START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
2,508,899 people care about Environment & Wildlife

The U.S. is Spending Your Money Killing Innocent Wildlife

The U.S. is Spending Your Money Killing Innocent Wildlife

Wildlife Services (WS). It sounds like a group that provides services to wildlife, doesn’t it? Like disposing of leg-hold traps or curtailing hunting? Does your opinion change if I tell you it is part of the federal government — specifically the USDA?

How about if I add that the first part of WS’s mission, according to its own website, is to help “protect a healthy environment for people”?

Even more illuminating: its name used to be “Animal Damage Control.” That is a much more accurate description of what WS does.

The coup de grace: Fox News ran an expose of WS’s activities. Even the Evil Empire thinks WS is too evil.

So here’s the real deal: Wildlife Services runs like a business, with human property owners and ranchers as its clients. It turns a profit on its work by charging clients for its services and adding that income to its coffers on top of steep public subsidies. Its job is to keep wildlife out of people’s way and to protect their property (usually livestock). WS generally displays no interest in the rest of its mission: protecting a healthy environment for fish and wildlife. To the contrary, it tortures wildlife.

Whistle-blower Gary Strader told Fox News how WS “protects a healthy environment” for coyotes. Employees set out leg-hold snares to catch coyotes — even those with no interest in or history of attacking sheep or other livestock. When they catch one, they set dogs on it to rip the trapped animal apart. “You let your dogs fight with them,” Strader said. “That was part of the job.” His supervisor would watch a coyote’s violent demise and laugh.

As Congressman John Campbell, R-Calif., said, “This agency has become an outlet for people to abuse animals for no particular reason.”

Indulge me as I emphasize one more time: Fox News relied on two federal Congress members (one of whom is a Democrat!) for its conclusion that the “brutal approach by Wildlife Services is part of a culture of animal cruelty that has long persisted within an agency that uses taxpayer money to wage an unnecessary war on wildlife.”

Ah, now I see Fox’s angle: it’s not necessarily concern for wildlife that is winding it up, but the use of taxpayer dollars, to the tune of $57.9 million in fiscal year 2008. For 2010, according to USDA documents obtained by the Kansas City Star, that amount was $126.5 million (and that is just the taxpayers’ portion — it doesn’t include what WS’s clients paid for services rendered). In 2010 the agency killed over four million wild animals.

The Democrat that Fox News relied on in its story, Peter DeFazio, D-Ore., has been fighting to defund Wildlife Services for over 25 years. He said he doesn’t “understand why it should be the responsibility of the federal government to attempt to — very ineffectively and, in fact, probably detrimentally — remove wildlife that has not been implicated in attacks on people and cattle.”

Ineffectively and detrimentally indeed. WS is responsible for knocking ecosystems out of whack by decimating  predator populations.

“Wildlife Services’ predator control work kills tens of thousands of animals each year. Removing large numbers of predators from the landscape can have very real, very damaging effects on the land, increasing erosion, sending prey populations out of control, and removing important ecosystem services that healthy predator populations provide,” writes Fox’s Melissa Waage.

Leg-hold traps are not the only trick up WS’s sleeve. Its methods “include shooting from helicopters and airplanes [known as aerial gunning], trapping, poisoning, and denning (poisoning pups in their dens). Trapping and poisoning injure or kill ‘non-target’ animals such as deer, birds, and pets — even endangered species.”

The kicker: the Humane Society of the United States reports that there are effective “non-lethal methods to protect livestock and crops, and evidence that killing predators doesn’t even solve the problem,” because in response to losing members of their packs, many species have more babies.

People and the press outted WS long ago, and negative coverage of the organization persists. A 2010 article in New York Magazine focused on WS’s war on geese — apparently the agency isn’t content exterminating only predators. A year later The Kansas City Star also described WS’s brutal round-ups of peaceful geese who couldn’t fly because they were molting and without their flight feathers. WS packed them tightly into crates and gassed them to death. In 2012 The Sacramento Bee exposed the agency’s killing of members of endangered species like golden eagles and its subsequent cover-up.

In the same article the paper found that since 2000, the agency had killed 50,000 non-target animals, including not only federally protected and endangered animals but also more than 1,100 dogs, including pets. WS has exposed the public to cyanide. Its crusade to shoot animals from helicopters, known as “aerial gunning,” has killed ten people and injured many others. The executions are indiscriminate.

Wildlife Services upsets quite a few people, so it tries to keep its activities out of public view. The acting California State Director said, “we pride ourselves on our ability to go in and get the job done quietly without many people knowing about it.” Reporter Tom Knudson of The Sacramento Bee observed that WS does not allow journalists to view its activities — something even the military permits.

A former WS district manager knows why the agency hides from the public, calling its public profile “smoke and mirrors.” The reality: “It’s a killing business. And it ain’t pretty.”

When a WS employee mistakenly kills a non-target animal like a family pet, the agency directs him not to report the incident (though the organization is required to report such killings), to bury the pet, and to throw away the collar. “That’s how we were taught to do it,” said former employee Rex Shaddox.

Wildlife Services is bad news for all creatures great and small. Let’s defund it and use the money to protect wildlife instead of exterminating it.


Related Stories:

‘Wildlife Specialist’ Posts Pics of His Dogs Torturing Coyote Caught in Trap

New Bill Would Stop Accidental Poisoning of Wildlife, Pets and People

Fish & Wildlife Plan Threatens Cats’ Lives


Read more: , , , , ,

Photo credit:

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it


+ add your own
6:17PM PST on Dec 11, 2013

Write your representative in Washington. Defunding this division is a GOOD cutback!

6:01AM PDT on May 11, 2013

Thank you for sharing.

4:09AM PDT on May 3, 2013

thanks for sharing :)

12:16AM PDT on Apr 18, 2013

sarah h, you are Off topic, this has nothing to do with babies! And who cares what you think about it, you're clearly another mouthpiece for the crazy righties.

3:50AM PDT on Apr 17, 2013

no comment(this should not be happening)thank you

6:26PM PDT on Apr 11, 2013


4:09AM PDT on Apr 7, 2013

America, land of greed where no animal or human is safe if you don't have money. Your pets are even killed for no reason (breed specific laws etc) I am so ashamed of our country :(

4:00AM PDT on Apr 7, 2013

Where is the outrage over spending our tax dollars to kill innocent unborn babies?

5:39PM PDT on Apr 2, 2013

Thank you for sharing.

5:38PM PDT on Apr 2, 2013

Thank you for sharing.

add your comment

Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

Care2 - Be Extraordinary - Start a Care2 Petition
ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

Are we suprised!! Hope the B.B.C. continues with it's campaign.

Good article. I've been in the position of trying to regain physical strength after surgery and boy it…

ads keep care2 free

more from causes

Animal Welfare

Causes Canada

Causes UK


Civil Rights


Endangered Wildlife

Environment & Wildlife

Global Development

Global Warming

Health Policy

Human Rights

LGBT rights


Real Food

Trailblazers For Good

Women's Rights

Select names from your address book   |   Help

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.