I’m a girl and I like pink. I also like purple, green and orange, but really I’m supposed to like pink. Or so says our culture from the day we are born – pink for girls and blue for boys.
The distinction is especially clear when it comes to toys. Aisles of pink Barbies, doll houses and princess costumes are meant to lure girls, or rather their parents, to the checkout line. Walk down a toy aisle today and you’ll find some new additions for girls, like bows and arrows and Nerf guns, but you’ll know they are for girls because, well, they’re pink.
The emergence of female heroines like Katniss Everdeen from The Hunger Games, Merida from Brave or Tris from the new movie Divergent has given girls a whole new set of strong female role models that have inspired lots of new toys. Great news, right? Well, not too fast. While yes it’s great that girls have options for more active toys, it’s also frustrating that said toys fall prey to the tired gender stereotypes of girls loving pink.
“The result is a selection of toys that, oddly, both challenges antiquated notions and plays to them deeply,” says a New York Times article about the pinkification of toys for girls.
Sharon Lamb, a child psychologist and play therapist, featured in the Times article adds, “What I don’t like is the stereotyped girlifying of this. Do they have to be in pink? Why can’t they be rebels and have to be re-BELLES? Why do they need to look sexy when aggressing, defending the weak or fighting off bad guys?”
I have to agree with Lamb. In trying to shatter gender stereotypes on one hand, these new toys are reinforcing them with another. Funny thing is that Katniss doesn’t have a pink bow and arrow in the movie (and probably wouldn’t be caught dead with one). Actually, none of the characters who inspired these types of toys are “girly,” so why are they being branded this way?
The Nerf Rebelle Heartbreaker isn’t the only culprit. Even toys like GoldieBlox and Roominate – which were designed specifically to get girls interested in science, technology, engineering and math (STEM) fields that are predominately dominated by men — use pastels and shades of pink in their design. Don’t get me wrong. The products are great and help break stereotypes that girls aren’t good at or interested in STEM, but they reinforce the concept that girls should love pink. Why not use bold primary colors instead?
Luckily, there are some great new products that are expanding their color palettes for girls. The new average-sized Barbie, Lammily, isn’t decked out in pink like her counterpart Barbie, but rather has outfits in blue, orange and yellow, not to mention the fact that she was designed using the measurements of an average 19-year-old girl.
Another successful crowd funding campaign, Girls Will Be, is creating shorts for girls that aren’t “shorty shorts or skinny fits” and that stray away from “pink, ruffles, or bows.” The casual cargo shorts or perfect play shorts will be perfect for girls who like to run around with their bows and arrows or Nerf guns.
Gender stereotyping stretches beyond toys and clothes to books. The Let Books Be Books campaign in the UK is hoping to stop children’s books from being labelled as “for boys” or “for girls” because “telling children which stories and activities are ‘for them’ based on their gender closes down whole worlds of interest.” The campaign has gotten support from several publishers and authors, as well as the general public.
Lammily, Girls Will Be and Let Books be Books are shining examples of breaking down stereotypes through and through. We need these examples to become the norm so that girls and boys aren’t locked into separate pink and blue worlds, and the time is now. We have seen that girls’ interests are changing, but by pinkifying these new toys we are still telling girls not to abandon their femininity or girly side. While there is nothing wrong with being a pink-loving-girly-girl, it is wrong for girls to feel that they must be girly to be a real girl.
Presenting girls (and boys for that matter) with toys in a variety of colors will show them that they can just be a kid.
What do you think?
Related from Care2:
Photo Credit: JanetMcKnight via Flickr