START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x

The Clock’s A-Tickin’ for Climate Change Legislation

The Clock’s A-Tickin’ for Climate Change Legislation

Seven months out from the midterms, electoral anxieties are hampering potential climate change legislation. Election years are a time to pass easy, politically popular policies, and climate change legislation does not fit that bill. For the Senate’s climate change legislation to have a chance, Congress has to sweep through the financial overhaul faster than any bill in its history. Otherwise, politicians’ focus will shift to the midterms before they pass a climate bill.

The next international climate negotiations are just weeks after the November midterms, and failure to pass a bill now means that the United States could show up once again without a solid platform from which to negotiate. After working on climate legislation for over a year, leaders on the Hill and in the executive branch are getting nervous.

At this point, any climate legislation that reaches the president’s desk will have far less impact than advocates once hoped, but Congress can still pass a bill that moves the country forward on this issue.

Tick tock

Sens. John Kerry (D-MA), Lindsay Graham (R-SC), and Joe Lieberman (I-CT) are working on a bill. On Thursday, Sen. Graham half-promised it would come a couple of weeks after Congress’ spring recess. That’s not the end of the process, though, as Kate Sheppard reports for Mother Jones. The Environmental Protection Agency will also take a crack at the bill and weigh in on its cost and overall environmental benefits.

That process could take a month and a half, Sheppard says, and on Capitol Hill, Democrats are getting antsy. “If the legislation isn’t ready to go to the floor by Memorial Day, it probably won’t make it there at all this year,” Sheppard writes.

Connie Hedegaard, the outgoing Danish Minister of Climate and Energy who hosted this year’s international climate negotiations at Copenhagen, also noticed the unease in a series of meetings with environmental leaders ranging from Todd Stern, the U.S. Special Envoy for Climate Change, to Carol Browner, head of the White House Climate and Energy Office. Hedegaard told Inter Press Service (IPS) that “she got the sense that they are not sure ‘what will fly and what will not fly or when’ with regards to U.S. climate legislation.”

“I definitely get the feeling that if [the legislation] fails this time then it would not come until after the midterm elections,” Hedegaard said.

That means the U.S. would go to the next round of international negotiations empty handed. As IPS notes, midterm elections “take place Nov. 2. The Cancun climate conference starts Nov. 29.”

Energy reduction is key

As far as anyone can tell, the Kerry-Graham-Lieberman bill is not going to do a great job limiting carbon emissions. Don’t expect that to change between now and May, or whenever the bill comes to a vote. In the absence of a real cap on carbon, Grist’s David Roberts has some advice for the trio of senators on what they can do:

“The main goal with your bill should be to establish a framework whereby a carbon price is implemented and steadily raised. The initial price can be low — low enough to avoid the kind of political backlash that has poisoned previous efforts — and phase in over time so affected industries have time to prepare … In exchange for reducing the role of carbon pricing, you should push to strengthen and expand the clean energy and efficiency provisions in your bill.”

In other words, the bill can avoid the politically treacherous cap-and-trade system, as long as it pushes through strong policies for programs like energy efficient appliances, home insulation, and other actions that reduce the amount of energy we’re using.

Who watches the watchmen?

Climate legislation, even in weakened form, is still on the table, so the amount of finger-pointing over its difficulties has been limited so far. But in The Nation a few weeks back, Johann Hari threw a stink bomb at big environmental groups, arguing that their increasing coziness with the corporate world had checked their political strength and led them to advocate for milquetoast environmental policies.

This week, the magazine published responses from the groups profiled, who called the story “plump with distortions of reality” and “a toxic mixture of inaccurate information and uninformed analysis.”

The responses are worth a read, as is Hari’s original article. In his rebuttal, Hari asks the critics to point out specific inaccuracies in his story and worries at the defensiveness of the environmental community. “Do none of these people feel any concern that the leading environmental groups in America are hoovering up cash from the worst polluters and advocating policies that fall far short of what scientists say we need to safely survive the climate crisis?” he writes.

Local action for green jobs

If big environmental groups are not as perfect as one might hope, more local environmental efforts can still make an impact, albeit on a different scale. Chris Rabb and Colorlines profile three grassroots efforts to create green jobs in three corners of the country. In Los Angeles, solar panels went up on roofs; in New York, more low income communities won access to public transportation; and in Arizona, a Navajo group formed to advocate for more green jobs in their community.

“We need all kinds of solutions–local, state, and national–and as we’ve seen the people need to make it happen,” says Rabb.

This post features links to the best independent, progressive reporting about the environment by members of The Media Consortium. It is free to reprint.

Read more: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

photo credit: thanks to laffy4k via flickr for the pic
By Sarah Laskow, Media Consortium blogger

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

46 comments

+ add your own
10:29PM PDT on Oct 22, 2013

Still ticking, thank you.

10:28PM PDT on Oct 22, 2013

Still ticking, thank you.

10:28PM PDT on Oct 22, 2013

Still ticking, thank you.

10:27PM PDT on Oct 22, 2013

Still ticking, thank you.

3:20AM PDT on Jun 28, 2010

Thanks

1:48AM PDT on Apr 16, 2010

Global temperatures and atmospheric Carbon Dioxide in a geologic timescale
We find out, the CO2 content in Atmosphere fluctuates strongly. Whereas Temperature remains quite constant.
There also is no historic evidence for thesis, Carbon Dioxide would impact climate...
http://www.geocraft.com/WVFossils/Carboniferous_climate.html
Veritas vos liberabit
Naturheilt

3:35AM PDT on Apr 2, 2010

Quite apart from climate effects, CO2 we add to the biosphere from burning hydrocarbons acidifies ocean water, which dissolves calcium carbonate, a material that sea creatures make their shells from. Some of those creatures are vital links in the aquatic food chain. If they suffer, all ocean life suffers. If all ocean life suffers, land life suffers too.

atomic alarm clock

2:08AM PDT on Apr 2, 2010

thanks

11:25PM PDT on Apr 1, 2010

I learned in Environmental Science class that 95% percent of pollution comes from industries which means 5% or less is caused by individuals. If everyone used solar power in their homes we would still be destroying our environment due to industrial practices. Did you know that irrigation is a major cause of water pollution?! That's right, farming! The real change which is needed must come from the government level! Someone has to tell big businesses what they can and cannot do because God knows if we wait for them to change on their own the Earth will be uninhabitable in record time!

5:57PM PDT on Apr 1, 2010

MERCI Nicole! If our taxes help promote 'greenness' then ALLONS Y!

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

Recent Comments from Causes

I'm with Natasha on this. How are these findings found?? By cats and kittens being tortured in test facilities.…

Stop dog racing immediately!!!! Stop torturing innocent dogs!!! Throw each of these trainers &…

meet our writers

Julie M. Rodriguez Julie M. Rodriguez is an arts, green living, and political writer based in San Mateo, CA. Her work... more
Story idea? Want to blog? Contact the editors!
ads keep care2 free

more from causes

Animal Welfare

Causes Canada

Causes UK

Children

Civil Rights

Education

Endangered Wildlife

Environment & Wildlife

Global Development

Global Warming

Health Policy

Human Rights

LGBT rights

Politics

Real Food

Trailblazers For Good

Women's Rights




Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.