START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x
912,408 people care about Women's Rights

Thanks to Sexism, We’ll Likely Have an Incompetent Man Lead the Economy

Thanks to Sexism, We’ll Likely Have an Incompetent Man Lead the Economy

A misogynist man who has played a big role in running our economy into the ground is maneuvering to block a talented, experienced woman from taking charge at the Federal Reserve and grab the job for himself.

Larry Summers was drummed out of his office as Harvard University’s president for blatant sexism. In 2005, he announced that women are underrepresented in academic math and science departments because they aren’t as good at those disciplines as men are. Within a year he succumbed to faculty pressure and resigned.

Summers popped up later in Washington, D.C., where he had previously served as Treasury Secretary in the Clinton administration. Under Obama, he was handed high-level government positions that allowed him to influence policy decisions about the economy. Smart though he may be, he sucked at these jobs.

Now it appears that Summers is a strong candidate to replace Ben Bernanke as Chairman of the Federal Reserve. According to the Wall St. Journal, the Fed Chair is the most important economic official in the world.

Summers has the support of another former Treasury Secretary, Robert Rubin, and a number of his male proteges, all of whom have gone from jobs in the government to Citigroup and back again. Not coincidentally, as Fed Chair, Summers would primarily control how the government regulates Citigroup and the other “too big to fail” banking behemoths.

Meanwhile, a woman who through some genetic fluke can actually do math, has been holding down the Fed’s number two spot, learning everything she needs to know to strengthen the U.S. economy. Paul Krugman wrote at the New York Times that, according to the Wall St. Journal, Janet Yellen has “been a highly successful team player at the Fed, has a distinguished record as a research economist on the very issues she would have to deal with as chair, and, according to a recent assessment, has the best forecasting track record of 14 top Fed policymakers.”

The New York Times editorial board agreed. “No one else can match Janet Yellen’s combination of academic credentials and policy-making experience. And no one ever confirmed to the job has come to it with as deep a grounding in both the theory and practice of monetary and regulatory policy as Ms. Yellen would bring.” No one, most definitely including Larry Summers.

So why is Summers being considered instead of Yellen? Because she’s female, and because Summers would protect the banks’ interests over the public’s.

First the sexist part. David Dayen at Salon explains the chauvinistic movement against Yellen:

Summers would get the nod over the previous favorite, Fed vice chair Janet Yellen, in part because top-level officials have stressed to the president that Yellen is somehow “not strong enough” for the job, and would subsequently lack the confidence of financial markets. This gender-coded whisper campaign against the woman who would become the first female Fed chair in history is in line with an undercurrent of sexism about the selection.

Dayen adds that Summers’ backers have branded him “as a ‘more aggressive’ alternative to Yellen, with all the gender-based overtones that carries.” In contrast, Yellen is seen as a “dove.”

The New York Sun opined that if Yellen gets the top Fed post, it will represent the ascendancy of the “gender-backed dollar.” Apparently the dollar is inherently male, and letting a woman get her hands on it would make it all girly. Heaven forfend.

On to the second part — why Summers shouldn’t be in public office at all. The ugly truth is that he isn’t aggressive or strong or remotely trustworthy to perform this job in the public interest. Dayen writes that “on financial regulation, Larry Summers has perhaps the worst track record of any major economic figure in America. And the Federal Reserve plays a key role, perhaps the primary role, in regulating banks [for instance, his buddy Citigroup]… In short, if we wanted to pin the crisis on one person, Summers would be a viable candidate.”

As Salon summarized the matter, “Larry Summers will destroy the economy (again)” if he is appointed to chair the Federal Reserve.

So we have, on the one hand, a male corporate toady with responsibility for our economic crisis, and on the other, a woman who is the most qualified person in the nation for the job. Which one do pundits believe is in the lead? Yep, it’s the man.

