Care2 will go offline for site maintenance July 31 at 9pm PST.
START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x

The Environmental Movement Doesn’t Resemble the Obama Coalition

The Environmental Movement Doesn’t Resemble the Obama Coalition

Written by Jason Mark

Last week Earth Island Institute hosted a discussion here at the David Brower Center in Berkeley to explore what the results of the 2012 election will mean for the environmental movement. I had the pleasure of moderating the evening’s conversation with a rock star cast of California Assemblywoman Nancy Skinner, former Clinton-era EPA official and the former Western Director of the NRDC, Felicia Marcus, and Michael Marx, a veteran corporate accountability activist who now leads the Sierra Club’s Beyond Oil campaign.

Portions of the conversation were expected. Everyone agreed that Barack Obama’s re-election, the Democratic gains in the US Senate, and the significant Democratic wins in the California legislature will prevent any rollbacks of major environmental laws. We won’t have to play defense, and that’s a relief. At the same time, everyone agreed that Democratic wins don’t mean we’re headed for Ecotopia. The Democrats are unreliable allies, at best, and environmental advocates and organizations will have to keep pushing for laws and policies that protect public health, our air, our water, our wild places, and the planet’s atmosphere to see any forward motion.

“We have to be smart about picking issues,” Assemblywoman Skinner said. When asked what that means, the three environmental veterans agreed that the best chances for defending the environment will come through the (California and federal) executive branches’ existing regulatory powers. “Anything we could get out of this Congress wouldn’t be good,” the Sierra Club’s Michael Marx said. So progress will have to come from federal and state agencies enforcing their existing powers to the best of their ability. This could mean new rules on CO2 emissions, new rules on chemical disclosure, and tighter prohibitions about extractive industries on public lands.

The real electricity of the night came when Assemblywoman Skinner spoke with passion about what should be obvious, but so far seems to have gone unmentioned by the eco-commentariat: The fact that the environmental movement bears very little resemblance to the coalition of voters who kept President Obama in the White House.

“The president was re-elected with strong support from African-Americans, Latinos, women, and young people,” Skinner said. “And the environmental movement, at least its leadership, remains mostly old white guys.”

Environmental movement, make a note-to-self: When we look more like a Romney-Ryan election night gathering than an Obama-Biden election night gathering, we’re in trouble.

That might be overstating things a bit — but not by much. Yes, the environmental movement is plenty youthful, with youth-led or youth-dominated groups like Energy Action and 350.org spearheading the effort to stem climate change. And, just like in much of the progressive NGO sector, women are in key leadership roles in many environmental outfits. (Rebecca Tarbotton of Rainforest Action Network and Frances Beinecke from NRDC come to mind, as does the estimable Betsy Taylor of Breakthrough Strategies.)

But all of those individuals and all of those organizations share something in common: They’re rather pale.

This isn’t news, of course. The unbearable whiteness of the green movement was called out publicly for the first time at least 20 years ago, when Dr. Robert Bullard and others noted how environmental groups had neglected issues of environmental racism and injustice. Since then, some important progress toward alliance-building and solidarity have been made. The “Big Green” groups appear to have internalized the idea that a healthy environment is a human rights issue. National civil rights organizations understand how pollution and environmental destruction can harm their constituencies. (Just see this NAACP report on coal published last week.) And there are a constellation of organizations and individuals — Green for All, Urban Habitat, Little Village Environmental Justice Organization, Communities for a Better Environment, Van Jones, Carl Anthony, Majora Carter, Will Allen (to name just a very few) — for whom there isn’t a division between caring about civil rights and human rights and caring about the environment. Or, as Bullard likes to say: “If you drink water, you’re an environmentalist. If you breathe air, you’re an environmentalist. If you eat food, you’re an environmentalist.”

Still, despite this progress, I think it’s fair to say that most Americans perceive environmentalism to be a white thing. Backcountry camping, buying organic food, and going to climate change protests remain “Stuff White People Like.”

