START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x
926,864 people care about Women's Rights

The Biggest Foreign Policy Difference That Won’t Come Up in the Debate

The Biggest Foreign Policy Difference That Won’t Come Up in the Debate

The third and final presidential debate will focus on foreign policy, and we can be all but certain the issue of international family planning and the global gag rule will not come up. That’s despite the fact that the outcome of this election will decide the fate of millions of women abroad.

Republican nominee Mitt Romney and his running mate Paul Ryan promised that, on their first day in the White House, they would reinstate the “global gag rule,” a spiteful restriction used to deny federal money for family-planning work abroad to any organization that provides information, advice, referrals or services for legal abortion or supported the legalization of abortion, even if that organization used its own money to do so. The mere mention of abortion by any group that provides health care to the world’s poorest and most vulnerable women would not only cost them federal money used to support those broad health care services, but technical support in the way of supplies of contraceptives.

The gag rule was imposed by the last three Republican presidents, beginning with Ronald Reagan in 1984. Both President Bill Clinton and President Barack Obama rescinded the rule once inaugurated.

Romney has also vowed to reinstate another anti-woman policy adored by conservatives. Romney promised to block the United States from contributing to the United Nations Population Fund. The fund supports programs in approximately 150 countries to improve poor women’s reproductive health, reduce infant mortality, end sexual trafficking of women and girls and prevent the spread of HIV.

U.S. contribution to the fund has already decreased approximately $20 million to $35 million annually. Overall support of international family planning and reproductive health programs stands at $610 million, a mere drop in the bucket compared to the need of the world’s most vulnerable. And as we’ve seen time and time again, investing in women’s health and opportunity lifts up communities, especially in the developing world. Educating girls, providing women access to land ownership and giving these girls and women the ability to control their destinies is the way to peace and prosperity. Sadly, that’s a vision that simply can’t compete with the war-hungry defense industry.

Related Stories:

Gag Me: Stop A Global Reproductive Health Disaster

House Republicans Vote To Reinstate Global Gag Rule

Congress’ War on Women: Global Edition

Read more: , , , ,

Photo from mckaysavage via flickr.

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

49 comments

+ add your own
2:28AM PDT on Oct 28, 2012

for sure, they won't want to lose voters that way. nationalism is strong and the welfare of society is deemed the more important ones to talk about.

9:58PM PDT on Oct 24, 2012

Danielle said it for me. Like all the social programs, it's what politicians attack because the arms manufacturers are to powerful to go up against. There's been a lot of graphics put out on the net showing how much of our tax monies goes to "defense". Mind blowing! But fear sells all kinds of things and one of them is a seat in the political arena.

12:09PM PDT on Oct 24, 2012

noted

11:43AM PDT on Oct 24, 2012

Thanks for information !!

10:30AM PDT on Oct 24, 2012

Thanks for the post. I don't understand why anyone would vote for Romney. He's basically neglecting help to half the world's population, women.

7:27PM PDT on Oct 23, 2012

thanks

12:21PM PDT on Oct 23, 2012

noted

11:39AM PDT on Oct 23, 2012

Foreign policy MUST include education and the lifting of the yolk of oppression on women WORLDWIDE! Half of the population of this entire planet is treated like shit on a boot, dirty and underfoot. ALL women of the world need to stand up and be counted. The backward men in this world would shit their pants. (Note, the BACKWARD men, not all men) Why do you think the Taliban shoots a 15 year old girl? THEY ARE AFRAID OF HER! Not unlike the KKK lynching black folks in the South in the past. What if black folks get education and power? We can't label them inferior and stupid and enslave them any more! Can't have that now can we?
Paul, humanitarian aid would be available both at home and abroad to the benefit of all INCLUDING the US if the US would quit spending billions daily on wars that only oppress the poorest of the poor and women even more.

9:27AM PDT on Oct 23, 2012

noted.

8:14AM PDT on Oct 23, 2012

Romney is actually correct on this although it is hypocritical of him to take that same money to attempt to bribe some overseas dictator to do what we want. Federal government has no right taking our money and spreading it around the world as they please. Where does "federal money" come from in the first place? As for the subject in this article, this should be left to private charities, not government. And anything that the UN is involved in is suspect. Leave it to Jessica to turn this into a promotion for her narrow groupthink mentality.

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

ads keep care2 free

meet our writers

Beth Buczynski Beth is a freelance writer and editor living in the Rocky Mountain West. So far, Beth has lived in... more
Story idea? Want to blog? Contact the editors!
ads keep care2 free

more from causes

Animal Welfare

Causes Canada

Causes UK

Children

Civil Rights

Education

Endangered Wildlife

Environment & Wildlife

Global Development

Global Warming

Health Policy

Human Rights

LGBT rights

Politics

Real Food

Trailblazers For Good

Women's Rights




Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.