22,429,585 members doing good!
2,522,373 people care about Animal Welfare



Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.

Teen Boys Face Felony Charges For Drowning Newborn Kittens

Teen Boys Face Felony Charges For Drowning Newborn Kittens

Two newborn kittens lived in this world for only 48 hours, but their presence is making history in Nevada. The siblings were stolen from their mother by two 16-year-old boys who cruelly drowned them in a cup of water. In the first case of its kind, the teens were charged with felony animal cruelty and will be tried under a new stricter law enacted in 2011.

The sad crime would have gone unnoticed if Christine Ohm hadn’t heard animals crying and boys laughing in her neighbor’s yard, while she was cleaning her pool. She ran and got a ladder and looked over the fence.

“I saw they had drowned one kitten in a cup of water,” said Ohm. “The other was in the water and dead, but the boys were still holding it down.” The teens used a barbecue utensil to keep the kittens underwater.

Horrified at what she saw, Ohm took pictures of the scene with her phone and called Las Vegas police for help. The boys were charged with felony cruelty and are being held in custody.

The teens, whose names are being withheld because they are juveniles, are the first people in the state to face felony animal cruelty charges for a first offense since a stricter law was enacted in 2011. Cooney’s Law was passed to protect animals after a beagle was brutally mutilated by its owner. Prior to the law, a person had to commit three acts of animal abuse before being charged with a felony crime.

Thomas Ericsson, one of the teenager’s lawyers argued in court, “As I’m sure you’re aware, Las Vegas euthanizes thousands and thousands and thousands of feral and pet cats because people aren’t spaying and neutering them. I’m not justifying the conduct, but this wasn’t violence against other people; it was inappropriate conduct involving the animals.”

The judge didn’t buy the argument, calling it “outright cruelty.” The charges send a strong message that times have changed in Nevada and animal abuse will not be tolerated.

 

Related Stories:

Veteran Fights To Adopt Diego, His Bomb Sniffing Army Dog

700 Hoarded Animals Safe, But What About The Next 700?

Death Of 6 Kittens Brings Community Together

Read more: , , , , ,

Photo Credit: fauxto_digit

quick poll

vote now!

Loading poll...

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

share story:

BONUS butterfly credits

533 comments

+ add your own
4:15AM PDT on May 25, 2013

What kind of parents do these sub humans have?

2:54AM PDT on May 24, 2013

They are sick people. I cannot imagine what they would be able to do in the future with other animals and persons! Let them in jail please!

8:46PM PDT on May 20, 2013

Did they serve some time in jail? Does anybody know it?

8:11PM PDT on May 18, 2013

It has to stop, somewhere

8:59AM PDT on May 18, 2013

fyi: serial killers often display their violent tendencies by harming animals, killing animals before proceeding to harming/killing humans ... Look back at the history of many serial killers and you will discover that they harmed animals first.....

2:13PM PDT on May 17, 2013

psychopath

7:55AM PDT on May 15, 2013

Sure, animals are not human beings, but they are living beings. Animals suffer like people. Drowning these poor kittens is as cruel as drowning a baby or a grown-up for me. Human victim or animal victim, the punishments should be the same.

6:07AM PDT on May 15, 2013

I think there is a difference in what constitutes "commonplace" behaviours in order to "get rid of" unwanted animals IN TIMES PAST and what is considered ethically and morally okay in today's society. One has to think that these boys have grown up not being taught to respect and care for animals - and that presumably has arisen from their own family or community. BTW, the lawyer in question was just doing his job - regardless of whether we agree with him. He might not have liked what the boys did, but they have a right to representation. Fortunately, the judge tossed out his "argument"!

4:50AM PDT on May 15, 2013

The attorney is a moron. This is rightfully a felony, and he had a lot of nerve trying to downplay the actions as just 'inappropriate'. These little bastard shitbags are teens. They are old enough to know right from wrong. Anyone over the age of three should have been taught already that it is unacceptable to hurt animals or other humans.

3:49PM PDT on May 14, 2013

YES !!! Finally an intelligent & morally sound decision. I pray that the IDIOTIC attorney is denied any appeal requests.

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

ads keep care2 free
Story idea? Want to blog? Contact the editors!

customize your newsletter

This newsletter will be sent daily and will feature updates on all the causes you care about. Which causes would you like to include?

Copyright © 2013 Care2.com, inc. and its licensors. All rights reserved