START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x

The Ozone Layer Needs at Least 50 Years to Recover

The Ozone Layer Needs at Least 50 Years to Recover

How do you solve a problem like the ozone layer? In 1989, we thought we were well on the way with the Montreal Protocol, which directly addressed the growing hole in the ozone layer and took steps to reduce the pollution associated with it. The goal was to help the ozone layer recover, but as it turns out, this has been a slow process, and one marked by ups and downs as well. In other words, the path to recovery is far from over — in fact, scientists estimate that we’re at least 50 years away from having a fully recovered ozone layer, and that’s assuming we do everything right.

But we banned the use of ozone-depleting compounds, right? So how come the ozone layer isn’t perking back up? Well, it’s a complicated story.

For starters, it took years and in some cases decades to fully phase out harmful chemicals — asthmatics like me, for example, may remember that CFC inhalers were in use long after 1989, and in fact many tout the fact that they’re CFC-free because the change is still so new. Furthermore, some chemicals aren’t so easily dispatched (that’s why you have to be responsible when you dispose of old refrigerators and air conditioners). So although the treaty laid the groundwork for getting rid of the chemicals leading to the destruction of the ozone layer, which is a very good thing, it didn’t magically eliminate them.

Even worse, some of them lingered in the atmosphere for years, even after bans started to take effect and nations got into compliance. Pollutants have a funny way of sticking around where they’re not wanted, and the atmosphere hosts a whole slew of bad guys; part of the reason why global climate change is occurring is because of complex chemical interactions in the atmosphere, some of which are caused by pollutants or imbalances in normal chemical levels. Think of it this way: CO2 is holding a party with atmospheric mercury, and they really want to TP your house.

For that reason, NASA estimates that we won’t actually start to see solid signs of recovery in the ozone layer until at least 2025. The ozone hole is leveling out around now, thanks to the Montreal Protocol, and we’re going to start to see a downward trend around 2015, but it will take another ten years, or more, to confirm that trend, and along the way, the ozone layer may waver, because nature doesn’t always do exactly what we want it to do. NASA puts an estimate of the final recovery date between 2058 and 2090, meaning that many of us will never live to see the ozone layer restored to its former glory, and we’re counting on the work of others to follow through when it comes to protecting the environment.

NASA and other agencies keep a very close eye on the ozone hole and what it’s up to, because they want up-to-date information for purposes like issuing sunburn warnings, monitoring overall trends in ozone levels and comparing information day to day to learn more about how the atmosphere behaves. You can follow the ozone hole at a site they maintain for this purpose, where you should be able to see that the size and nature of the ozone hole has shifted over time, rather than trending steadily up or down in an easily-followed trajectory. This explains why researchers are uncertain about when, precisely, we’ll have the ozone layer under control.

Their work also must include the larger issue of global climate change, caused in part by buildups of CO2, a compound that can linger for centuries, in the atmosphere. This and other greenhouse gases are a looming threat for the planet’s long-term health as well as our own.

Read more: , , , ,

Image: 2010 and 2011 ozone surveys over the Arctic illustrate the fluctuation in ozone levels over time. Credit: NASA.

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

77 comments

+ add your own
9:59PM PST on Dec 23, 2013

hopefully future generations will treat it better

9:10PM PST on Dec 21, 2013

Thanks for sharing

4:10PM PST on Dec 21, 2013

Hopefully it will get the chance.

1:38PM PST on Dec 21, 2013

NASA worried about the Ozone layer? Don't make me laugh! Check this out (and also other articles from 'GeoEngineering Watch'): 'Geoengineering is Destroying the Ozone Layer' http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/geoengineering-is-destroying-the-ozone-layer/
And check out 'Angels Still Don't Play This HAARP'.
The armadas of spray planes daily spewing out chemicals (as well as their exhausts) into the stratosphere are decimating the already seriously depleted ozone layer.

1:24PM PST on Dec 21, 2013

All polluting factory farms should be shut down. The horrible cruelty these animals go through before being slaughtered is shameful. It takes many more vegetables, and grains to feed animals to be slaughtered, in our nefarious factory farms, than if we just grow the vegetables on farms, and transport them to us. We can grow vegetables in greenhouses on the roofs of supermarkets, free of pesticides, and not having to transport dirty pesticide laced vegetables 2,000 miles to a supermarket. Also, we can grow fresh vegetables in raised planters in our yards.

11:14AM PST on Dec 21, 2013

Michelle F., the reason we won't do this is because you just said "don't fix meat eating, commit genocide!" You are a horrible human being for believing this.

IF your joking, do note quite a few people have actually had that stance before. Meat uses 10x+ more resources then veganism, and is unhealthy. Stating the proper solution is mass scale murder, is unethical and immoral. I hope your god forgives you, for he doesn't exist.

2:28AM PST on Dec 21, 2013

I remember when The Hole was 1st noted. Some of us worried & wanted to "fix" it...some said "oh, well...and ...some denied it made any difference...some just denied it !!! So, now we know all about it and still are contaminating the air..My question...Why?

2:22AM PST on Dec 21, 2013

Bloody shocking

11:56PM PST on Dec 20, 2013

David L. I'm not going vegan because of a cow overpopulation problem. Why don't we try reducing the humans that require so many to be bred then maybe the numbers will go down with the demand.

9:56PM PST on Dec 20, 2013

our problems do not have magical, immediate solutions

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

What do we expect? Russia is turning on it's own sons and daughters because they are gay. You expect…

Freddy, does that also include the Anti-Abortionist who employ civil disobedience to prevent women from…

Story idea? Want to blog? Contact the editors!
ads keep care2 free



Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.