START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good

Toothless Rio Summit Draft Decried by NGOs

Toothless Rio Summit Draft Decried by NGOs


As world leaders fly into Rio de Janeiro, Brazil for the start of the Rio+20 United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development, NGOs and environmentalists are decrying the weak draft language that the leaders are expected to approve at the end of the meeting. As every business student learns, you can’t improve what you don’t measure, and the draft released today is sorely lacking in metrics, benchmarks and quantified goals. The draft document contains 283 paragraphs that outline most decisively the problems that face humans on earth. It’s the actions to be taken to mitigate issues of poverty, inequity and environmental degradation that are unclear.

All Embracing Vagueness

All segments and interest groups, including indigenous people, workers and trade unions, corporations, farmers, NGOs, the science and tech community and young people are acknowledged in the draft…it is inclusive in its vagueness, while calling for attention and compliance with the myriad global agreements that have already been negotiated. Likewise, the litany of issues is comprehensive, from water use  to toxic chemicals, from gender equity to access to healthcare.  This systemic approach is desirable, but lack of mechanisms and benchmarks make the catalog of miseries seem insurmountable.

Response to the draft, which was posted by the Guardian, has been highly critical: Kumi Naidoo, International Executive Director of Greenpeace, was firm: “The future we want has gotten a little further away today. Rio+20 has turned into an epic failure. It has failed on equity, failed on ecology and failed on economy. … From the G20 to Rio+20 this is not a good week for people and the planet. While billions are being spent bailing out banks and billions more on subsidising the fossil fuel industry, its clear whose agenda our leaders are following, that of business as usual of polluting corporations.”

Weak Wording
WWF Director General Jim Leape noted the weakened language and dim prospects: “Now it’s up to world leaders to get serious about sustainable development and save this process. If they approve what’s on the table now without significant changes, they’ve doomed Rio+20 to ridicule.” Leape continued: “While some weak words have been removed, diplomats have swapped them with toothless language. This includes tongue twisters like ‘commit to the progressive realization’ and several promises to ‘recognize’ problems and solutions. They’ve added some positive actions around oceans protection. But, the text has lots of words that ‘commit’ parties to nothing – such as ‘commit to promote’ and ‘commit to systematically consider.’”

A Conference on Sustainable Conferencing….
One frustrated commenter even created a fake press release, purportedly from the “United Nations Conference on Sustainable Discussions,” with tongue in cheek references to a spurious quote from a misnamed president of Brazil:“While some proposals discussed until now threatened to constitute a breakthrough and offer concrete solutions, our government has been decisive in ensuring that those are replaced with a language respecting the sustainability of our  discussions.”

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton will lead the US delegation to the Rio conference; like the heads of state of the UK and Germany, President Obama has no plans to attend.

Multiple, Interconnected Problems
The draft does clarify, over and over, the absolute and necessary connections among poverty, justice and environmental stewardship, saying: “We recognize that poverty eradication, changing unsustainable and promoting sustainable patterns of consumption and production, and protecting and managing the natural resource base of economic and social development are the overarching objectives of and essential requirements for sustainable development.” Just as we cannot address poverty by helping everyone in the world to consume resources like an average American, we cannot save the plants and animals without consideration for the human species’ needs and place in the ecosystem.
Some points are sure to draw conservative criticism, such as the confirmation of the issue of climate change, “We acknowledge that climate change is a cross-cutting and persistent crisis and express our concern that the scale and gravity of the negative impacts of climate change affect all countries and undermine the ability of all countries, in particular, developing countries, to achieve sustainable development…”

Role of Business Called Out
The role of business in attaining — or impeding —  sustainable development is recognized in several places in the draft, including a call for a different way to measure progress, beyond the simple counting of economic activity without regard for social or environmental consequence: “We recognize the need for broader measures of progress to complement GDP in order to better inform policy decisions” and how corporations report their progress: “We acknowledge the importance of corporate sustainability reporting and encourage companies, where appropriate, especially publicly listed and large companies, to consider integrating sustainability information into their reporting cycle.”

While There’s Talk, There’s Hope?
Environmental journalist George Monbiot suggests the main reason that hopes are so low for this Rio Summit lies in the social power grab of the last two decades: “The past 20 years have been a billionaires’ banquet. At the behest of corporations and the ultra-rich, governments have removed the constraining decencies – the laws and regulations – which prevent one person from destroying another. To expect governments funded and appointed by this class to protect the biosphere and defend the poor is like expecting a lion to live on gazpacho.” And yet, yes, one cannot help hoping. As the Brazilian novelist Paolo Coelho has said, “The secret of life, though, is to fall seven times and to get up eight times.” Let’s hope the negotiators in Rio can stay on their feet this week.


Related Stories:

Rio+20 Or Bust: Activists Doubt Summit’s Impact

Will Putting a Price Tag on Natural Resources Make Business Care About the Environment?

6 Things to Expect from Rio+20


Read more: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

image via iStockphoto

quick poll

vote now!

Loading poll...

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it


+ add your own
10:00AM PDT on Jun 24, 2012


12:02AM PDT on Jun 22, 2012

Look anything can happen. Although I don't agree with all of this report.

6:31PM PDT on Jun 21, 2012


4:11PM PDT on Jun 21, 2012

these types of conferences don't do much, countries aren't really going to do anything that's told to them unfortunately :/ like Kyoto, people don't listen.

8:30AM PDT on Jun 21, 2012

controversial as always

3:00AM PDT on Jun 21, 2012

Diana S. - I send you a green star.

The only problem we have is convincing the politicians to have the guts to enable this AND to retrain the NGOs because there would be unemployment ! It is in their employment security for there to always be unrest, disasters and wars caused by man's inabilities to do right, corporations or misguided governments enticed to poor decisions by Western corporations and overpopulation.

2:34AM PDT on Jun 21, 2012

It's so sad that a summit like this is commited to achieving nothing :-(

10:37PM PDT on Jun 20, 2012

Diana, you are so right! What words of wisdom, like music to my ears. If only the politicians and the rest of society could think like you the world would be well on it's way to recovery.

4:53PM PDT on Jun 20, 2012

Want to save the planet? Want to save the ecosystem? Then make abortion and sterilization for HUMANS available to anyone, at any age, for any reason. When the question is "endangered species survival versus human populations," MOVE the humans out of the critters' habitats. STOP sending so-called "humanitarian aid" to countries that have no chance in HELL of EVER sustaining their own populations, and instead send them birth control (with nurses to instruct the people in its use) and doctors to perform sterilizations. When a country loses a substantial amount of its population due to natural disasters, wars, insufficient resources, or whatever, move the remaining population to one area of the country and dedicate the rest of the land to animal habitats and wild environment forever.

That should keep us busy for the first WEEK or so; after that, let's get REALLY tough on the problem humans have created on earth!

4:36PM PDT on Jun 20, 2012

While I don't agree with the use of nuclear power for energy, mainly because I don't believe the methods of waste disposal for it are sound, or proven to be safe, I wholeheartedly agree with some of the sentiment and views on over-population. This, by far, is one of the most important issues for the world to come to terms with because its effects are widespread. It needs urgent attention by governments, not just lip service. People can't keep having 10, 11 or more children in underdeveloped countries and expect the rest of the world to pick up the tab. Rio + 20 should have definitely had this at the top of the agenda. Talk about missed opportunity.

add your comment

Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

Care2 - Be Extraordinary - Start a Care2 Petition
ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

PS> It is very rare to find a GOOD COP THESE DAYS----some are out there but far and few!

ads keep care2 free

more from causes

Select names from your address book   |   Help

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.