Care2 will go offline for site maintenance July 31 at 9pm PST.
START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x
896,465 people care about Women's Rights

The Women on Page 198: Glamour Continues Dialogue on Body Image

The Women on Page 198: Glamour Continues Dialogue on Body Image

Do you remember the woman on page 194?

Her bare-it-all image in Glamour magazine’s September issue stirred quite the buzz early this fall when it hit newstands. With thousands of comments and over a million page views on glamour.com the picture of “plus-size” model Lizzie Miller struck a cord with women across America. 

Glamour editor-in-chief Cindi Leive was inundated with positive feedback on the picture and promised readers that Glamour was listening and “committed to celebrating all kinds of beauty.” I was skeptical that Leive would hold true to her promise, but I was pleasantly surprised when I turned to page 198 of this month’s issue and found not one but seven beautiful “plus-size” models starring back at me in a two-page spread – all au naturale.

The models – including now infamous Miller – have been assembled by Glamour to “continue the extraordinary dialogue on body image” that began with Miller’s picture just a few months ago. In the article Glamour reaffirms its commitment to showcasing a wide range of body types – even despite the challenges presented by the fashion industry.

Did you know that samples of designer clothing are almost always cut to a size zero to four? Without sample size clothing in larger sizes, finding current fashionable clothing for “plus-size” models to wear is a difficult challenge. Fashion editors can’t just buy “plus-size” models clothes from stores because those designs would be off the racks and impossible to purchase by the time magazines hit newsstands.

Fed up with the limiting sizes of sample clothes, British Vogue editor, Alexandra Shulman wrote an angry letter to scores of top designers in England and America. In the letter she accuses designers of supplying magazine’s with “minuscule” garments for photo shoots thus making them hire models with “jutting bones and no breasts or hips.” Shulman continued, “We have now reached the point where many of the sample sizes don’t comfortably fit even the established star models.” Having such a powerhouse of the fashion world pen such a letter is an important (and hopeful) step, but only time will tell the impact.

What I found refreshing in Glamour’s article was the recognition that “plus-size models aren’t all that ‘plus.’” According to Glamour senior bookings editor, Jennifer Koehler, the sample-size problem means that any model larger than a size four will have trouble getting work because she won’t fit in the clothes and a woman over a size 6 could be moved to the plus-size division. Jennie Runk, one of the “plus-size” models pictured in the article’s two-page spread, even admits to wearing padding to fit the “plus-size” clothing she is given to model because she is too small.

The absence of sample clothing in larger sizes is prohibitive to magazines who want to book “plus-size” models and creates a high demand for thin models who fit the designs. In their continued support of portraying a wider range of body types, Glamour promises to support any designer who manufactures clothing that can be used on full-bodied models. The magazine also promises to not only give “plus-size” models work but the “same great work straight-size models get, partnering with top photographers, stylists, and makeup artists.”

I was also pleased to see that this month Glamour pictured Scarlett Johansson – a celebrity who has advocated for a healthy body image frequently in the past – on the cover. Most recent she authored a blog on the Huffington Post in response to rumors that she crash dieted to lose 14lbs while training for an upcoming film. “I’m frustrated with the irresponsibility of tabloid media who sell the public ideas about what we should look like and how we should get there,” Johansson said. “The press should be held accountable for the false ideals they sell to their readers regarding body image — that’s the real weight of the issue.”

So, what do you think? Is Glamour living up to its promises of celebrating “all kinds of beauty?” Are you encouraged by this month’s issue? If so, what will it take to get other magazine’s to follow suit?  If not, what can Glamour and other women’s magazine’s do to portray a wider range of beauty? 

It’s important that we continue this discussion – loudly and passionately – so that real changes are made to escape the thin-beauty ideal we have all become so accustomed to.

What I’d like to see is the picture on page 198 on the cover and the women sporting today’s latest fashion trends in clothes that fit and celebrate their bodies.

More from Glamour:

On the C.L.: Are you Ready to Start a Body Image Revolution? Oh, Wait – You Already Did!

Supermodels Who Aren’t Superthin: Meet the Women Who Proudly Bared it All

Body-Confidence Secrets From Plus-Size Model Crystal Renn

More from Care2:

End The Fat Talk: Friends Don’t Let Friends Talk Fat

Stylist Quits After Designer Decides to Showcase “Plus-Size” Models

Life Doesn’t Have to Wait Until You Are Skinny: Plus-Size Model Crystal Renn Reveals All in New Book

The Woman on Page 194: Plus-Size Model Bares All For Glamour

Read more: , , , , , ,

Photo courtesy of glamour.com - http://www.glamour.com/health-fitness/2009/10/these-bodies-are-beautiful-at-every-size

quick poll

vote now!

Loading poll...

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

560 comments

+ add your own
5:47PM PDT on Jul 27, 2014

thanks

4:05AM PDT on Jul 17, 2014

thank you

5:19PM PDT on Jul 15, 2014

Thanks

1:50AM PDT on Jul 14, 2014

Thank you for sharing!

5:07AM PDT on Jul 9, 2014

What does a size mean?

1:25AM PDT on Jul 8, 2014

All sizes should be ok.

But please, let's have pics with clothes on.

3:00AM PDT on Jul 7, 2014

ty

1:06PM PDT on Jun 30, 2014

@Ernest R.

Beauty is irrelevant.
It's what's inside that matters.

That people make it relevant,
doesn't mean it is.

12:54PM PDT on Jun 30, 2014

(To begin with this, I'm absolutely not homophobic.) But do wonder about this...
For gay men, these often too skinny women may look glamorously but do they see real women for what they are? Many of the artists are gay men designing for women or photographing women. RIP Versace.

Maybe we need more female or non-gay designers?
Come to think, not so fond of Marlies Dekkers either, never my size or good support.
Maybe someone feels they can design for women better because walking around nude in my home already makes my neighbors cringe, let alone outside.

Respect the effort of Glamour.

8:24PM PDT on Jun 24, 2014

To Great White E...I wasn't finished. And your comment absolutely reinforces my comment. Calling yourself a "man" is a gross misstatement.
;
"Again, while they look sexy, unless their fat bellies are seen; PIC of this article hides. I hate these sort of waste of time Mags and Media, so I never "read" or seen the real thing. As a man, if their bellies are not too much, then I would have sex with them."





add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

ads keep care2 free

meet our writers

Beth Buczynski Beth is a freelance writer and editor living in the Rocky Mountain West. So far, Beth has lived in... more
Story idea? Want to blog? Contact the editors!
ads keep care2 free



Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.