START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x
2,577,105 people care about Environment & Wildlife

The Bottom Line: Making U.S. Fisheries Work for Us

The Bottom Line: Making U.S. Fisheries Work for Us

Note: This is a guest post from Lee Crockett, Director of U.S. Fisheries Campaigns at the Pew Environment Group.

One of our democracy’s core beliefs is that nations make better decisions when citizens are informed and engaged. In this spirit, the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (MSA), like many other landmark laws that govern our natural resources, places particular importance on public involvement in the management of America’s marine fisheries. Under the MSA, regional management councils — which are tasked with making recommendations to the secretary of commerce regarding the management of marine fisheries — are composed of people from local communities, meetings are open to everyone and public testimony is a valued part of the decision-making process.

The MSA’s tradition of openness and public input is at odds with a proposed “data confidentiality” rule from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA) National Marine Fisheries Service that could revise federal guidelines on the release of fishing data. Rather than enhancing public participation, NOAA’s proposed rule would severely restrict public access to important information needed to ensure that valuable marine resources are being managed sustainably.

U.S. ocean fish populations are a multibillion-dollar public resource, supporting hundreds of thousands of jobs in the recreational and commercial fishing industries, and playing an essential role in the health of coastal ecosystems. Every year, NOAA invests millions of taxpayer dollars in data collection on commercial fishing vessels by professional observers, who record what fish are caught, where they are caught, and how fishing gear may damage other ocean wildlife. This information is essential to citizens’ understanding of the impacts of fishing. It also enables us to participate effectively in management decisions to help ensure wise care of our marine wildlife and ecosystems.

Under NOAA’s proposed rule, members of the public could be required to ask permission from private fishing permit holders (who have a direct financial stake in the issue) to access information about their fishing activities and its impacts on ocean wildlife, even though taxpayer funds support efforts to collect observer data on our $5.3 billion commercial ocean fisheries. And the rule would allow the information to be provided in an aggregated form that if aggregated into too large a geographic area, for example, would disguise specific impacts on ocean resources.

Americans have a right to know how NOAA proposes to provide data and whether it will be presented in a format that’s easily understandable and that facilitates public participation in the protection of our ocean fish. As someone who has helped write rules at NOAA, I know how hard it is to craft balanced proposals. I believe this rule, as currently drafted, not only could seriously undermine the public’s trust in fishery management decisions, but also reduce the quality of those decisions by excluding key stakeholders.

Our nation’s marine resources are best managed when fishermen, nongovernmental organizations, scientists, and the general public can access the same data and work together for the common good. NOAA should withdraw this flawed proposal and work to create one that will improve public access to fisheries information so that our oceans can be managed effectively.

Related Stories:

The Bottom Line: Historic Moment for Most Important Fish in America

The Bottom Line: A Solution to Protect Threatened Tuna

The Bottom Line: Even Fish Need Yearly Check-Ups

Read more: , , , , , , , , , ,

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

36 comments

+ add your own
4:08PM PDT on Oct 28, 2012

thanks for sharing

6:17AM PDT on Oct 23, 2012

Fisheries are part of the commons. The commons is public. Anything done in the commons is done in public and should not have any expectation of privacy.

3:18AM PDT on Oct 22, 2012

Every picture tells a story, don't it ? Thanks good article

3:20PM PDT on Oct 21, 2012

as far as NOAA goes, if there's nothing to hide, there's no reason to restrict access to information.

...as far as fishermen "never giving back" - sorry, beg to differ. we small family fishermen work ceaselessly to improve the quality of the ocean and its denizens, for a variety of reasons, including gratitude for what the sea provides us, and the fact that we are quite aware - as those who do not work on and with the ocean may not be - how fragile it is, and we have a far greater stake in preserving and maintaining it than those who simply find it majestic from a distance.

5:00AM PDT on Oct 21, 2012

Thank you.

4:37AM PDT on Oct 21, 2012

Noted, thanks.

5:20PM PDT on Oct 20, 2012

Overfishing can't continue! Thank you.

3:19PM PDT on Oct 20, 2012

Natural resources, what natural resources? Fish aren't 'resources'. They are living beings capable of running their own lives. Not being killed for human greed.

3:07PM PDT on Oct 20, 2012

Thanks for providing the post by Mr. Crockett. He is absolutely right, NOAA should withdraw their proposal and submit a better one so we as citizens can access the information.

3:05PM PDT on Oct 20, 2012

Thank you for a well-written article.

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

I, personally, think this might be a very good idea. I also agree that they should be disbursed throughout…

It sounds like a good idea to me. However, they are going to charge rent and I understand that but, will…

Time will tell. Personally, with the "sport" driven by corporate profit motives and thugism as entertainment,…

Story idea? Want to blog? Contact the editors!
ads keep care2 free



Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.