START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x
2,489,754 people care about Environment & Wildlife

The Fight is Still On to Protect Whales from the Navy’s Deadly Sonar

The Fight is Still On to Protect Whales from the Navy’s Deadly Sonar

This week, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) approved the Navy’s five-year plan to expand its sonar and live-fire training exercises in the Pacific ocean, but environmentalists are challenging the decision because of the threat it poses to marine life.

It’s been well established that marine mammals rely on hearing to navigate, communicate, feed and survive, and while there may be some dispute about how much damage the use of sonar causes, it and live-fire activities have been linked to mass whale strandings and deaths, in addition to causing stress, injuries and behavioral changes in other marine species.

“The whales and dolphins who wind up in the middle of the war games don’t stand a chance against the Navy. This proposal increases the predicted harm to marine mammals by more than 10 times. The Fisheries Service needs to do better to protect our oceans by preventing harm to the animals that call those oceans home,” said Miyoko Sakashita, oceans director at the Center for Biological Diversity.

The Navy insists that these training exercises are vital for preparing soldiers and requested authorization under the Marine Mammal Protection Act to carry out activities because the sounds generated by sonar and explosives may “affect the behavior of some marine mammals, cause a temporary loss of their hearing sensitivity or other injury.”

It has made a few promises that are supposed to limit the threats, such as creating a “humpback whale cautionary area” around Hawaii, but environmentalists don’t believe the proposed precautions will provide enough protection and are taking legal action.

Earthjustice, which is representing a coalition of conservation groups, immediately filed a lawsuit challenging NOAA’s approval of the Navy’s plans, which were also opposed by the California Coastal Commission.

“The science is clear: sonar and live-fire training in the ocean harms marine mammals,” said Marsha Green of Ocean Mammal Institute, which is among the groups being represented. “There are safer ways to conduct Navy exercises that include time and place restrictions to avoid areas known to be vital for marine mammals’ feeding, breeding and resting.”

According to the lawsuit, over the next five years, the authorized training will result in nearly 60,000 hours of the Navy’s most powerful mid-frequency active sonar and more than 450,000 hours of other mid-frequency sonar, low-frequency sonar, high-frequency sonar and the use of more than 260,000 explosives, which will send shock waves and sound energy through the water that can kill or injure marine mammals, in addition to causing physical injuries and behavioral changes to survivors.

In all, it will result in nearly 9.6 million instances of harm by disrupting vital behaviors such as migration, nursing, breeding, feeding and sheltering in waters that are home to a variety of species, including five species of endangered whales and two species of threatened and endangered seals. The groups are arguing that approval of the plan should be invalidated because it was granted without the opportunity for public comment, or the evaluation or consideration of alternatives, which are required under federal law.

“The lawsuit is not asking to stop the Navy from training,” said Susan Millward, executive director of Animal Welfare Institute, in a statement. “Rather, we are asking our government to take the required ‘hard look’ before inflicting this much harm on vulnerable marine mammals populations and to consider alternatives that would allow the Navy to achieve its goals with less damage. For taxpayer-funded activities at this scale, citizen oversight often helps create a better plan.”

The public has previously stood behind marine life on this issue. More than 67,500 people signed the last petition objecting to the Navy’s plans because of the harm it would cause and after about a second of watching the video below and hearing the noise, it’s not hard to understand why.

Read more: , , , , , , ,

Photo credit: Thinkstock

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

249 comments

+ add your own
4:52PM PST on Feb 23, 2014

:/ we are the caretakers of this earth, and we are failing

9:13AM PST on Jan 21, 2014

Petition signed of course!

6:00AM PST on Dec 31, 2013

Firmato.

1:57PM PST on Dec 28, 2013

This is so unfair to these poor beautiful creatures this should be stopped immediately and it is so BARBARIC we will have to fight this for their sake, they cannot speak out so we must do it for them shout as loud as we can. These are intelligent and creatures to hear and look at and we DO NOT WANT OIL RUINING all of that so find some other place to take out. While i am at it can we please put rubbish in the bin and do not throw in the sea otherwise we are no better than these cannibals who are drilling for oil because we could damage or hurt or even kill them. REMEMBER TO KEEP BRITAIN CLEAN AND TIDY

10:42AM PST on Dec 28, 2013

If there is a new petition, please send it my way!

7:14PM PST on Dec 27, 2013

Let us protect them.

11:32AM PST on Dec 27, 2013

John S.: Wasn't closed. I just signed it.

5:55AM PST on Dec 26, 2013

Their job is not to kill

5:49AM PST on Dec 26, 2013

JOHN S: As much as we'd like, there's just now way we can make them all. Take two (2) aspirin or one (1) Xanax with a pint or a wee bit of whisky and Post again tomorrow. Don and WE CAN! :-))

4:24AM PST on Dec 26, 2013

signed

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

I donate clothing that is still wearable and use others for rags. If totally frayed they are tossed…

Happy endings...what a great way to start off the day.

Would this advice be the same if the one left in the car was a child? Hell NO! Carry a brick under…

meet our writers

Julie M. Rodriguez Julie M. Rodriguez is an arts, green living, and political writer based in San Mateo, CA. Her work... more
Story idea? Want to blog? Contact the editors!
ads keep care2 free

more from causes

Animal Welfare

Causes Canada

Causes UK

Children

Civil Rights

Education

Endangered Wildlife

Environment & Wildlife

Global Development

Global Warming

Health Policy

Human Rights

LGBT rights

Politics

Real Food

Trailblazers For Good

Women's Rights




Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.