I can’t say I have any mind-blowing prescriptions for resolving this. At least, nothing beyond what’s already been said a million times already: The need for enviros to listen more and talk less; the importance of reducing self-righteousness and self-importance in favor of meeting people where they are at with humor and patience; the necessity of demonstrating how a healthy environment can truly lift all boats; the value of ecological education programs that expose kids of color (and all kids) to wild places; the virtue of real solidarity in place of on-again, off-again recruitment.

No, all I’ve got to offer is a long, hard look in the mirror — and with it the recognition that our environmental movement resembles the America of the past more than it does the America of the future.

This post was originally published by the Earth Island Journal.

 

Related Stories:

The Browner The Neighborhood, The Browner the Air

Van Jones Paints the Economy Green

90% of Latinos Believe Environmental Conservation is Critical

 

Read more: , , , ,

Photo: tarsandsaction/flickr

quick poll

vote now!

Loading poll...

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

80 comments

+ add your own
8:03AM PST on Jan 3, 2013

Disgusting anti-white racism and a level of smugness from the liberal crowd that is truly breathtaking.

12:18PM PST on Dec 16, 2012

thanks for sharing :)

3:47AM PST on Dec 7, 2012

If your environment is gone then everything else fails, what interest then in education, unemployment, economics whatever.

9:16PM PST on Dec 6, 2012

Has everyone seen what this absolute POS idiot did?

Climate Skeptic Sen. Inhofe Makes Surprise Appearance at COP18
http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2012/12/06-12

9:00PM PST on Dec 6, 2012

Our species does not have anymore time. This planet is dying. Economics, religion, culture, social institutions & other human constructs are not the true reality. We are a delusional species. This time we cannot "fix it." Trouble is, we will take a lot of beautiful life down with us.

A great bumper sticker we saw: "You can't make a living on a dead planet." This arrogant human species will soon find this out.

5:15PM PST on Dec 5, 2012

Partial apologies, Betty, if we don't live in the same country. I'm in the USA.

5:12PM PST on Dec 5, 2012

Um, Betty, NO, the environment is *not* the most important issue facing our present government. It's the economy, the lack of jobs, and our massive national debt. I'm certainly not going to say "the environment can wait," but let's be clear on the priorities of most Americans around the dinner table.

3:24PM PST on Dec 5, 2012

We must keep watch on ALEC http://billmoyers.com/episode/encore-united-states-of-alec/
The sneaky corporations have learned to lobby our State Representatives and are making the laws. This is a must see as they are taking One State at a Time to get what they want.

7:23AM PST on Dec 5, 2012

What a cowardly article. Why not tell it like you really wanted to. Looking at the photo and also looking at the demograph of most of the people protesting for environmental type causes are......white, and a higher percentage of these people are women. If this was an article about republicans, 3 months ago, you're Care2 team would not have pulled any punches.

6:51AM PST on Dec 5, 2012

To anyone with money to contribute to help prevent this prospective environmental and democratic disaster from occurring, I have just got this email:

Defeat the planet-killing trade deal‏

Dear friends,



A secret deal could allow China’s energy companies to take over an enormous toxic oil reserve with devastating consequences for the planet. A lawsuit is our big chance to stop it. Click to chip in and Avaaz will only process your donation if we raise enough money to make this important case happen :

Pledge now
Right now, the tar sands, a toxic oil reserve almost the size of Saudi Arabia's but over 3 times as dangerous for climate change, sits landlocked in Northern Canada. People power has twice blocked new pipelines into this poison, but now we have a bigger challenge.

A new trade deal, negotiated in secret with China, could allow China's companies to take over the tar sands and sue the Canadian government if it hampers their exploitation with environmental or health laws. Canada's right-wing Prime Minister is an oil-man with a history of climate-denial, and he's using this tactic to bypass democracy, with potentially devastating consequences for the planet.

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

Humans are really good at one thing and that is killing everything in sight .What a sad legacy .

Help Out! Sign this FREE Petition to secure the artic a key to our worlds safety! http://www.sav…

meet our writers

Kathleen J. Kathleen is currently the Activism Coordinator at Care2. more
Story idea? Want to blog? Contact the editors!
ads keep care2 free



Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.