START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x
1,392,791 people care about Politics

Towns Can Ban Fracking, Says NY Supreme Court

Towns Can Ban Fracking, Says NY Supreme Court

After ongoing battles between communities and natural gas companies, individual towns now have secured the right to ban fracking within their own limits. It’s a moderate eco victory that essentially dictates: you don’t have to stop drilling, but you can’t drill here.

On a day marked by discouraging decisions by the United States Supreme Court, New York’s Supreme Court provided something for New York state environmentalists to get excited about: a 5-2 decision allowing towns to establish zoning laws that keep out fracking companies.

Private companies had filed a lawsuit against a pair of rural towns, Otsego County’s Middlefield and Tompkins County’s Dryden, claiming that their bans contradicted New York state’s existing oil and gas laws. Although the appeal was directed at these two towns in particular, there are many throughout New York that have passed similar resolutions against fracking, so the ruling has much wider implications.

Those hoping the ruling would in some way include a condemnation of fracking itself will be somewhat disappointed. The judges say they based their decision solely on reaffirming towns’ rights to make their own zoning choices. In the ruling, judges explicitly stated, “These appeals are not about whether hydrofracking is beneficial or detrimental to the economy, environment, or energy needs of New York, and we pass no judgment on its merits. These are major policy questions for the coordinate branches of government to resolve.”

Still, it’s a net gain for the environmental community. Thus far, grassroots efforts have been most successful at countering fracking, so empowering small towns to tell natural gas companies to take a hike will hopefully make logistics even more difficult for the industry.

“It’s really, really great for the local municipalities who need to defend themselves against these big national and international corporate interests,” said Susan Zimet, supervisor for New Paltz, another town that opted to ban fracking a couple of years ago.

On the flip side, Karen Moreau, representing the Petroleum Council, called the ruling “a real tragedy for thousands of impoverished farmers and rural people.” Despite her clear affiliation with the natural gas industry, she insisted that the real losers were private citizens and landowners who wouldn’t be allowed to receive payoffs from the gas companies to drill on their land.

A couple of New York’s judges did agree with Moreau, however. The two dissenting justices argued that the towns’ bans were too broad and would have far-reaching repercussions on other industries, as well.

As it stands, no fracking is currently occurring in the state of New York; six years ago, the governor suspended the activity altogether until research could address potential safety issues. Though officials haven’t set a deadline for a final decision on the matter to be made, individual towns have resolved to preemptively ban it in their own backyards anyway. With this latest ruling, these towns can ensure their no fracking zoning rules can stay on the books regardless of what the state government ultimately decides.

Of course, individual fracking bans alone are not enough to protect communities. Arbitrary town borders do not limit the repercussions of fracking, particularly water contamination. If a neighboring town okays fracking next to a town that has banned it, both will likely face the consequences.

That’s why eco-activists will continue to call on New York’s government to permanently stop fracking altogether. Join more than 15,000 other Care2 members in signing this petition to demand a statewide ban.

Read more: , , , , , ,

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

77 comments

+ add your own
3:33PM PDT on Jul 7, 2014

Unfortunately, banning a practice inside a small boundary may not be enough to protect its citizens from the toxic chemicals that will end up in their water or air.

3:30AM PDT on Jul 7, 2014

A good step forward.

3:18AM PDT on Jul 7, 2014

Thanks

8:19PM PDT on Jul 6, 2014

Thanks for sharing.

6:46PM PDT on Jul 6, 2014

Thanks

6:27PM PDT on Jul 6, 2014

Go NYS Court of Appeals.

2:34PM PDT on Jul 6, 2014

Everyone: Ban fracking!

1:28PM PDT on Jul 6, 2014

Thank you for the post.

9:56AM PDT on Jul 6, 2014

The private and federal well integrity standards are very high, the long term benefits far outweigh the nearly non-existence risk.

Without fracking, the economy, healthcare, security, education, living standards, poverty all would be a negative. When a country cannot afford a high standard of living, the environment will suffer as it has in other socialist controlled countries ( Russia, China, etc).

1:52AM PDT on Jul 6, 2014

Thanks for sharing

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

Blasphemy is in the eye of the beholder. One person's blasphemy may be very different from another person's…

My heart is broken. RIP beautiful Satao. I can't understand why they didn't try to protect him knowing…

Humanity is certainly showing why it does not merit being the superior species. We wait until the last…

Story idea? Want to blog? Contact the editors!
ads keep care2 free

more from causes




Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.