I can think of only one advantage of Summers getting control of the Fed: it would give the lie to his idiot argument that few women are among the top mathematicians because they can’t do math, and help prove instead that the sexist glass ceiling is the better explanation for the inequality. Somehow, though, that just isn’t worth it.

Tell Obama to nominate Yellen for Federal Reserve Chairman and not Summers.

Read more: , , , , ,

Photo credit: Brand X Pictures/Thinkstock

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

90 comments

+ add your own
5:35PM PDT on Aug 11, 2013

Incompetent white men are the norm? It explains a lot, doesn't it?

3:36AM PDT on Aug 4, 2013

Thanks for sharing.

6:38AM PDT on Aug 3, 2013

@Kay M. "She will look out for the consumer and not the BIG BANKS, Summers is in the banks pocket already, and he will drive us back into recession if not worse.......period,"

Really? She already works for the banker's bank. There is nothing about the FED that looks out for anyone other than the BIG BANKS.

@Connie C. I agree, our only hope is to Audit the FED which is held up in the Senate so it can be exposed and eventually ended.

@GGma Sheila D. Um don't you realize that the existence of the FED is in direct conflict with our freedoms?

@John S. Please stop feeding the Democrat vs. Republican nonsense. Both sides support the FED stealing from the people so they can avoid raising taxes or borrowing money.

6:31AM PDT on Aug 3, 2013

I'm all for hiring the best person for the job regardless of gender or skin color. The chairman of the FED is arguably more powerful than the President.

Well if Yellen has Bernanke's cheerleader Krugman's support then we should all be very skeptical of her; we do not need a FED team player at the helm.

Would it really make a difference? Would either one be able to steer the Titanic around and avoid the coming economic collapse? We should be focusing on how to save America from economic collapse and not who is going to be at the helm when it crashes.


5:19AM PDT on Aug 3, 2013

thank you for the article and the over 85 comments from the care 2 members, I was happy to sign the petition to not nominate Summers, and to please nominate Janet, She will look out for the consumer and not the BIG BANKS, Summers is in the banks pocket already, and he will drive us back into recession if not worse.......period,

11:27PM PDT on Aug 2, 2013

He, along with his friend/former CEO Robert Rubin, engineered the end of the Glass-Stegall Act which separated the commercial banks and brokerage houses from dipping in the same pot. The result is the current Second Depression (and it is, indeed, a depression) we have been going through fro the last six years with no signs of letting up any time soon. Summers's appointment would simply prove the system is rotten and corrupt at its very core. There is no amount of reform, even appointing a competent woman that could save the credibility of the Federal Reserve. It has never been held fully accountable for the current crisis, it has never been subjected to any independent audit, and there is little regular oversight of its activities. The Federal Reserve is a private corporation created in 1913 which lends money to the government at interest. The existence of the Federal Reserve is in direct violation of Article 1, Section 8, Clause 5, which reserves exclusive power to create money to the government.
Larry Summers is a part of the cancer that the US government has become, so it would not be a surprise if he is appointed to become Federal REServe chair; it woud complete the circle, as it were, and the US economy will simply go into complete freefall.

10:15PM PDT on Aug 2, 2013

Signed- We are so screwed

10:05PM PDT on Aug 2, 2013

I was surprised when I first heard of his possible appointment -- but lately NOTHING surprises me !

1:41PM PDT on Aug 2, 2013

Signed and commented....Electing Yellen as Ferderal Reserve Chairman will send a clear cut message that this Presidency will not accept anyone woh is blatantly sexist. By electing Yellen this Presidency als send the clear message it will not accept anyone who wants to dismantle We, the People's Freedoms. Please. Thank you.

8:48AM PDT on Aug 2, 2013

Thanks.

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

@Charmaigne C "It should however, be pointed out that many religious centers of education and religious…

Surely David F. is simply playing the devil's advocate here...Nobody can be THAT stupid without malicious…

Story idea? Want to blog? Contact the editors!
ads keep care2 free



Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.