a few excerpts.

On equality between the sexes in employment and homelife:

COURIC: [L]et’s talk about some of the negative statistics and why they still exist. Now this is according to the White House Project. Women account for only 18% of our top leaders in all fields. In politics – in female representation — the US has dropped to the 69th spot, behind Iraq and North Korea, which I found so shocking. In 1993 women were 12% of partners in law firms. Today it’s a whopping 18%. Only 17% of Congress is made up of women. Women make 78.7 cents for every dollar a man makes. And women earn more college degrees, as I mentioned, but hold only 16% of leadership roles in the business world, 23% in academia, and 22% in journalism. And of course the number that you mentioned are decision‐making ‐- I guess management ‐- jobs. So why these depressing statistics? What’s behind this? And why haven’t we come further if so many strides have been made?

STEINEM: Patriarchy is behind this and racism is behind this. These are really old systems so it takes quite awhile.We had a suffragist and an abolitionist movement that gained a legal identity as human beings for women of all races and men of color. That took more than 100 years. Now we’re striving for legal and social equality. That’s gonna take 100 years probably. We’re only 30 years into it. This is a long process and we’ve come an incredible distance, which we need to celebrate, but really the problem mainly is our idea of our sound bite minds that we think it’s going to happen right away. We have to do as much as we can every day and push the boundaries. But we also have to plan for our daughters and our grandsons who are also going to be feminists. We have to look forward…There’s progress but I think we’re mostly measuring progress by whether or not women are doing what men used to do. We need to also measure whether men are being nurturing parents and being truly parents, because women cannot do two full time jobs. And that is the problem of most women in this country right now — they’re working outside the home and inside the home too. And men are missing being nurturing parents. There are all kinds of wonderful studies showing that men live longer, have fewer illnesses, less depression, better sex lives, all kinds of things if they are egalitarian parents.

On reproductive health:

COURIC: Wasn’t that just an extension, though, of the Hyde Amendment which basically said no federal funds could be used…

STEINEM: No. No, it went further than the Hyde Amendment. And the Hyde Amendment should be repealed. You know, it was challenged in the Supreme Court. If there had been more women at the time on the Court we wouldn’t have the Hyde Amendment because it penalizes poor women terribly.

COURIC: Right

STEINEM: But you know I think we need to understand, if we get the politics of reproduction, we’re not so mystified by what happens. For instance sometimes on campus, students will say to me “Why are these right wing groups both against contraception and lesbians? “ Haha. Which they find bizarre. And I say but you know it’s not bizarre. It’s rational because they’re against any form of sexual expression that doesn’t end in conception or that can’t end in conception. So those are condemned by the same groups even though it may seem irrational.

On Sarah Palin:

COURIC: While we’re on the subject of reproductive rights, can you be a conservative feminist? Sarah Palin recently I think rankled some traditional feminists by calling herself a feminist, despite the fact she doesn’t espouse many traditional feminist points of view.

STEINEM: Well, we’re free to call ourselves whatever we wish. But I think her calling herself a feminist has mostly to do with how many votes Hillary Clinton got in the presidential race. Because yes, you can be a feminist who doesn’t agree with abortion, who would never have an abortion. But you can’t be a feminist who says that other women can’t and criminalizes abortion. 1 in 3 American women needs an abortion at some time in her life. To make that criminal and dangerous is not a feminist act and that is the position of Sarah Palin.

For more from Steinem and Greene, see the interview below.

Read more:

wikimedia commons

quick poll

vote now!

Loading poll...

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

96 comments

+ add your own
1:47AM PDT on Jul 27, 2010

What is better?
Better speaker, better ideas or better platform?

3:57PM PDT on Jul 26, 2010

Maybe Gloria Steinem is better

9:12PM PDT on Jul 25, 2010

sarah palin needs to hang it up & quit making an even bigger fool of herself than she already has. thank god i did'nt vote republican in that election. she is an ambitious bitch with no sense. i would would have been afraid to take a cup of coffee from her, if her running mate had been elected president. while i don't agree with gloria's stand on abortion because of my religious beliefs, she is by far the better femminist,& has done far more for women's rights than sarah could ever hope to accomplish.

5:44AM PDT on Jul 23, 2010

Thanks

12:38AM PDT on Jul 23, 2010

Thanks for the article.

1:27PM PDT on Jul 21, 2010

Johan: reacquisition is a word actually: the act of acquiring or gaining possession. And while I sort of agree with what you say, and hope women would learn to stick together and stand up for one another until we're treated more fairly and with respect...at the same time, it is the true meaning of equality to look beyond gender at the qualities within. This includes pointing out when someone is a hateful, bigoted, idiotic waste of skin, such as Sarah Palin. She is a symbol of so much that is wrong in this world, and should be NO VOICE for today's intelligent, loving, ambitious woman. The fact that she has suckered so many people into believing her lies and false charm is truly scary to me, just the same as I feel about Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, George Dubya, etc. etc....... she's a joke and an imposter / traitor to the feminist cause.

3:52AM PDT on Jul 21, 2010

The female youth today are not even thinking about rights and equality. It's all about material objects (like cellphones), gossip (celeb and local) and sex, sex, sex!

It saddens me that despite the great work done by women such as Gloria S., women are more objectified than ever before.

2:31AM PDT on Jul 21, 2010

NOTED

11:02PM PDT on Jul 20, 2010

Anita Scott laid it on the line....Palin is a joke, but some times others don't see that.
Why is a mystery to me and other???
Sarah is an attractive female with a mouth that just doesn't know when to quit.
So, just let her talk, she's actually doing her opposition a favor, flapping her mouth, on, and on and on infinitum!

Thank you Sarah ;-)

JO

10:34PM PDT on Jul 20, 2010

Why is it that women always attack other women?
Why not attack men if you are being neglected.
Stand together and do something positive but do not attack other women just because you do not like what they are sayng or what they stand for!
Incidentally, there is no such word as reacquisition. Love you all girls, so don't fight amongst yourselves!

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

ads keep care2 free

meet our writers

Colleen H. Colleen H. is an Online Campaigner with Care2 and a recent transplant to San Francisco from the East... more
Story idea? Want to blog? Contact the editors!



Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.