START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x
2,608,957 people care about Environment & Wildlife

The Next Katrina Could Be a Deadly Solar Storm

The Next Katrina Could Be a Deadly Solar Storm

 

Written by Richard Schiffman

If you live in the lower 48 states, you may never have seen the Northern Lights. This spectacular display is generated when high energy particles from the sun collide with atoms in the high atmosphere creating undulating draperies of multicolored light arrayed along the lines of the earth’s magnetic field.

The phenomenon of the Aurora Borealis is common in polar regions, but rarely seen elsewhere. And that is a good thing, because when the aurora moves south, it is the sign of a solar storm, an event caused by a massive solar flare which can have disastrous consequences for our electric grid. A solar storm in March 1989 caused a blackout in Quebec which left millions of people without electricity for 9 hours, and cost the region an estimated 2 billion dollars, closing hospitals and halting trading on Toronto’s stock market.

This may have been a preview of what lies in store for us in the next couple of years as sun activity is expected to steadily increase, reaching its maximum strength in 2013, according to a prediction issued by NASA together with NOAA, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

Solar activity peaks every 11 years sending waves of charged particles careening toward the earth at speeds over 1000 miles an hour. Much of this energy is absorbed by the upper atmosphere, but some of it gets through and hits the surface of the earth– fortunately at levels too low to cause direct damage to humans. It can, however, interfere with the high power transmission lines which crisscross the US. When these lines get overloaded, they can knock out and sometimes destroy the transformers whose task it is to step down the voltage which passes through them. This is what led to the blackout in Quebec.

But scientists know that vastly larger and more destructive solar storms than this are not just possible, but inevitable. The last recorded Solar Superstorm called the “Carrington Event” occurred over a period of nine days in 1859. It is is believed to have been caused by an explosion on the sun equivalent in force to a billion hydrogen bombs. Auroras were seen as far south as the Caribbean, and telegraph networks failed across the Northern Hemisphere, in some cases even catching fire.

Nobody knows when another storm of this size will envelop our planet, but a recent estimate published in the International Journal of Research and Applications says that there is a one in eight chance of this happening within the next decade. If it does, electrical grids throughout the world will not just fail, but be destroyed. NASA warns that such an event would cause “an avalanche of blackouts carried across continents [that] … could last for weeks to months.”

After Hurricane Andrew in 1992, every spare small transformer in the US was used to restore the damaged electrical grid in South Florida. A Solar Superstorm would multiply this destruction a thousandfold and be utterly impossible to repair in a timely manner.

And if this were not bad enough, the loss of power to nuclear power plants would threaten to create a whole string of Fukushima-type disasters around the globe. The core meltdowns at the Dai-ichi facility last March were not caused directly by the earthquake and tsunami which followed, but by the loss of power to the reactor cooling systems which made the nuclear fuel rods overheat. A potential loss of power for weeks at a time, such as would result from a Solar Superstorm, could overwhelm the capacity of emergency electrical power systems at nuclear generating plants to cope, according to a 2011 report by the Oak Ridge National Laboratory.

That is the bad news. The good news is that the problem can be solved — in the US at least — by a one billion dollar investment in new equipment. That is one twentieth of what the military spends every year for air-conditioning in Iraq and Afghanistan. For that amount we could harden the vulnerable transformers, install ground resistors and create replacement parts for our imperiled electric grid, according to Earth Island Journal.

Nearly two years ago the House passed a bill that would clear the way for these vital safeguards to be put in place. But so far the Senate has failed to ratify the measure. Their continued stonewalling on Solar Shield Bill HR 668 is putting us all at risk.

An earlier version of this piece appeared in the New York Daily News.

 

Read more: , ,

Photo: Joe Plocki/flickr

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

40 comments

+ add your own
5:28PM PDT on Aug 20, 2012

The projected solution cost is $1billion, equivalent to 1/20th of what the US spends a year in Iraq and Afghanistan. What is wrong here? Have we gone completely mad? No finance for the safety of Americans? Is the bottom-line for Haliburton and Blackwater more important than American lives?

9:30AM PDT on Jul 7, 2012

Any storm can be deadly

7:14AM PDT on Jul 6, 2012

Kate K.

I understand your frustration however, I am familiar with the "beastly" behavior of other species and they're mostly worse than us. Baboons are so aggressive it's been said that if THEY had invented the atom bomb, earth wouldn't have lasted a week.

Humans have their faults but, we also have our good points. Note that this "nature" we all love would kill us in a New York second if it had the chance. Our advantage is, we can think about that. Nature has no compassion. We do. We define what we mean by right/wrong, love, compassion, decency. They are our ideals and though we often fail to live up to them, at least we have ideals. I seriously doubt a lion considers the right to life of the water buffalo he just ripped apart.

It has always been my opinion that humans are the technological arm of life and we should use that capability to take life off planet.

...but then, I'm just a progressive/libertarian/socialist...

6:28AM PDT on Jul 6, 2012

The nuclear reactors should be dismantled anyway. I live in an area that has very high cancer rates. Our weather blows in across a lake where there is a reactor. We have heard they routinely dump to let off pressure, and clean things. It is not supposed to be done, but with our high rates of cancer I believe they are indeed dumping.

3:49AM PDT on Jul 6, 2012

thanks for the info

2:51AM PDT on Jul 6, 2012

Please write your congressmen and senators and demand that they vote for Solar Shield Bill HR 668!

2:43AM PDT on Jul 6, 2012

Whenever I her some preaching asshole said the earth will end this hear it doesn't even bother me one bit..but when it comes to our actual solar system and real life events it does scare me! natural desaster is no funny business.

12:51AM PDT on Jul 6, 2012

The sun will do its own thing.....but $20 BILLION on air conditioning is immoral and insane: strange that no-one saw fit to comment on that figure. The melt down threat is very scary....and real. Dismantle the darned reactors! They can never be safe.

8:18PM PDT on Jul 5, 2012

Interresting and scary. Thank you for the information.

7:47PM PDT on Jul 5, 2012

I just wish that the f-cjking idiots that ignore this kind of stuff where the only ones to be affected. But no thousands/hundred thousands/millions will pay the price, so many innocent.

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

meet our writers

Beth Buczynski Beth is a freelance writer and editor living in the Rocky Mountain West. So far, Beth has lived in... more
Story idea? Want to blog? Contact the editors!
ads keep care2 free

more from causes

Animal Welfare

Causes Canada

Causes UK

Children

Civil Rights

Education

Endangered Wildlife

Environment & Wildlife

Global Development

Global Warming

Health Policy

Human Rights

LGBT rights

Politics

Real Food

Trailblazers For Good

Women's Rights




Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.