START A PETITION 27,000,000 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x
2,168,366 people care about Human Rights

This Plan Would Turn Brazil’s Empty World Cup Stadiums Into Housing For The Poor

This Plan Would Turn Brazil’s Empty World Cup Stadiums Into Housing For The Poor

This post was written by Alexandra Govere and originally appeared on RYOT.

The World Cup was a joyous occasion for Team Brazil soccer fans… until they got royally owned by Germany and the Netherlands.

Now everyone’s talking about who won when they should be talking about those who lost everything.

Long before the tournament ended in heartbreak for Brazil, many poor locals were already suffering for soccer. The nation forcefully demolished more than 100,000 homes to make way for the World Cup and Olympics, forcing families that were already struggling to uproot and restart elsewhere.

“It’s a nightmare,” Dalvaneide Pequeno told the Associated Press. “There’s nothing here. No work, no hospitals, no public transport, nothing. They forced us out of our houses and dropped us here in the middle of nowhere.”

Families like hers were relocated as part of an “urban renewal” project to bring more athletes, fans and businesses into cleaned up slums. For example, Team Ghana’s World Cup home base was in Maceió, Brazil — the nation’s deadliest city with the fifth-highest murder rate in the world.

When developing or newly industrialized nations get the “honor” of hosting international events, it’s common for them to sweep their poor under the rug… and leave them there once the festivities are over.

Brazil spent millions of dollars on 12 stadiums for the World Cup. Although a couple will be reused in the 2016 Summer Olympics, there’s no long-term plan for the others.

But two French architects think they know what to do with the empty, expensive complexes: Turn them into affordable housing for those on the far left of Brazil’s economic equator.

The Casa Futebol project would install modular housing units between the stadiums’ concrete pylons.

At 1,100 square feet, each unit would be large enough for a family of four. They’d be built into preexisting spaces on the outside of each structure.

The central fields and inner seating would remain in occasional use, and a portion of ticket sales from soccer matches would finance the construction and maintenance of the colorful modules.

Sounds awesome, and a lot of people are calling it that, but I’ve got a few questions about the feasibility of this project.

First, can the stadiums withstand so much added weight?

Second, would the well-to-do Brazilians who’d be funding Casa Futebol pay to watch games where the poorest citizens live?

Lastly, since low-income housing sadly often comes with high crime rates, isn’t there a chance that these developments could become something like “the projects” in NYC?

While any idea to help people in need should be applauded for its intentions, tucking the poor away and stacking them like blocks may only widen economic divides.

Before any plan to alleviate poverty can fully work in Brazil (or anywhere), the nation’s upper and lower classes will have to change the way they view and treat each other — a task that’ll prove much harder than scoring against Germany and the Netherlands.

 

Read more: , , , ,

Photo Credit: Thinkstock

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

61 comments

+ add your own
10:59AM PDT on Oct 1, 2014

After forcing these people out of their homes and demolishing them, YES, they owe these people!!

11:25AM PDT on Jul 25, 2014

They should! It is the least they can do.....

8:27AM PDT on Jul 23, 2014

Thanks.

5:58AM PDT on Jul 22, 2014

Sounds like it could be a good plan, but even better than housing for poor people only is to have housing for mixed incomes. It's a harder sell, and it truly has to be mixed, not 90% low income and 10% middle income or no middle income people will want to live there.

Maybe making the area more mixed use in other ways too could help - offering great deals to businesses who want to move in. But again, if it's not a mixed income area, no businesses will want to move in because if it's only very poor people they will have no paying customers.

Yankee Stadium is in a poor section of the Bronx, and tens of thousands of people have gone there for games for decades. If there's a reasonably secure path to get to the stadium from public transit or a parking lot, people will go to games there.

2:22AM PDT on Jul 22, 2014

thanks

3:29PM PDT on Jul 21, 2014

"Before any plan to alleviate poverty can fully work in Brazil (or anywhere), the nation’s upper and lower classes will have to change the way they view and treat each other — a task that’ll prove much harder than scoring against Germany and the Netherlands." How very true, and how very sad.

10:25AM PDT on Jul 21, 2014

So, get on with it! Any home must be better than to have none...

5:21PM PDT on Jul 20, 2014

Sad situation, to have kicked thousands of people out of their homes in the first place.

2:02PM PDT on Jul 20, 2014

"The nation forcefully demolished more than 100,000 homes to make way for the World Cup and Olympics, forcing families that were already struggling to uproot and restart elsewhere."

Brazil SHOULD do something for these poor people they uprooted. I'm so sick of events like this (ie: Olympics etc) and the damage they do to poor people and homeless animals!

4:02AM PDT on Jul 20, 2014

Interesting.

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

Care2 - Be Extraordinary - Start a Care2 Petition
ads keep care2 free
CONTACT THE EDITORS

Recent Comments from Causes

Hmmmm, interesting how the title of this article is soooo true! Again, the title is: "Eat Meat? You’re…

1. Fat 2. Salt 3. HFCS 4. Preservatives 5. Too expensive for what it is

ads keep care2 free



Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.